Karnataka Court July 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gopal Reddy Sheelum and Others Vs. State Of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-16-2014
(Prayer: Crl.P.No.234/2011 Is Filed Under Section 482 Of The Code Of Criminal Procedure, Praying To Set Aside The Order Dated 04.12.2010 Passed In The Case Directing The Registration Of A Case Against The Petitioner For Offences After Taxing Cognizance Of The Offences 376, 377, 420, 1h, 201, 417 Read With Sections 415, 506(1) And 120-B Of The Ipc, After Taking Cognizance Of The Offences Complained In The Final Report Filed Before The Court And Further Be Pleased To Quash The Proceedings That Are Being Recorded In C C.No.204/2010, Presently Pending On The File Of The Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) and Cjm, Ramanagara District, Ramanagara.) (Prayer: Crl.P.No.4090/2011 Is Filed Under Section 482 Of The Code Of Criminal Procedure, Praying To Quash The Charge Sheet In C.C.No.204/2010 On The File Of The Principal Senior Civil Judge And Cjm, Ramanagaram, For The Offences Punishable Under Sections 376, 377, 420, 114, 201, 417 Read With Sections 415, 506(1), 120(B) Ipc And Consequently Set Aside The Order...
Sri Gopal Reddy Sheelum Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-16-2014
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE16H DAY OF JULY2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.234 OF2011C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4090 OF2011C/W CRIMINAL PETITION No.957 OF2011C/W CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4582 OF2012CRL.P.NO.234/2011: BETWEEN: SRI.GOPAL REDDY SHEELUM, B.E., M.B.A., P.G.D.C.A., ALSO KNOWN AND CALLED AS SRI.NITHYA BHAKTANANDA, AGED ABOUT47YEARS, S/O S.MALLA REDDY, PRESENTLY R/O NITHYANANDA DHYANAPEETA, KALLUGOPANAHALLI VILLAGE, BIDADI HOBLI, RAMANAGAR TALUK, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT. ... PETITIONER. (BY SRI K.RAGHAVENDRA, FOR SRI.C.V.NAGESH ASSOCIATES, ADVS.) AND:1. 2. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BIDADI POLICE STATION, RAMANAGAR DISTRICT. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPECIAL ENQUIRIES, C.I.D., CARLTON HOUSE, 2 PALACE ROAD, BANGALORE. ... RESPONDENTS. (BY SRI.KESHAVA MURTHY, ADDL. SPP) *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* CRL.P.NO.234/2011 IS FILED UNDER SECTION482OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE OR...
Abraham and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Department of Ministry of P ...
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Jul-15-2014
(Prayer: This Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the impugned notices bearing o.SAM/KAM/CHUNAVANE/12/2014-15 in Form-2, dated 21.06.2014 by respondent No.3 alleged to have issued to the petitioners vide Annexures-D, D1 to D3 and issue a direction to the respondent No.3 to issue notices afresh and conduct meeting of No Confidence as per law.) 1. Petitioners are members of the Gram Panchayat, Sirawara village, Manvi Taluk, Raichur District. They are challenging the action of the respondent-Authority in convening the meeting of the Gram Panchayat, to consider the No-confidence Motion moved against the Adhyaksha of the Gram Panchayat. 2. The twin contentions urged by the learned Counsel for the petitioners are, that the impugned notices issued by the 3rd respondent were not served on the petitioners and although they purport to bear the signatures of the petitioners, the said signatures have been forged. The second contention is, that...
L. Premkishore and Others Vs. M/s. Revajeethu Builders Developers and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-15-2014
(Prayer: This Revision Petition is filed under S. 115 of the CPC praying to set aside the orders passed on IA 3 and IA 5 to 7 on 4.12.2002 in OS 226171996 by the 31st Addl. City Civil Judge, Bangalore.) 1. This is a defendants appeal (i.e., defendants 8, 9 and 11-16) challenging the order of rejecting their applications to recali the order dated 9.11.1999 or review the said order allowing the plain tiff/lSl respondent herein to pay the deficit court fee on the prayer for recovery of money and in the alternative for declaration and possession. It transpires that property measuring 5.24 acres in Sy.No.6/1 and 6/2 of Dasarahally, Uttarahally Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk was the subject matter under the Urban Land Ceiling Act (ULCA for short) which was sold m favour of the plaintiff. It appears as there was some illegality committed in granting permission contrary to the provisions of the ULCA, matter reached the Supreme Court where such a transaction was held void on the ground that such ...
L Prem Kishore Vs. M/S Revajeethu Builders Developers
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-15-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE Dated this the 15th day of July, 2014 Before THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE HULUVADI G RAMESH Civil Revision Petition 1415 / 2004 Sri L Premkishore, 51 yrs S/o late B M Lakshmana Murthy R/a # 17, 15th Cross, BEML Layout Basaveshwaranagar, Bangalore Sri L Shailesh, 45 yrs S/o late B M Lakshmana Murthy R/a # 90, 2nd Main Road, 7th Block Jayanagar, Bangalore Smt K Shashirekha, 40 yrs W/o L Prem Kishore R/a # 17, 15th Main, BEML Layout Basaveshwaranagar, Bangalore Between 1 2 3 4 5 Aditya, 17 yrs, S/o Prem Kishore By his father L Prem Kishore R/a with father Smt D Shakunthala, 42 yrs W/o L Shailesh, R/a # 90 2nd Main Road, 7th Block Jayanagar 2 S Shambhavi, 14 yrs D/o L Shailesh Reptd. by her father and Residing with him Smt B Lalitha, 76 yrs W/o late B M Lakshmanamurthy R/a # 90, 2nd Main Road 7th Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore Smt Sarala, 50 yrs D/o late B M Lakshmanamurthy R/a # 12/A, R V Layout K P West, Bangalore 6 7 8 (By Sri M Aswathanarayana Reddy,...
Syed Shafi Quaderi and Others Vs. Syed Jahanger Ali, Ayed Sadat Ali an ...
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Jul-13-2014
(Prayer: This Miscellaneous First Appeal Is Filed Under Section 173(1) Of Motor Vehicle Act, Against The Judgment And Award Dated 20.10.2011 Passed In Mvc No.211/2009 On The File Of The Senior Civil Judge And Motor Accident Claims Tribunal At Humnabad, Wherein Partly Allowing The Claim Petition And Seeking Enhancement Of Compensation.) 1. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act, against the judgment and award dated 20.10.2011 passed in MVC No.211/2009 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Humnabad, partly allowing the claim petition and seeking for enhancement of compensation. 2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the appellants as well as the learned counsel for the respondent No.2, this matter is heard on merits. The material placed before this Court is sufficient to dispose of the matter at this stage. 3. Parties will be referred to with reference to the status in the claims tribunal. 4. The appellants have produced the copies ...
Harsha Enterprises B.H.Road, Malavagoppa and Another Vs. State Of Karn ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-11-2014
(Prayer: These W.Ps Are Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To The Two Provisos As To Section 35(1) By Karnataka Act 40 Of 2010 Be Declared To Be Constitutionally Void As Being Discriminatory And Excessive Delegation Of Legislative Power To The R-2 And Hit By Article 245 and Article 14 and 19(1) Of The Constitution Of India And Being Inconsistent With Section 88 Of Kvat Act And Quash The Notification Annex-A Issued By The R-2 Dtd.29.4.2014 Along With Annex-B,C,D and E.) 1. Petitioners have assailed notification dated 29.4.2014 (Annexure-A) which has been issued by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Karnataka) ("Commissioner'' for the sake of brevity) exercising powers under first proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 35 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act ("Act' for short), 2003. By the said notification, the Commissioner has notified those dealers whose total turnover is fifty lakh rupees and above during tax periods of the year ending 31st day of...
Patel Realty India Limited and Others Vs. State By Hebbagoudi Police S ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-11-2014
(Prayer: These Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Read With Section 482 Of The Code Of Criminal Procedure, Praying To Quash The Complaint Filed By The 2nd Respondent As Per Annxexure - "G" Dated 17.06.2014 And Annexure - "H" Dated 17.06.2014 Leading To The Registration Of The Fir In Crime No.376/2014 By The 1st Respondent - Police.) 1. Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that in these proceedings, "B" report is said to have filed by the first respondent - Police in Crime No.376/2014 registered with Hebbagoudi Police and pending on the file of the JMFC Court, Anekal. In that view of the mater, according to him, these petitions have become infructuous. 2. Sri.M.S.Shyam Sundar, learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 4 would submit to the Court that the respondent Nos.2 and 4 would intend to pursue the dispute between them and the petitioners in Civil Court by initiating appropriate civil proceedings, which ...
Bharathkumar and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-11-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Issue A Writ Of Mandamus To Thee Respondents 2 To 4 To Consider The Representations Given By Petitioners vide Annexures-K, K1, K2 And K3 Dated 18.06.2014 And Annexures-L and Li Dated 24.06.2014, Etc.) 1. The averments in the memorandum of writ petition are in the direction of establishing that petitioners being rate payers and residents of Vijayanagar, to which the CL-2 licence of the 7th respondent when permitted to be transferred by the order, Annexure-E, was seriously opposed on the premise that both the previous place i.e., Basaveswaranagar and the present Vijayanagar, are residential layouts and the locals of Basaveswaranagar too opposed the grant of CL-2 licence. The written representations annexed to the petitions are not only from the petitioners but also from a member of the legislative assembly and the ward corporator of the Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (for short...
Oriental Insurance Co Ltd. Vs. Ramesh and Another
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-11-2014
(Prayer: This MFA Is Filed U/S 30(1) Of W.C. Act Against The Order Dated 09.07.2009 Passed In WCA:NFC:CR: 16/2006 On The File Of The Labour Officer And Commissioner For Workmen Compensation, Sub Division-1, Bangalore, Awarding A Compensation Of Rs. 1,00/761/- With Interest @ 12% P.A.) 1. This appeal is by the Insurer challenging the relationship of employer and employee on the ground that the claimant is none other than the son of the owner of the vehicle in question and that it is a vehicle owned under the family ownership. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant relies upon the decision rendered in GOTTUMUKKALA APPALA NARASIMHA RAJU and OTHERS VS. NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD AND ANOTHER reported in 2007 ACJ 1025 wherein the Apex Court observed that the owner of the vehicle joined hands with the claimant for laying a claim against the Insurance Company and, dismissed the claim petition. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the claimant, inter alia relied upon the decision rendered by this Cou...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »