Jharkhand Court July 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Basu Surin Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
Criminal Revision No. 396 of 2002 Against the judgment dated 17.06.1999 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 34 of 1999 by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge at Chaibasa, affirming the judgment of conviction and the order of sentence dated 26.03.1999 passed by learned 2nd Assistant Sessions Judge, Chaibasa in Sessions Trial No. 296 of of 1994 Basu Surin Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) Opposite Party ---- PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY For the Petitioner : Mr. R. P. Gupta, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sudhanshu Kr. Deo, APP C.A.V. On 09.05.2017 Delivered On 17.07.2017. ---- Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.:1. Heard Mr. R. P. Gupta, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner and learned Mr. Sudhanshu Kumar Deo, learned A.P.P. for the State.2. This application is directed against the judgment dated 17.06.1999 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 34 of 1999 by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge at Chaibasa, whereby and whereunder, the judgment of conviction and the...
Pokhan Mahto and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
Cr. Revision No. 424 of 2002 --------- Against the judgment dated 07.08.2002 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Giridih in Cr. Appeal No. 116 of 1985 affirming the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 12.07.1985 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Giridih in G.R. No. 940 of 1980. --------- 1. Pokhan Mahto, S/o Churaman Mahto, R/o Village- Amjo, P.S.- Bengabad, District- Giridih 2. Gura Mahto, S/o Late Hari Mahto, R/o Village- Ambatanr, P.S.- Bengabad, District- Giridih.3. Kunjo Singh, S/o Late Kartik 4. Jago Singh, S/o Latu Singh 5. Sahdeo Singh, S/o Late Janki Singh 6. Deoki Mahto, S/o Pokhan Mahto 7. Kartik Mahto, S/o Sewak Mahto 8. Sukhdeo Singh, S/o Late Kartik Singh 9. Babulal Mahto, S/o Late Gaso Mahto 10. Thakur Singh, S/o Nunulal Singh 11. Tulsi Mahto, S/o Late Churaman Mahto All resident of village- Amjo, P.S.- Bengabad, District- Giridih. ... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party --------- For the Pet...
Vikash Sao Alias Vikash Kumar Sao Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 903 of 2017 --- Vikash Sao @ Vikash Kumar Sao, son of Munshi Sao, Resident of village Patratu Basti, Post Office and Police Station Patratu, District Ramgarh Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opp. Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. A. K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate For the Opp. Party : Ms. Lily Sahay, A.P.P. --- 03/17.07.2017 Heard Mr. A. K. Kashyap, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and Ms. Lily Sahay, learned A.P.P., for the State. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the order dated 28.02.2017 passed by the learned Principal District & Sessions Judge, Ramgarh in Criminal Revision No. 9 of 2017 whereby and whereunder the order dated 31.01.2017 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ramgarh in Patratu P.S. Case No. 91 of 2015 by which the prayer for bail of the petitioner under Section 167(ii) of the Cr.P.C. has bee...
Union of India Through the Controller of Communication Accounts Alias ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.2034 of 2017 Union of India through the Controller of Communication Accounts @ Controller of Telecom Accounts, Jharkhand .... .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. Parasnath Singh 2. The Chief General Manager, B.S.N.L., Jharkhand Telecom, Circle, Ranchi 3. The Telecom District Manager, B.S.N.L., Daltonganj .... .... .... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. B. MANGALMURTI For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Sinha, A.S.G.I. Mr. Niraj Kumar, Advocate For the Res. 1 : Mr. Rishikesh Giri, Advocate For the Res. 2&3 : Mr. Arvind Kumar Jha, Advocate 05/17.07.2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, applicants/respondents and the counsel for the respondent-BSNL.2. The applicant approached the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Circuit Bench at Ranchi in O.A. No.219 of 2014(R) with a prayer to direct the respondent-BSNL and its authorities to pay simple interest @ 18% from the date of his retirement t...
Wakil Chand Mahto and Anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
Criminal Revision No. 482 of 2001 Against the judgment dated 22.08.2001 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 2000 by the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Giridih --- 1.Wakil Chand Mahto S/o Late Ram Tahal Mahto R/o Isri Bazar, PS Nimiaghat, District Giridih 2.Ram Lal Saw, S/o Sri Mohan Saw, R/o Village Ranga Mati, PS Nimiaghat, District Giridih Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Chetan Rajwar S/o LatePahla Rajwar R/o Village Kathwara, PS Pirtand, District Giridih Opposite Parties --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party No. 1 : Mr. Sudhanshu Kumar Deo, A.P.P. --- Present: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- 17.07.2017 Heard Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Sudhanshu Kumar Deo, learned A.P.P. for the State.2. This application is directed against the judgment dated 22.08.2001 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 29 of 2000 by the learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Giridih whereby and whereunde...
Santosh Kumar Singh Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 611 of 2015 --- Santosh Kumar Singh S/o Talukdar Singh, resident of village Baghnari P. S. Barsathi District Jaunpur Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Mahatam Singh son of late Cheddi Singh resident of vill- Chandvi, P.O. and P. S. Kudara Dist Kaimur (Bihar) Opp. Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. R. S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate --- 09/17.07.2017 Heard Mr. R. S. Mazumdar, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Gautam Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties. This application is directed against the order dated 01.05.2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge I, Simdega in Simdega P. S. Case No. 77 of 1996 whereby and whereunder the discharge application preferred by the petitioner has been rejected. It has been stated by the learned senior counsel for the petitioner that ...
Laxmi Chatterjee and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 620 of 2017 1.Laxmi Chatterjee 2.Mithu Ghoshal 3.Purnashish Ghoshal 4.Itu Mukharjee @ Itu Mukherji 5.Kumkum Mukherjee @ Kumkum Mukherji.. Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. .. Respondents --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Appellants : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Singh, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Afaque Rashidi, Advocate. --------- 05/Dated:17. 07/2017 List this case along with A.B.A. No. 595 of 2017. Till then, interim relief granted earlier shall continue. (Anant Bijay Singh, J.) Sunil/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 407 of 2017 Suresh Saw @ Chhoti Saw @ Suesh Saw .. Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. .. Respondents --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Appellant : Mr. A.K. Sahani, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. S.K. Murty, Advocate. --------- 05/D...
Subhash Kumar Ram and Ors Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 421of 2017 ---- 1. Subhash Kumar Ram, S/o Ram Chandra Ram.2. Ram Chandra Ram, S/o late Parmeshwar Ram.3. Brinda Devi, W/o Ram Chandra Ram, R//o village-Barachak, P.O. & P.S. Barachak, District-Burdwan (W.B.). ....Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .....Opposite Party ---- Coram: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ---------- For the Petitioners: Mr. Nityanand Prasad Choudhary, Advocate For the State : APP For the Informant : Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate ----- 03/17/07/2017 Heard the parties. This application is directed against the order dated 16.2.2017 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1, Jamtara in Jamtara P.S. Case No. 353 of 2015, whereby and whereunder the charge has been altered under the provisions of Section 216 Cr.P.C. to 366A and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 10 of the POCSO Act. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the charge was altered at the inst...
Chhathan Alias Chhathan Ansari Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No. 210 of 2014 ---- Chhathan @ Chhathan Ansari, Son of late Bifan Ansari, Resident of Village-Loto, P.O. P.S. & District-Garhwa. ....Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. Taj Mohammad Seikh, Son of late Ali Seikh, Chaukidar No. 3/11, Resident of village-Dhanakdiha, P.O. P.S. and District-Garhwa ( Informant). .....Respondents ---- Coram: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Advocate For the State : J.C. to G.P. II ----- 26/17.07.2017 Heard the parties. In this application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 5.8.2014 and 5.7.2014, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Garhwa in S.T. No. 169 of 2010 and S.T. No. 112 of 2012 whereby and whereunder application preferred by the petitioner under section 91 of Cr.P.C. and under section 233 (2) of Cr.P.C. had been rejected. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that three ki...
Jai Ram Mahto and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Revision No. 582 of 2002 --- 1. Jai Ram Mahto son of Bishnu Prasad Mahto 2. Nundeo Mahto son of Bishnu Prasad Mahto 3. Dineshwar Mahto son of Bishnu Prasad Mahto 4. Rupchand Mahto son of Bishnu Prasad Mahto 5. Chandar Mahto son of Shambhu Mahto 6. Kamdeo Mahto son of Chander Mahto 7. Mahadeo Mahto son of Bishnu Prasad Mahto, all resident of village Latan Tilaya, except Sl. Nos. 5 and 6 they are resident of village Jaruwadih, Police Station Sarwan, District Deoghar Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand Opp. Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Ashish Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Ashok Kumar, A.P.P. --- C.A.V. on 13.04.2017 Pronounced on 17.07.2017 Heard Mr. Ashish Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Ashok Kumar, learned A.P.P., for the State. This application is directed against the judgment dated 26.06.2002 passed by the learned 3rd Additiona...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »