Court : Karnataka Gulbarga
(Prayer: These Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to, issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, direction, order of similar nature whereby quashing the impugned decision Annexure-A dated 24.4.2014 Bearing No.MPG/NKUSIP/STP/TENDER/BECM/14-15-38, taken by respondent No.2 whereby respondent No.2 rejected the technical bid of the petitioner relating to project in question and further the decision to oust of the petitioner from the zone of consideration and etc.) 1. Petitioners 1 and 2 claim to have a joint venture agreement. Respondent No.2 invited bids for carrying out the work of Design, Supply, Installation, Commissioning and Operation and Maintenance of 40 MLD Sewage Treatment Plant (SBR)/CASP Process Plant at Nandikoor in Gulbarga City as per Notification dated 24.05.2013. As per the tender conditions contained in the bid document at Clause 2.4.2(a) with regard to experience of the bidders for participation, it is stipulated that th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: Crl.P.No.234/2011 Is Filed Under Section 482 Of The Code Of Criminal Procedure, Praying To Set Aside The Order Dated 04.12.2010 Passed In The Case Directing The Registration Of A Case Against The Petitioner For Offences After Taxing Cognizance Of The Offences 376, 377, 420, 1h, 201, 417 Read With Sections 415, 506(1) And 120-B Of The Ipc, After Taking Cognizance Of The Offences Complained In The Final Report Filed Before The Court And Further Be Pleased To Quash The Proceedings That Are Being Recorded In C C.No.204/2010, Presently Pending On The File Of The Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) and Cjm, Ramanagara District, Ramanagara.) (Prayer: Crl.P.No.4090/2011 Is Filed Under Section 482 Of The Code Of Criminal Procedure, Praying To Quash The Charge Sheet In C.C.No.204/2010 On The File Of The Principal Senior Civil Judge And Cjm, Ramanagaram, For The Offences Punishable Under Sections 376, 377, 420, 114, 201, 417 Read With Sections 415, 506(1), 120(B) Ipc And Consequently Set Aside The Order...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE Dated this the 15th day of July, 2014 Before THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE HULUVADI G RAMESH Civil Revision Petition 1415 / 2004 Sri L Premkishore, 51 yrs S/o late B M Lakshmana Murthy R/a # 17, 15th Cross, BEML Layout Basaveshwaranagar, Bangalore Sri L Shailesh, 45 yrs S/o late B M Lakshmana Murthy R/a # 90, 2nd Main Road, 7th Block Jayanagar, Bangalore Smt K Shashirekha, 40 yrs W/o L Prem Kishore R/a # 17, 15th Main, BEML Layout Basaveshwaranagar, Bangalore Between 1 2 3 4 5 Aditya, 17 yrs, S/o Prem Kishore By his father L Prem Kishore R/a with father Smt D Shakunthala, 42 yrs W/o L Shailesh, R/a # 90 2nd Main Road, 7th Block Jayanagar 2 S Shambhavi, 14 yrs D/o L Shailesh Reptd. by her father and Residing with him Smt B Lalitha, 76 yrs W/o late B M Lakshmanamurthy R/a # 90, 2nd Main Road 7th Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore Smt Sarala, 50 yrs D/o late B M Lakshmanamurthy R/a # 12/A, R V Layout K P West, Bangalore 6 7 8 (By Sri M Aswathanarayana Reddy,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Gulbarga
(Prayer: This Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the impugned notices bearing o.SAM/KAM/CHUNAVANE/12/2014-15 in Form-2, dated 21.06.2014 by respondent No.3 alleged to have issued to the petitioners vide Annexures-D, D1 to D3 and issue a direction to the respondent No.3 to issue notices afresh and conduct meeting of No Confidence as per law.) 1. Petitioners are members of the Gram Panchayat, Sirawara village, Manvi Taluk, Raichur District. They are challenging the action of the respondent-Authority in convening the meeting of the Gram Panchayat, to consider the No-confidence Motion moved against the Adhyaksha of the Gram Panchayat. 2. The twin contentions urged by the learned Counsel for the petitioners are, that the impugned notices issued by the 3rd respondent were not served on the petitioners and although they purport to bear the signatures of the petitioners, the said signatures have been forged. The second contention is, that...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This Revision Petition is filed under S. 115 of the CPC praying to set aside the orders passed on IA 3 and IA 5 to 7 on 4.12.2002 in OS 226171996 by the 31st Addl. City Civil Judge, Bangalore.) 1. This is a defendants appeal (i.e., defendants 8, 9 and 11-16) challenging the order of rejecting their applications to recali the order dated 9.11.1999 or review the said order allowing the plain tiff/lSl respondent herein to pay the deficit court fee on the prayer for recovery of money and in the alternative for declaration and possession. It transpires that property measuring 5.24 acres in Sy.No.6/1 and 6/2 of Dasarahally, Uttarahally Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk was the subject matter under the Urban Land Ceiling Act (ULCA for short) which was sold m favour of the plaintiff. It appears as there was some illegality committed in granting permission contrary to the provisions of the ULCA, matter reached the Supreme Court where such a transaction was held void on the ground that such ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Gulbarga
(Prayer: This Miscellaneous First Appeal Is Filed Under Section 173(1) Of Motor Vehicle Act, Against The Judgment And Award Dated 20.10.2011 Passed In Mvc No.211/2009 On The File Of The Senior Civil Judge And Motor Accident Claims Tribunal At Humnabad, Wherein Partly Allowing The Claim Petition And Seeking Enhancement Of Compensation.) 1. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act, against the judgment and award dated 20.10.2011 passed in MVC No.211/2009 on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Humnabad, partly allowing the claim petition and seeking for enhancement of compensation. 2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the appellants as well as the learned counsel for the respondent No.2, this matter is heard on merits. The material placed before this Court is sufficient to dispose of the matter at this stage. 3. Parties will be referred to with reference to the status in the claims tribunal. 4. The appellants have produced the copies ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DATED THIS THE11H DAY OF JULY, 2014 BANGALORE BEFORE: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY WRIT PETITION No.32186 OF2010(LA-BDA) CONNECTED WITH WRIT PETITION Nos.32187/2010 & 34096-34098 OF2010WRIT PETITION No.37886 OF2012WRIT PETITION No.40958 OF2012WRIT PETITION No.43714 OF2012WRIT PETITION Nos.14140-147 OF2010WRIT PETITION Nos.34413-34423 OF2011WRIT PETITION Nos.35445-48 OF2011WRIT PETITION No.33858 & 34282 OF2011WRIT PETITION No.34191 OF2011WRIT PETITION No.22087-102 OF2012WRIT PETITION No.17461 OF2010WRIT PETITION No.40115 OF2010WRIT PETITION Nos.40110-112 OF2010WRIT PETITION No.22375 OF2011WRIT PETITION No.3107 OF2012WRIT PETITION No.19767 OF2010WRIT PETITION No.1753 OF2013WRIT PETITION Nos.17369 OF2010WRIT PETITION Nos.35629 OF2010WRIT PETITION No.35628 OF2010WRIT PETITION Nos.35625-627 OF2010WRIT PETITION No.37316-317 OF2012WRIT PETITION No.42138 OF2012WRIT PETITION Nos.10650-653 OF20112 WRIT PETITION Nos.9830-37 OF2010WRIT PETITION No.328...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act for the Layout called Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout, issued by second and third respondent in respect of schedule property vide Annexure-A and etc; This Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 issued under Section 17(1) and (3) of the BDA Act 1976, vide Annexure-C to the writ petition and also the final notification dated 18.2.2010 vide Annexure-D of the writ petition, issued by the first respondent and etc; This Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the preliminary notification at Annexure-E dated 21.5.2008 published in the Karnataka Gazette dated 21.5.2008, issued under Section 17(1) and (3) and final notification issued under Section 19...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
-1- R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE11H DAY OF JULY, 2014 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA WRIT PETITION NOS.31297-31298/2014 (T-RES) BETWEEN:1. HARSHA ENTERPRISES B.H.ROAD, MALAVAGOPPA, SHIMOGA-577222 BY PROPRIETOR: ABDUL RAHIM S/O MOHAMED IMRAN AGED ABOUT52YEARS2SRI.RAMESHWARA MODERN RICE MILLS KANAKATTE BHADRA COLONY, BHADRAVATHI-577301 BY PROPRIETOR: SRI.BYRE GOWDA, S/O MARISIDDAIAH AGED53YEARS ... PETITIONERS (BY SRI: BABULAL.P.GANDHI, ADV.) AND:1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BANGALORE-560 001 2.THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (KARNATAKA), VTK BUILDING, GANDHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 009 ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI: S.V.GIRI KUMAR, AGA) THESE W.Ps ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES226AND227OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO THE TWO PROVISOS AS TO SECTION351) BY KARNATAKA ACT40OF -2- AND2010BE DECLARED TO BE CONSTITUTIONALLY VOID AS BEING DISCRIMINATORY DELEGATION OF LEGISLATIVE POWER TO THE R-2 AND HIT BY ARTICLE24...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: These W.Ps Are Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To The Two Provisos As To Section 35(1) By Karnataka Act 40 Of 2010 Be Declared To Be Constitutionally Void As Being Discriminatory And Excessive Delegation Of Legislative Power To The R-2 And Hit By Article 245 and Article 14 and 19(1) Of The Constitution Of India And Being Inconsistent With Section 88 Of Kvat Act And Quash The Notification Annex-A Issued By The R-2 Dtd.29.4.2014 Along With Annex-B,C,D and E.) 1. Petitioners have assailed notification dated 29.4.2014 (Annexure-A) which has been issued by the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Karnataka) ("Commissioner'' for the sake of brevity) exercising powers under first proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 35 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act ("Act' for short), 2003. By the said notification, the Commissioner has notified those dealers whose total turnover is fifty lakh rupees and above during tax periods of the year ending 31st day of...
Tag this Judgment!