Karnataka Court July 2014 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kumara Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-21-2014
(Prayer: This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr. No.212/2014 of Harohalli P.S., Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District, for the offences P/U/S 370 of IPC and Sections 23 and 26 of Juvenile Justice Act and Sections 16, 17 and 18 of Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act.) 1. This petition is filed by petitioner/accused under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking his release on bail of the alleged offences punishable under Sections 370 of IPC and under Sections 23 and 26 of the Juvenile Justice Act and Sections 16, 17 and 18 of the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976 registered in respondent- police station Crime No.212/2014. 2. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and also the learned Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State. 3. As per the allegations in the complaint the case of the prosecution in brief is that on 11.6.2014 at about 10.00 a.m. one Sri.Esthar Denial, the ...
Venkatesh S. Iyer Vs. D.B. Jatti
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-21-2014
1. The petitioner has filed this civil miscellaneous petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the Act), for appointment of an Arbitrator to resolve the dispute which has arisen out of the agreement to sell at Annexure-A, dated 17-1-2011. 2. The petitioner contends that he has entered into an agreement to sell at Annexure-A, dated 17-1-2011 for purchase of a Villa for total consideration of Rs.1,10,00,600/- inclusive of Value Added Tax, Service Tax, and all amenities but excluding registration and stamp duty. He has paid an advance sum of Rs.3,50,000/- by way of two separate cheques dated 5-12-2010 and 30-12-2010. It was agreed that balance of sale consideration has to be paid within thirty days from the date of the agreement. 3. It is further contended that the petitioner applied for loan from L.I.C.H.F.L. and the loan was sanctioned in a sum of Rs.30 lakhs. The petitioner informed his willingness to proceed with the registration of the Vil...
Chamundeshwari Mahila Mandali Vs. The Commissioner for Food and Civil ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-21-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Appeal is filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, praying to set aside the Order passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 13003/2012 dated 01/08/2012.) 1. The appellant is a Mahila Mandali, represented by its Secretary. Appellant, questioning the correctness or otherwise of the order impugned passed by the learnedSingle Judge, in Writ Petition No. 13003/2012 (GM-EC) dated 1st August 2012, has presented this writ appeal. 2. In the said writ petition, the appellant herein had sought for quashing of the order dated 31st March 2012 passed by the Commissioner for Food and civil Supplies, in Appeal No.CFS Appeal. 140/2010-11 vide Annexure A to the writ petition and confirm the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Mandya District, Mandya. 3. The said writ petition was dismissed by the learned Single Judge, holding that the allegations made against the appellant were found to be proved by the first Appellate Authority and based on such prove...
B. Krishna Bhat Vs. Vishwabharath and Others
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-21-2014
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 and 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Quash/ Set-Aside The Order Dated 7 May 2014 Passed On I.A. In Case Revision No. 14/2014 By The Karnataka Appellate Tribunal, Vide Annexure-J, Etc.) 1. This petition is filed calling in question the rejection of petitioner's LA. in Revision Petition No. 14/2014 by order dated 07th May 2014, of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal ('KAT' for short), Annexure-J. 2. According to the learned Counsel for petitioner, revision petitioner when arraigned as respondent in a dispute invoking Section 70(1)(a) of the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, ('the Act' for short) instituted by respondent No.1, Co-operative Society advanced objections over maintainability of the petition and requested the authority to frame a preliminary issue. 3. The dispute brought before the authority was over mis-appropriation of funds of the Co-operative Society, a matter touching upon the management and busines...
Sri Chamundeshwari Mahila Vs. The Commissioner for Food
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-21-2014
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE21T DAY OF JULY, 2014, : PRESENT : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE N.K. PATIL AND THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. SREENIVASE GOWDA WRIT APPEAL No.6330 OF2012(GM-EC) Between: Sri. Chamundeshwari Mahila Mandali, Dyapsandra, Basaralu Hobli, Keragodu Post, Mandya Taluk & District, Pin-571 401. Represented by its Secretary, Smt. Shobha, W/o. Chikkalingegowda. (By Shri. M.R. Rajagopal, Advocate) And:1. The Commissioner for Food & Civil Supplies, ... Appellant Cunningham Road, Bangalore-560 001.2. The Deputy Commissioner, Mandya District, Mandya-571 401.3. The Tahasildar, Mandya Taluk, Mandya District-571 401. 2 4. Lingaraju, S/o. Lingegowda, Aged about 41 years.5. Suresh, S/o. Lingegowda, Aged about 31 years.6. Borappa, S/o. Chikkappa Hegde, Aged about 31 years. Respondent Nos.4 to 6 are R/o. Dyapasandra, Basaralu Hobli, Keragodu Post, Mandya Taluk & District, Pin-571 401. (By Shri. R.B.Satyanarayan Singh, HCGP for R1 to R3) ... Respondents ****...
Shamanur Shivashankarappa Vs. M/s. India Sugars And Refineries Ltd.
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-18-2014
(Prayer: These Criminal Petitions Are Filed U/S 482 Of Cr.P.C. Seeking To Quash The Proceedings In (1) C.C.No.243/2013 (Pcr No.1/2010), (2) C.C.No.244/2013 (Pcr No.2/2010) (3) C.C.No.242/2013 (Pcr No.19/2010) Pending On The File Of The Prl. Civil Judge and Jmfc Court, Hospet, Vide Annexure-A, Against The Petitioner.) 1. The petitioner who is common in Crl.P.Nos.100575, 100576 and 100577 of 2014 has sought for quashing of the entire proceedings in CC No.243/2013 (PCR No.1/2010), CC No.244/2013(PCR No.2/2010) and CC No.242/2013(PCR No.19/2010) respectively on the file of Prl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Hospet, wherein, the petitioner is arrayed as Accused No.4, who is one of the Directors of M/s.Davangere Sugar Company Limited., and Chairman of M/s.Shamanur Sugars Limited. 2. Looking at the array of the petitioner in the above said cases, it is revealed that in Crl.P. No.100575/2014 and Crl.P. No.100576/2014, the petitioner challenges the order of the learned Magistrate in taking cognizance a...
Fakkirawwa Vs. Ashok and Another
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-18-2014
(Prayer: These Writ Petitions Are Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India Praying To Quash Order Dated 05/02/2013 In O.S.No.94/2011 On I.A.No.6 And 7 Passed By The Court Of The Iii Additional Civil Judge(Junior Division) Dharwad At Dharwad Vide Annexure G And Reject The Applications Vide Annexure C And D Dated 20/06/2012 And Etc.) 1. The trial Court, by the impugned common order dated 5.2.2013, allowed I.As.VI and VII filed under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure by the plaintiff in O S No.94/2011 on the file of III Addl. Civil Judge, at Dharwad. 2. There is no illegality in the impugned order passed on I.A-VI permitting the plaintiff to correct survey number in the Plaint. What is seriously challenged by the petitioner/defendant in this case is the order passed on I.A-7 filed under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC directing the defendants to correct the survey number mentioned in the agreement of sale as 63/A/2 instead of 63/2A. 3. Learned Counsel for the pe...
M/s. M.K. Agro Tech (P) Ltd. Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-17-2014
(Prayer: These STRPS Filed Under Sec.65(1) Of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act., Against The Judgment And Order Dated:06.04.2013 Passed In Sta.No.638 To 658/2011 On The File Of The Karnataka Appellate Tribunal At Bengaluru, Dismissing The Appeals.) 1. The assessee has preferred this revision petition against the order passed by the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal holding that the assessee is not entitled to full input tax credit, as the residue Sunflower De-oiled Cake is not liable for tax. 2. The assessee is a private limited company, which is engaged in extraction and sale of refined Sunflower Oil from Sunflower Oil Cake by employing solvent extraction process. It is also engaged in trading in edible oils to some extent. It has three units namely solvent extraction processing unit, refining unit and trading unit. It is registered as a dealer under the provisions of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as the 'KVAT Act') and also under the provisions of the Centr...
Smt Rudravva W/O Channabasappa Morab Vs. Smt Suma W/O K Purandarshetty
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-17-2014
R.S.A.No.84/2007 1 C/W R.S.A.No.85/2007 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE17h DAY OF JULY2014BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA R.S.A. NO.84/2007 C/W R.S.A. NO.85/2007 R.S.A. NO.84/2007 BETWEEN:1. 2. 3.4.5. SMT RUDRAVVA W/O CHANNABASAPPA MORAB AGED ABOUT76YRS, HOUSEHOLDER R/O MATTI VONI,HUBLI. SMT SAROJA W/O GIRIMALLAPPA MORAB AGED ABOUT47YRS, HOSUEHOLDER R/O MATTI VONI HUBLI SMT BHARATHI W/O CHANDRAKANTH MORAB AGED ABOUT30YRS, HOUSEHOLDER R/O MATTI ONI HUBLI KUMARI ANNAPURNA D/O GIRIMALLAPPA MORAB AGED ABOUT25YRS HOUSEHOLDER R/O MATTI VONI, HUBLI KUMARI VIDYA D/O GIRIMALLAPPA MORAB AGED ABOUT21YRS HOUSEHOLDER R.S.A.No.84/2007 2 C/W R.S.A.No.85/2007 6.7. R/O MATTI VONI, HUBLI KUMARI MEGHA D/O GIRIMALLAPPA MORAB AGED ABOUT21YRS HOUSEHOLDER R/O MATTI VONI, HUBLI KUMAR VINAYKUMAR S/O GURUMALLAPPA MORAB AGED ABOUT21YRS HOUSEHOLDER R/O MATTI VONI, HUBLI. (BY SRI.K.L.PATIL : SMT. S.S.BETURMATH, ADV.,) ... APPELLANTS AND1 2. 3.4. SMT SUMA W/O K PURAND...
S.N. Enviro-Tech Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi and Another Vs. Managing Directo ...
Court: Karnataka Gulbarga
Decided on: Jul-16-2014
(Prayer: These Petitions are filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to, issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, direction, order of similar nature whereby quashing the impugned decision Annexure-A dated 24.4.2014 Bearing No.MPG/NKUSIP/STP/TENDER/BECM/14-15-38, taken by respondent No.2 whereby respondent No.2 rejected the technical bid of the petitioner relating to project in question and further the decision to oust of the petitioner from the zone of consideration and etc.) 1. Petitioners 1 and 2 claim to have a joint venture agreement. Respondent No.2 invited bids for carrying out the work of Design, Supply, Installation, Commissioning and Operation and Maintenance of 40 MLD Sewage Treatment Plant (SBR)/CASP Process Plant at Nandikoor in Gulbarga City as per Notification dated 24.05.2013. As per the tender conditions contained in the bid document at Clause 2.4.2(a) with regard to experience of the bidders for participation, it is stipulated that th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »