Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vijay Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar

Vijay Kumar vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 13, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974794

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vijay Kumar

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.33939 of 2011 ====================================================== vijay kumar .... .... petitioner/s versus the state of bihar .... .... opposite party/s =====================================================”13. 01-2012 heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the state. the petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under section 498a of the indian penal code and section 3/4 dowry prohibition act. the marriage was performed in the year 2008 but it appears that the divorce case was filed on 14.06.2011 thereafter the present case has been lodged. from the order dated 12.10.2011 it further appears that reconciliation was going and it is submitted today that the ex-party divorce suit was decreed. it is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that the informant has challenged the ex-parte decree of divorce. considering the fact that the ex-parte divorce decree has been passed, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, patna in connection with kadam kuan p.s. case no. 195/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr.p.c. it is made clear that the bail is being granted to the petitioner only on the basis of the ex-parte decree of divorce. if the ex-parte decree of divorce is unsettled then the informant will be at liberty to file an appropriate application in the present proceeding. (dinesh kumar singh, j) amrendra kumar/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33939 of 2011 ====================================================== Vijay Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s =====================================================”

13. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner being the husband is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act. The marriage was performed in the year 2008 but it appears that the divorce case was filed on 14.06.2011 thereafter the present case has been lodged. From the order dated 12.10.2011 it further appears that reconciliation was going and it is submitted today that the ex-party divorce suit was decreed. It is submitted by learned counsel for the informant that the informant has challenged the ex-parte decree of divorce. Considering the fact that the ex-parte divorce decree has been passed, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing the bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Kadam Kuan P.S. Case No. 195/2011 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. It is made clear that the bail is being granted to the petitioner only on the basis of the ex-parte decree of divorce. If the ex-parte decree of divorce is unsettled then the informant will be at liberty to file an appropriate application in the present proceeding. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Amrendra Kumar/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial