Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ranjeet Kumar Vs. the State of Bihar

Ranjeet Kumar vs The State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided May 24, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/974235

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ranjeet Kumar

Respondent

The State of Bihar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at patna criminal miscellaneous no.3366 of 2012 ranjeet kumar, son of ghanshyam rai, resident of village bhatawna, p.s. karza district muzaffarpur .. petitioner versus the state of bihar .. opposite party ---------------------------------- /2/ 24 january, heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the 2012 state. this is a petition for grant of regular bail for offence under section 366a of the penal code. the age of the victim has been assessed below seventeen years by the doctor (annexure 3). the victim has disclosed her age as eighteen years in her statement under section 164 of the criminal procedure code. however, the victim in her statement stated that she out of her own sweat will went out of her house without informing the family members and she herself called the petitioner on telephone and when ranjeet kumar came she went along with him and solemnized marriage in punjab. the petitioner is in jail since 15.1.2011. hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with musahari p.s. case no. 107 of 2011 to the satisfaction of the chief judicial magistrate, muzaffarpur. ( gopal prasad, j.) s.a.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.3366 of 2012 Ranjeet Kumar, son of Ghanshyam Rai, resident of village Bhatawna, P.S. Karza district Muzaffarpur .. Petitioner Versus The State Of Bihar .. Opposite party ---------------------------------- /2/ 24 January, Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the 2012 State. This is a petition for grant of regular bail for offence under Section 366A of the Penal Code. The age of the victim has been assessed below seventeen years by the doctor (Annexure 3). The victim has disclosed her age as eighteen years in her statement under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code. However, the victim in her statement stated that she out of her own sweat will went out of her house without informing the family members and she herself called the petitioner on telephone and when Ranjeet Kumar came she went along with him and solemnized marriage in Punjab. The petitioner is in jail since 15.1.2011. Hence, having regard to the facts and circumstances, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Musahari P.S. Case No. 107 of 2011 to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur. ( Gopal Prasad, J.) S.A.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial