Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This Crl.P Is Filed U/S.482 Cr.P.C Praying To Quash The Complaint And Fir In Cr. No.77/2011 Dated 10.04.2011 Registered By The First Respondent- Police For The Offence P/U/S 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120b Of Ipc; Which Are Produced As Annexure-A And B Pertaining To The Petitioner.) 1. Accused No.2 in Crime No.77/2011 registered with Chikkanayakanahalli police within the jurisdiction of JMFC Court, Chikkanayakanahalli, has come up in this petition seeking quashing of the complaint registered against him and others for offences punishable under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B of IPC. The prayer in the present petition is confined to the petitioner-second accused. 2. Admittedly, the complaint in Crime No.77/2011 is registered at the instance of second respondent Sri.V.Selvaraj, who is said to be the erstwhile client of petitioner Gururaj Joshi. It is stated by the petitioner that the complaint dated 10.4.2011 is filed against him alleging that petitioner herein, who was ear...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on Bail in Crime No.138/2014 of Kyathasandra P.S., Tumkur District, which is registered for the offences p/u/s. 394 and 397 of I.P.C.) 1. This petition is filed by the petitioner / accused No.1 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking his release on bail for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 394 and 397 of I.P.C. registered by the respondent - Police Station in Crime No.138/2014. 2. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner / accused No.1 and also the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent - State. 3. I have perused the averments made in the bail petition, F.I.R., complaint, order passed by the lower Court on the bail application and also the other materials produced in the case. 4. Looking to the allegation made in the complaint, case of the prosecution in brief that on 24-4-2014 at about 8.30 p.m., while complainant along with her husb...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: These Company Applications Are Filed Under Rules 164 Of The Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 Praying To Set Aside Form No. 69 And Issue Directions To The Official Liquidator To Re- Adjudicate The Claim Of The Appellant By Way Of Admitting Closure Compensation And Gratuity And Under Section 5 Of Limitation Act, R/W Rule 164 Of The Company (Court) Rules, 1959 Praying To Condone 1483 Days Delay In Filing The Application.) ORDER IN C.A.NO.889/2014 1. This application is filed seeking condonation of delay of 1483 days in filing C.A.No.888/2014-. 2. Though there, is inordinate delay, considering the fact that the applicant is a former employee of the Company in liquidation and is presently seeking financial benefits for the period he had rendered services in the Company in liquidation, the delay is necessarily to be condoned. Hence, delay is condoned and the application is allowed. ORDER IN C.A.No.888/2014 3. This application is filed by the applicant claiming to be aggrieved by the re...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF JULY2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.3708/2014 BETWEEN :1. 2. SMT. SHASHIKAL J.SHETTY, W/O JAYARAMA SHETTY .K, AGED ABOUT40YEARS, KEMBERJE HOUSE, BELALU ROAD, UJIRE VILLAGE, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D K DISTRICT-574240. SMT. MEERA T. SHETTY, W/O THARANATH SHETTY .K, AGED ABOUT37YEARS, KUNJARPA HOUSE, UJIRE VILLAGE, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT-574 240. ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI Y.R.SADASHIVA REDDY, SR. COUNSEL FOR SRI SHIVAKUMAR CHANNABASAPPA, ADV.,) AND :1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, VIDHANA SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001, BY ITS SECRETARY.2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KARNATAKA STATE, BANGALORE-560001.3.4. 5.-. 2 - SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, D K DISTRICT, MANGALORE-575 001. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BELTHANGADY CIRCLE, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D K DISTRICT-574 214. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BELTHANGADY POLICE STATION, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D K D...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This RFA is filed under Section 96 of CPC, against the judgment dated 19.3.2010 passed in O.S.No.1572/2005 on the file of the XVII Additional City Civil Judge, (CCH.No.6), Bangalore, dismissing the suit for declaration and permanent injunction.) 1. The legality and correctness of the judgment and decree passed by the XVII Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore dated 19.03.2010, passed in O.S. No.1572/2005 is called in question by the unsuccessful plaintiff. 2. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties. 3. On an earlier occasion, this Court had heard two learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants Sri.Yoga Narasimha and Sri.Raju Ramachandran and the learned Senior Counsel, Sri.C.V.Nagesh for respondents 2(a) to (c) and Sri.Nagaraja Rao, the learned counsel for respondent no.1. After conclusion of the arguments, an application was filed by the appellant under Order-6, Order-17 of C.P.C., to amend the plaint which application was considered and rejected by this Court...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF JULY2014PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH Regular First Appeal No.958 of 2010 (DEC-INJ) BETWEEN: M/s.Kolte Patil Developers Ltd Being a Company incorporated Under the Companies Act 1956 Having its registered office at: Navipeth District Jalagaon Maharastra. And Branch Office at: No.22/11, Vittal Malya Road, 1st Floor, Park West Bangalore 560 001. Represented by its Joint Managing Director Mr.Naresh A.Patil. APPELLANT (By Sri Yoga Narasimha, Senior Advocate and Sri Raju Ramachandran, Sr.Advocate for Sri G.L. Vishwanth, Advocate) 2 AND:1. NTI Housing Co-Operative Society No.5, C Palace Orchards Apartments No.51, RMV Extension 6th Cross, 9th Main road, Bangalore 560 080.2. Sri CVL Shastry S/o late N.Venkatasubba Shastry Aged about 75 years No.73, 9th Main, RMV Extension Bangalore 560 080 *Since deceased by LRs 2(a) Smt.Sharadamma W/o late CVL Shastry Aged about 72 ye...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This Crl.P Is Filed U/S.482 Cr.P.C Praying To A Quash The Endorsement Dated 14.5.2014 Issued By The 5th Respondent At Annexure-B. B) To Direct The City Crime Branch, Mangalore, D.K. District To Take Up The Investigation And Lodge The First Information Report To The Jurisdictional Magistrate Based Upon The Complaint Dated 10.5.2014 At Annexure-A Lodged By The Petrs. With The 5th Respondent.) 1. The petitioners herein are the complainants. The petitioners are said to be the owners of land bearing Sy.No.124/4/B2 and Sy.No.501/3 of Ujire village, Belthangady Taluk, D.K.District. 2. Brief facts leading to this petition are as under: It is stated that at about 8.00 pm., on 9.5.2014 a group of persons headed by one Mr.Mahesh Shetty Thimarody is said to have trespassed in to a portion of aforesaid land belonging to petitioners, which is arecanut plantation. While trespassing, they removed arecanut plantation to an extent of approximately 1 acre of land by cutting and removing 30 areca...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE04H DAY OF MARCH, 2014 BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL No.866/2002 (PAR) BETWEEN:1. Sri. Ningappa S/o. Kallappa Jiregewade Age:57. years 2. Sri. Jampanna S/o. Kallappa Jiregewade Age:52. years 3. Sir. Erappa S/o. Sri. Kallappa Jiregewade Age:37. years, All are R/o. Navalur village Tq. & Dist. Dharwad. (By Sri. B. V. Somapur, Advocate) AND: APPELLANTS Sri. Shankar Self styled as S/o. Kallappa Jiregewade Age:51. years, Now R/a. Gulbarga Railway outpost Since dead Rep. By his legal representatives 2 1(a) Sri. Satish, S/o. Shankar Jiregewade Occ: Private Service, R/o. Dharwad 1(b) Smt. Sunanda, W/o. Gurunath Vaidye Occ: Household, R/o. Hubli 1(c) Sri. Srinivas, S/o. Shankar Jiregewade Occ: Private Service, R/o. Dharwad 1(d) Sri. Shrikanth, S/o. Satish Jadav Occ: Private Service, R/o. Dharwad 1(e) Smt. Surekha, W/o. Satish Jadav Occ: Private Service, R/o. Hubli 1(f) Smt. Surekha, S/o. Nar...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: These appeals are filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 arising out of order dated 8.2.2012 passed in Final Order No.94/2012 and 105/2012 dated 9.2.2012 praying to allow this appeal and set aside the Final Order No.94/2012 dated 8.2.2012 (in common Final Order No.85 to 99/2012 dated 8.2.2012) and 105/2012 dated 9.2.2012 and etc. This appeal is filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 arising out of Order dated 8.2.2012 passed in Final Order No.96/2012 praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to decide the substantial questions of law stated therein and set aside the final order No.96/2012 dated 8.2.2012 passed by the CESTAT, South Zonal Bench, Bangalore and allow the appeal, in the interest of justice and equity. This appeal is filed under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 arising out of Order dated 8.2.2012 passed in Final Order No.85-99/2012 praying to decide the substantial questions of law stated therein and set aside the fi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1. The assessee has preferred this appeal against the order passed by the Tribunal affirming the finding recorded by the Commissioner of Income Tax that the assessee is not entitled to claim deduction under Sec.80IB(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, the 'Act'), as in the 9th year it ceased to be small scale industry. 2. Assessee is a company engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of components/parts of CNC lathes and similar machines. The assessee furnished its return of income, admitting a total income of Rs.1.76 crores which was initially processed under Sec. 143(1) of the Act. Subsequently, the case was subjected to scrutiny under Sec. 143(3) of the Act. The Assessing Officer concluded the assessment, determining the assessee's income at Rs.1,79,82,653/-, after disallowing certain expenses, aggregating to Rs.2.91 lakhs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, by virtue of the power conferred under Sec.263 of the Act, initiated suo moto to proceedings on the ground that the...
Tag this Judgment!