Patna Court May 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Fatte Kamkar and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2231 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Fatte Kamkar 2. Surendra Kamkar 3. Birendra Kamkar. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH25. 01-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 447, 341 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The specific accusation of causing firearm injury is against Harendra Paswan and Jungbahadur Paswan who are not petitioners before this Court. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve wee...
Qudus Ansari@raju Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2944 of 2012 Quddus Ansari @ Raju @ Raju Khan, Son of Late Karamat Ansari, Resident of village Kajrat Nawadih, Police Station Hussainabad, District Palamu. ............ Petitioner. Versus The State of Bihar ............ Opp. Party. ---------------------------------- 02/ 25.01.2012 Heard. This is a petition for regular bail for the offence under Sections 395 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier the bail petition of the petitioner has been rejected twice by this Court vide order dated 06.02.2009 and 21.04.2010. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 02.06.2004. However, the trial has not been concluded as yet. The Sessions Judge in his order dated 29.11.2011, however, has observed that the case may be concluded within three months if the witnesses will be produced by the prosecution. Hence, taking into consideration the custody of the petitioner, if the case is not conclude...
Raja Ram Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3067 of 2012 (2) dt.25-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3067 of 2012 ====================================================== 1. Raja Ram S/O Late Amichand Ram R/O Vill Banwari Basant , P.S. Garakha, Distt-Saran At Chapra .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH) 02. 25.01.2012 The petitioner was granted bail by this Court by order dated 23.12.2011 but due to inadvertence instead of Garakha P.S. Case No. 57 of 1991 it was mentioned as Garakha P.S. Case No. 51 of 1991 and the number of the Presiding Officer was mentioned as Additional Sessions Judge-IX instead of XI, Saran at Chapra. The order is modified to the aforesaid extent. The modification petition stands allowed. Let this order be communicated to the Additional Sessions...
Narendra Kumar and anr Vs. State of Bihar and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-25-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1284 of 2007 (14) dt.25-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1284 of 2007 ====================================================== Narendra Kumar & Anr .... Petitioner/s Versus State Of Bihar & Anr .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA25. 01-2012 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Mr. Pravin Kumar, Advocate, who was earlier appearing in this case on behalf of O.P.No.2 has refused to accept notice. From the endorsement made on the back portion of the notice sent to him by the office of this Court on 3.12.2011 reading as follows: I had appeared in the abovesaid case and after the disposal of the same the client has taken away the file of the abovesaid Cr.Misc.No. 1284/07. Now I have no instruction from the client, even I am aware with the correct address of my client and ...
Harihar Rai Vs. the State of Bihar and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-24-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.16594 of 2010 ====================================================== Harihar Rai, son of late Mahindra Rai, resident of Mohalla-Indrapuri, road No. 2A, house No. 18, Police Station-Patliputra, Town and District-Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar.2. Smt. Bimla Sahay, wife of Ravi Shankar Sahay, resident of Mohalla- Indrapuri, Road No.2A, Police Station-Patliputra, Town and District- Patna. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Baban Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gopesh Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN24. 01-2012 1. The present application has been filed for quashing the order dated 23.12.2009 as regards the petitioner in connection with Patliputra P.S. Case No. 227 of 2009...
Rajesh Yadav Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-24-2012
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40351 of 2011 (3) dt.24-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.40351 of 2011 ====================================================== Rajesh Yadav, S/O-Chandeshwar Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA24. 01-2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State assisted by learned counsel for the informant. Although, there is case and counter case between the parties but it is specific case of the prosecution that this petitioner and co-accused Chandrama Singh assaulted the deceased with lathi. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that deceased has received only one injury on his head. So...
Ranjeet Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-24-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3366 of 2012 Ranjeet Kumar, son of Ghanshyam Rai, resident of village Bhatawna, P.S. Karza district Muzaffarpur .. Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .. Opposite party ---------------------------------- /2/ 24 January, Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the 2012 State. This is a petition for grant of regular bail for offence under Section 366A of the Penal Code. The age of the victim has been assessed below seventeen years by the doctor (Annexure 3). The victim has disclosed her age as eighteen years in her statement under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code. However, the victim in her statement stated that she out of her own sweat will went out of her house without informing the family members and she herself called the petitioner on telephone and when Ranjeet Kumar came she went along with him and solemnized marriage in Punjab. The petitioner is in jail since 15.1.2011. Hence, having regard to the f...
Guru Dayal Giri and anr Vs. Abhai Kumar Jha and ors
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-24-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.1520 of 2011 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6052 of 2006 With Interlocutory application No. 7562 of 2011 In Letters Patent Appeal No. 1520 of 2011 ====================================================== 1. Guru Dayal Giri S/O Late Musafir Giri .2. Sanjit Kumar Giri S/O Late Ramlakhan Giri, All resident of Village-Musapur, P.S.-Musapur, P.O.-Sarairanjan, District-Samastipur. .... .... Interveners-Appellants Versus 1. Abhai Kumar Jha S/O Sita Ram Jha resident of Village-Musapur, P.O.- Musapur, P.S.-Sarairanjan, District-Samastipur. .. Petitioner/Respondent 1st Set.2. The State of Bihar.3. The Collector, Samastipur.4. Sub Divisional Officer, Samastipur, District- Samastipur.5. Anchaladhikari (C.O.) Sarairanjan, Samastipur. .. Respondents/Respondents-II set ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Din Bandhu Mishra, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Nivedita Nirvik...
Abdul Wahid and ors Vs. the State of Bihar and anr
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-24-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.12773 of 2010 ====================================================== 1. Abdul Wahid, S/o Late Abdul Hamid, 2. Munna @ Julfekar Ali, s/o.Abdul Wahid 3. Baharan @ Sanaullah, s/o Late Abdul Gani 4. Irshad Alam @ Irshad Hussain s/o Baharan @ Sanaullah 5. Nurul Haque Mian s/o. Late Abdul Gani 6. Shamim Alam s/o Nurul Haque Mian 7. Afrose Alam s/o Nurul Haque Mian 8. Masud Ahmad s/o Late Muzahid Mian 9. Daud Ahmad s/o Masud Ahmad All are resident of village Inerwa Ebadullah, P.S.Gopalganj, District Gopalganj. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State Of Bihar 2. Kitabuddin Ali s/o Najurullah, resident of village Inerwa Ebadullah, P.S.Gopalganj, District Gopalganj. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh No.1, APP For O.P.No. 2 : Mr. Umesh Kumar Singh, Advocate ==========...
Smt. Janki Devi Vs. Most. Indrasen Devi and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-24-2012
Patna High Court SA No.468 of 2010 (5) dt.24-01-2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Second Appeal No.468 of 2010 ====================================================== Smt. Janki Devi .... .... Appellant/s Versus Most. Indrasen Devi & Ors. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sunil Kr. Verma For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYENDRA NATH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYENDRA NATH24. 01-2012 Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant. The plaintiff is the appellant in this appeal against the judgment and decree of affirmance. It is the admitted case of the parties that the suit property originally belonged to Sahodari Devi. The plaintiff claims her title over the suit property by virtue of the deed of Mahadanama dated 24-4-1991 and pursuant to that deed, deed of sale ...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »