Court : Karnataka Dharwad
(Prayer: Mfa Filed U/S 173(1) Of Mv Act Against The Judgment And Award Dated 31/1/07 Passed In Mvc No.74/03 The File Of The Member, Addl.Mact, Sirsi, Partly Allowing The Claim Petition For Compensation And Seeking Enhancement Of Compensation.) 1. This appeal by the NWKRTC under Section 173(1) of the M.V.Act is against the judgment and award dated 11.01.2007 in M.V.C.No.74/2003 on the file of the Addl. M.A.C.T., Sirsi. 2. On 06.11.2000, at about 4.00 p.m. the bus bearing registration No.KA-31/F-423 belonging to the appellant while proceeding from Karwar to Bijapur was hit by another bus bearing registration No.KA-29/2610 belonging to respondent No. 1-Chandrashekar Hadli and insured with respondent No.2-New India Insurance Co. Ltd. As a result of the impact, the NWKSRTC bus was substantially damaged. The appellant-NWKSRTC spent an amount of Rs.27,759/- for its repair. The bus was kept idle for 12 days on account of repair and thereby the appellant lost earnings at the rate of Rs.3,500/- ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This RFA is filed under Section 96 of CPC, against the judgment and decree dated 05.12.2012 passed in O.S.No.146/2011 on the file I-Additional Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Shivamoga, partly decreeing the suit for recovery of money.) 1. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 05.12.2012, passed by the First Additional Civil Judge, C.J.M., at Shimoga, in O.S. No.146/2011, partly decreeing the plaintiff's suit for a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Lakhs Only), the defendants have filed the present appeal. 2. The parties will be referred to as per their ranking in the trial court. 3. The case of the plaintiff is that the defendants being the joint owners of the suit property executed an agreement dated 19.07.2008 to sell the same for Rs.75,00,000/- by receiving Rs.14.00,000/- by cheque and Rs.1,00,000/- by cash namely, in all Rs.15,00,000/- towards advance. The defendants had agreed to execute the sale deed within three months after receiving the balance consideration and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This MFA is filed U/S 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgment and Award dated: 13/11/2012 passed in MVC No. 17/2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Challakere, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation.) 1. Though this appeal is posted for orders, with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for both the parties, the same is taken up for final disposal. 2. This appeal by the claimants is directed against the judgment and award dated 13th November 2012, passed in MVC No. 17/2012, by the Senior Civil Judge and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Challakere, (for short, 'Tribunal') for enhancement of compensation on the ground that, the compensation of Rs.3,50,500/- awarded in favour of the claimants as against their claim for Rs.25,00,000/-, is inadequate. 3. The facts in brief are that, the claimants are the wife, children and mother of the deceased Basavaraj. They filed the claim petitio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This MFA is filed U/S 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgment and Award dated: 13/11/2012 passed in MVC No. 17/2012 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Challakere, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation.) 1. Though this appeal is posted for orders, with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for both the parties, the same is taken up for final disposal. 2. This appeal by the claimants is directed against the judgment and award dated 13th November 2012, passed in MVC No. 17/2012, by the Senior Civil Judge and Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Challakere, (for short, 'Tribunal') for enhancement of compensation on the ground that, the compensation of Rs.3,50,500/- awarded in favour of the claimants as against their claim for Rs.25,00,000/-, is inadequate. 3. The facts in brief are that, the claimants are the wife, children and mother of the deceased Basavaraj. They filed the claim petitio...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition Is Filed U/S. 439 Of Code Of Criminal Procedure, Praying To Enlarge The Petitioner On Bail, Who Has Been Arraigned As Accused No.4 In Crime No.100/2014 Of Respondent-Yelahanka New Town Police Station, Bangalore, Which Is Registered For The Offence Under Section 420 R/W 34 Of I.F.C.) 1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner - accused No.4 under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. seeking his release on bail of the alleged offence punishable under Sections 420 r/w 34 of I.P.C. registered in respondent - Police Station Crime No. 100/2014. 2. Heard the arguments of the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner/accused No.4 and also the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent/State. 3. I have perused the averments made in the bail petition, FIR, complaint and the order passed by the Lower Court on the bail application and other materials placed on record. Looking to the averments in the complaint it is alleged that accused No.1 - Govindappa ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition Is Filed U/S. 439 Of Code Of Criminal Procedure, Praying To Release The Petitioner On Bail In Cr. No.139/2014 Of Respondent Cottonpet Police Station, Bengaluru, Registered For Alleged Offence Punishable Under Sections 341, 504, 307 R/W 34 Of I.P.C. Pending On The File Of The Learned Iii Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru.) 1. This is the petition filed by the petitioner - accused No.1 under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. seeking his release on bail of the alleged offences punishable under Sections 341, 504, 307 r/w 3-1 of I.P.C. registered in respondent - Police Station Crime No. 139/2014. 2. Heard the arguments of the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner/accused No.1 and also the Seamed High Court Government Pleader for the respondent/State. 3. I have perused the averments made in the bail petition and other materials produced along with the petition. Looking to the case of the prosecution, as per the averments in the complaint the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of Constitution Of India Praying To Quash The Order Dated 08 05-2012 Passed By The Karnataka State Human Rights Commission, Bangalore, The Certified Copy Of The Order Dated 08-05-2012 Is Produced Vide Annexure-A.) D.H. Waghela, C.J. Oral Order: 1. As recorded in the earlier order dated 27-06-2014, the petition was sought to be withdrawn. However, during the course of hearing, learned counsel for the CHESCOM, joined as respondent herein, has expressed willingness to pay the sum of Rs.2,25,175/- to the respondent. The respondent, Mr.N.Sridhar who lost his four year old son on account of falling of a pole installed by the CHESCOM is now represented by learned counsel, Mr.G.M.Ananaa, appointed by the High Court Legal Services Committee and he has appeared to assist the Court in making further order. 2. Learned counsel, Mr.Anand, has verified the identify of the respondent who is personally present before the Court and has r...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr. No.52/2014 of Jagalur P.S., Davanagere, for the offences P/U/S 498A, 306, 114 r/w Section 34 of IPC and also under Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.) 1. This petition is filed by petitioner/accused No.1 under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking his release on bail of the alleged offences punishable under Sections 498A, 306, 114 r/w Section 34 of IPC and also under Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act registered in respondent-police station Crime No.52/2014. 2. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioners-accused No.l and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State. 3. I have perused the averments made in the bail petition, T^IR, complaint, order passed by the lower Court on the bail application and also the entire charge sheet material produced by the learned counsel for the petitioner along with the pet...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition Is Filed U/S. 439 Of Code Of Criminal Procedure, Praying To Enlarge The Petitioners On Bail In Cr. No.280/2014 Pending Before X Acmm, Bangalore, Registered By The Respondent Mahadevapura Police For The Offences Punishable Under Sections 306 And 347 Of I.P.C.) 1. This is the petition filed by the petitioners - accused Nos.1 and 2 under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. seeking their release on bail of the alleged offences punishable under Sections 306 and 347 of I.P.C. registered in respondent - Police Station Crime No. 280/2014. 2. Heard the arguments of the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners/accused and also the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent/State. 3. Counsel for the petitioners during the course of arguments submitted that the deceased was due to pay a sum of Rs.5.00 lakhs to the petitioners and in that connection the deceased issued two cheques for the payment of the said amount and when the petitioners presented those t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
(Prayer: These criminal petitions are filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in RC Nos.13(A)/2012, 14(A)/2012 and 15(A)/2012 of CBI/ACB, Bangalore City, respectively pending under Spl. C.C. NO.21/2014 on the file of the XLVI Addl. City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge for CBI Cases, Bangalore for the offences punishable under Sections 409, 420, 434, 379, 411, 447, 467, 468 and 471 read with Section 120-B of IPC and under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) and 13(1)(c) of Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 and under Section 21 read with 4(1) and 4(1)(A) and 23 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act 1957 and Section 24 of Karnataka Forest Act.) 1. These petitions are filed by the petitioner under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking his release on bail of the alleged offences punishable under Sections 409, 420, 434, 379, 411, 447, 467, 468 and 471 read with Section 120-B of IPC and under Section 13(2) read with Section 13...
Tag this Judgment!