Karnataka Court July 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sakshi @ Shweta Vs. Sunil
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-09-2014
(Prayer: This MFA filed U/S.19 (1) of the family Courts Act, against the judgement and decree dated: 06.02.2013, passed in matrimonial case no.86/2012 on the file of the judge family court at Belgaum, allowing the petition filed U/S.13 (1) (I-A) of Hindu Marriage Act.) 1. This is an appeal filed under Section 19 (1) of the Family Courts Act directed against the judgment and decree of divorce dated 06.02.2013 made in M.C.No.86/2012 on the file of Family Court at Belgaum. 2. Brief facts of the case leading to the filing of the appeal may be stated as under: The appellant (in short, 'the wife') got married to the respondent (in short, 'the husband') on 10.7.2005. Out of the said wedlock, she has given birth to a male child. On 26.3.2012, the respondent filed a petition under Section 13(1)(i-a) (i-b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for dissolution of marriage. On 26.3.2012, notice was ordered to be issued to the wife. As per report of the process server dated 20.4.2012, notice sent to the...
Smt. Sakshi @ Shweta W/O Sunil Raikar Vs. Sri. Sunil S/O Dattaram Raik ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-09-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE9H DAY OF JULY, 2014 PRESENT THE HONBLE DR. JUSTICE K. BHAKTHAVATSALA AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP D.WAINGANKAR M.F.A.No.22031/2013 (FC) BETWEEN: SMT.SAKSHI @ SHWETA W/O SUNIL RAIKAR, AGE26YEARS, OCC:HOUSEWIFE, D/O SRI SADANAND MANJUNATH VERNEKAR, R/O : RUKMINI NAGAR, 1ST CROSS, NEAR MAL-MARUTI EXTENSION, BELGAUM. APPELLANT (BY SRI.V.M.SHEELVANT, ADV.) AND: SRI SUNIL S/O DATTARAM RAIKAR, AGE:39. YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O : HAIBATTI COLONY, CROSS NO.1, OPP SHIVAJI GARDEN, SHAHAPUR, BELGAUM. (BY SRI.V.P.KULKARNI, ADV.) RESPONDENT THIS MFA FILED U/S.19(1)OF THE FAMILY COURTS ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED:06.02.2013, PASSED IN MATRIMONIAL CASE NO.86/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE2JUDGE FAMILY COURT AT BELGAUM, ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S.13 (1) (i-a) OF HINDU MARRIAGE ACT. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, DR.K.BHAKTHAVATSALA J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT This is an appeal filed under Sectio...
Manjunath Vs. Smt P Nethravathi
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-09-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE9H DAY OF JULY2014PRESENT THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE K.L.MANJUNATH AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4034/2012 (MC) BETWEEN: Manjunath S/o Late Bhuteshappa Aged about 33 years Sub-Inspector of Police R/at Bhadravathi Police Station Shimoga 577 301 (By Sri. Bipin Hegde, Advocate) AND: Smt.P.Nethravathi W/o B.Manjunath Aged about 32 years Sub-Inspector of Police Backside of Health Quarters T.B.Circle, Honnali Taluk Davanagere District 575 305 (By Sri.B.V.Gangi Reddy, Advocate) APPELLANT RESPONDENT2This MFA is filed under Section 19(1) of the Trial court Act, R/S Sec.28 of Hindu Marriage Act, against the judgment and decree dated 10.10.2011 passed in M.C.No.5/2009 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Harihar, dismissing the petition filed under Section 13(1)(ia) and (1) (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, for dissolution of marriage. This MFA coming on for this day, K.L.Manjunath J., delivered the follow...
Sri Krishna Ganesh Bhat Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-09-2014
- 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE9H DAY OF JULY2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2276/2014 BETWEEN : SRI KRISHNA GANESH BHAT, S/O GANESH BHAT, AGED ABOUT67YEARS, CEO AND GPA HOLDER OF SRI SRI.RAGHAVESHWARA BHARATHI SWAMIJI, SRI. RAMACHANDRAPUR MUTT, HEAD OFFICE, NO.2A J.P.ROAD, GIRINAGAR, 1ST PHASE, BANGALORE 560 085. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI ASHOK HARENAHALLI, SR. ADV., FOR SRI P.N.MANMOHAN, ADV.,) AND :1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, GIRINAGAR POLICE, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.2. SRI. MALLIKARJUNA PATIL @ PATIL, S/O AMAREGOWDA, AGED ABOUT46YEARS, SARJAPURA, LINGSUGUR TALUK, RAICHUR DISTRICT- 584 101, - 2 - OF INVESTIGATION, SPE, BANGALORE. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI KESHAVA MURTHY, ADDL. SPP FOR R1, SRI TOMY SABASTIAN, SR. ADV., FOR RAVINDRA ADV., FOR R2) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO (i)QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED:2.4.2014 AND THE BAIL BOND OF THE2D RE...
K.C. Shanthi and Others Vs. A.M. Joyappa @ Jaya and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-08-2014
(Prayer: This MFA is filed U/S 173(1) of MV Act against the judgment and award dated: 04/10/2011 passed in MVC No. 130/2010 on the file of the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Virajpet, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation.) 1. This appeal by the appellants-claimants is arising out of the impugned judgment and award dated 04/10/2011 passed in MVC No.130/2010, by the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Virajpet, (hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal' for short), for enhancement of compensation, on the ground that a sum of Rs.2,79,000/- awarded by the Tribunal under different heads, with interest at 6% per annum against the claim of Rs.76,30,000/-, on account of the death of the deceased Sri. Dilip, in the road traffic accident is inadequate. 2. In brief, the facts of the case are: The appellant Nos.1 to 3 are the mother and sisters of the deceased Sri. Dilip. They filed a claim petition bef...
Major Pankaj Rai (Retd) Vs. State of Karnataka, By Principal Secretary ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-08-2014
(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to direct the R-2 to file a complaint against R-7 to R-13 in front of a First Class Magistrate for offences punishable under Sec.18, 19 and 20 of the Act, having regard to the provisions of Sec.21 of the Act preferably within a prescribed time frame of six weeks and etc.) 1. The petitioner - party-in-person has inter alia sought a direction to the respondent No.2 to file a complaint against the respondent Nos.2 to 17 before the First Class Magistrate for the offences punishable under Sections 18, 19 and 20 of the Transplantation of Human Organs and Tissues Act, 1994 ('the said Act' for short) having regard to the provisions of Section 22 (1)(a) of the said Act. 2. Major Pankaj Rai, the petitioner - party-in-person submits that his wife Seema Rai was subjected to the kidney pancreas transplantation without there being any need for the same. He submits that the imposition of surgery was a...
Commissioner of Income-tax, Bangalore Vs. Kundanmal Babulal Jain
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-08-2014
N. Kumar, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the revenue challenging the order passed by the Tribunal, which has upheld the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), where it has held that when the identical income is accepted under VDIS, the same could not be assessed in the hands of the assessee-individual. 2. A search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act (for short hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') was conducted on 21.10.1997 in the case of Sri Kundanmal Babulal - the assessee at his residential premises at No.47, R.T. Street, Chickpet, Bangalore and also at his business premises at No. 14, Devatha Market, Bangalore. Simultaneously, survey under Section 133A of the Act was conducted on 21.10.1997 at the business premises of his son Sri B. Praveen Kumar at No 118, Devatha Market, Bangalore. 3. The assessee is trading in Sarees in proprietary concern in the name of M/s. E, Praveen Kumar at No. 14, Devatha Market, Bangalore. His son is also runni...
Suresh Kumar Vs. S.K. Shreedevi and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-08-2014
(Prayer: This Civil Revision Petition Is Filed Under Section 115 Of The Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908, Praying To Set Aside The Order Dated 07.02.2014 Passed By The Xxxvii Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge (Cch-38), Bangalore City In O.S. No.7363/2009 And Consequently Dismiss The Suit Of The Plaintiff.) 1. Heard the learned Counsel for respective parties. This Revision Petition is filed against the order passed by the XXXVII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore City in O.S. No. 7363/2009. The suit filed by the respondents for declaration and possession and also for permanent injunction came to be allowed by the impugned order en rejection of the plea of res-judicata and also having referred to a decision cited by the Counsel for the petitioner herein who is the defendant No.2 in the suit, which was to be not applicable to the suit. Accordingly, the suit filed by the plaintiff was allowed. 2. It transpires from the records that one Sri. Shankar sold the property to one ...
Shri Suresh Kumar Vs. Smt s.k. Shreedevi
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-08-2014
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE8H DAY OF JULY, 2014 :BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE HULUVADI G. RAMESH C.R.P. NO.110/2014 BETWEEN: Shri. Suresh Kumar S/o Late A.P. Shankar, Aged about 45 years, Residing at No.36/105, Robertson Road Junction, Frazer Town, Bangalore 560 005. ..PETITIONER (BY SRI: PRASANNA KUMAR C.S. FOR KUMAR & KUMAR, ADVS.) AND:1. Smt. S.K. Shreedevi W/o Sri. N. Murali, Aged about 42 years, Residing at No.97/41, 8th Cross, Wilson Garden, Bangalore 560 027.2. Smt. Maheshwari W/o M.S. Gunasheelan, No.56, 1st Main Road, 3rd Cross, Nrupathunga Extension, R.T. Nagar, Bangalore 560 032. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI: K. SURYAPRAKASH RAO, ADV. FOR R-1) 2 THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION115OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED0702.2014 PASSED BY THE XXXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE IN O.S. NO.7363/2009 AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE SUIT OF THE PLAINTIFF. BANGALORE (CCH-38), CITY THIS CIVIL RE...
Parvathamma and Others Vs. Paramesh and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-04-2014
(Prayer: This MFA is filed U/S 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgment and Award dated: 13/11/2012 passed in MVC No. 17/2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Challakere, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation.) 1. Though this appeal is posted for orders, with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for both the parties, the same is taken up for final disposal. 2. This appeal by the claimants is directed against the judgment and award dated 13th November 2012, passed in MVC No. 17/2012, by the Senior Civil Judge and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Challakere, (for short, 'Tribunal') for enhancement of compensation on the ground that, the compensation of Rs.3,50,500/- awarded in favour of the claimants as against their claim for Rs.25,00,000/-, is inadequate. 3. The facts in brief are that, the claimants are the wife, children and mother of the deceased Basavaraj. They filed the claim petitio...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »