Jharkhand Court July 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kali Prasad Singh Vs. Union of India and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 3247 of 2005 Kali Prasad Singh, son of Sri Bindra Prasad Singh, resident of village Pipri, P.O. & P.S. Allipur, District Sultanpur (U.P). .. .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Union of India. 2.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Central Industrial Security Force, Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., Dhanbad.3. The Commandant, Central Industrial Security Force, Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., Dhanbad. . .. . Respondents --------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK ---------- For the Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Prashant Vidyarthi, Adv. ----------- th CAV on 4 January, 2017 Pronounced on 25/07/2017 Per Pramath Patnaik, J.:1. Challenging the impugned order dated 08.11.2001 passed by the Commandant-respondent no.3, pertaining to removal from services and the order dated 15.02.2002 passed by the appellate authority i.e. D.I.G of Police, respondent no.2, confirming the order passed by the disciplinary authorit...
Binay Kumar Prasad Vs. Road Construction
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-25-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 7483 of 2016 ============================================================= Binay Kumar Prasad, son of late Raghunandan Prasad, resident of village Gandhi Tola (New Colony), Chaibasa, P.O. & P.S. Chaibasa Sadar, District West Singhbhum. Petitioner VERSUS1 The State of Jharkhand.2. The Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi.3. The Superintendent Engineer, Road Construction Department, Path Circle, Jamshedpur.4. The Executive Engineer, Road Construction Department, Path Pramandal, Chaibasa. ... Respondents. ============================================================= For Petitioner : Mr. Suraj Kumar, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Rahul Kumar, JC to SC-II ============================================================= CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK05 25.07.2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.2. The petitioner has approached this Court with a p...
Teklal Mahto Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-24-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 1569 of 2006 (Against the Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence dated 22.07.2006 passed by the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C., Dhanbad, in S.T No. 310 of 2004 / 67 of 2005.) -------- Teklal Mahto ... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Respondent -------- CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Arwind Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, A.P.P. ------ 05/ 24.7.2017 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State.2. The appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence dated 22.07.2006 passed by the learned 6 th Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C., Dhanbad, in S.T No. 310 of 2004 / 67 of 2005, whereby, the sole appellant has been found guilty and convicted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. Upon hearing on the point of sentence, the appe...
Sunita Singh Vs. Kunal Singh
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-24-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F.A. No. 71 of 2016 --- Sunita Singh --- ---- Appellant Versus Kunal Singh --- --- Respondent --- CORAM:The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh The Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.B. Mangalmurti For the Appellant: Mrs. A.R. Choudhary, Advocate For the Respondent: M/s Satish Kr. Ughal, Tapas Kabiraj, Advocates --- 11/ 24.07.2017 Heard counsel for the parties.2. Appellant is the wife aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 16.04.2016 / 29.04.2016 of judicial separation granted by the Learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Seraikella-Kharsawan in Matrimonial Suit No. 11/2008. The suit was preferred by the husband / Respondent herein for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce under section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.3. Parties participated in the mediation process during the pendency of the appeal pursuant to the order dated 18.10.2016. However, efforts for an amicable settlement failed during mediation. Both parties appeared ther...
Nawlesh Kumar Sinha Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-24-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S). No. 86 of 2010 ============================================================= Nawlesh Kumar Sinha, son of late Badri Nath Sinha, resident of Mohalla Kani Bazar, K.B. Road, P.O. Hazaribagh, P.S. Sadar, District Hazaribagh. Petitioner VERSUS1 The State of Jharkhand.2. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner and Secretary, Industries Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.3. The Chief Executive Officer, Bihar State Khadi Gramodhyog Board, Mahesh Bhawan, Gandhi Maidan (East), Patna.4. The District Officer, Khadi Gramodhyog Board, Radium Road, P.O. Ranchi, P.S. Sadar, District Ranchi. ... Respondents. ============================================================= For Petitioner : Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate For State of Jharkhand : Mr. Sunil Singh, Advocate For State of Bihar : Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Advocate ============================================================= CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK07 24.07.2017 Heard learned co...
Raghunath Ram Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-24-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (L) No. 2733 of 2016 Raghunath Ram son of Late Bilar Ram, Resident of Baramuri, P.O. B. Polytechnic, P.S. & Dist. Dhanbad Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The General Manager, P.B. Area No. 7 of M/s Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. P.O. Kusunda, Dist. Dhanbad, 826016 Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Abdul Kalam Rashidi, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. A.K. Das, Advocate --- 6/24.07.2017 Present writ petition has been filed for quashing of judgment dated 08.04.2016, passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Dhanbad in M.J.Case No. 15 of 2015 and also for a direction upon respondent no. 2 to pay dues of domestic coal supply in terms of 12 baskets per month w.e.f. January 1997 to February 2014.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had filed an application under Section 33 C (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred as the 'Ac...
Ravan Murmu Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-24-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI CRIMINAL APPEAL (D.B.) No. 1539 of 2007 -------- [Arising out of the Judgment of conviction and Order of Sentence dated 29 th day of September 2007, passed by 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, Jamtara, in Sessions Case No.16 of 2006 / 67 of 2005] ----- Ravan Murmu Appellant -versus- State of Jharkhand Respondent ----- PRESENT : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ---- For the Appellant : Ms. Bharti Kumari, Amicus Curiae For the Respondent : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, A.P.P. ------ By Court.:- Heard Ms. Bharti Kumari, learned amicus curiae appointed by this Court for the appellant, and the learned counsel for the State.2. The appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence dated 29th September, 2007, passed by learned 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Jamtara, in Sessions Case No.16 of 2006 / 67 of 2005, whereby the sole appellant has been found guilty and convicted for the offences un...
Subhankar Biswas Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-24-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 547 of 2017 with Cr. M. P. No. 557 of 2017 with Cr. M. P. No. 586 of 2017 with Cr. M. P. No. 603 of 2017 --- Subhankar Biswas S/o Shri Sankar Nath Biswas at present posted as Circle Head, Retail Branch Banking Jharkhand Region, HDFC Bank Ltd., having office at Circular Road, Lalpur, PO Lalpur, PS Lalpur, District Ranchi Petitioner (in Cr.M.P. No. 547/2017) Rajeev Sen Gupta S/o Late T. Sengupta, Age 55 years at present posted as Executive Vice President Infrastructure HDFC Bank Ltd., having office at HDFC Bank House, Lower Parel, PO Senapati Bapat Marg, Dadar West, PS N.M., Joshi Marg, District Mumbai ... ... Petitioner (in Cr.M.P. No. 557/2017) Sankar Saha S/o Jadab Chandra Saha, Age 45 years at present posted as Deputy Vice-President - Infrastructure, HDFC Bank Ltd, having office at 8/24 Salco Centre, Richmond Road, PO Richmond Road, PS Ashok Nagar, District Banglore, Banglore, Karnataka ... ... Petitioner (in Cr.M.P. No. 586/...
Mineral Area Development Autho Vs. Premanand Tiwari
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-24-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(L) No. 4886 of 2008 Mineral Area Development Authority, Dhanbad, a Body Corporate constituted under Bihar Coal Mining Area Development Authority Act, 1986 having its head office at Luby Circular Road, P.O. & P.S. Dhanbad, Town & DistrictDhanbad, through its Managing Director namely, Md. Badruzzaman Ansari, son of Late Abdul Ghaffar Ansari, resdient of MADA Bunglow, L.C. Road, Hirapur, Dhanbad, P.O., P.S., Town & DistrictDhanbad Petitioner Versus Premanand Tiwari, son of Late Ram Ganesh Tiwari, resident of MauzaJ.C. Malick Road, P.S.Hirapur, P.O. & DistrictDhanbad. At present posted as Khalasi under Mineral Area Development Authority, Dhanbad ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the PetitionerMADA : Mr. Bhawesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocate For RespondentWorkman : Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate Order No. 06 Dated: 24.07.2017 Heard...
Ms Aahaa Planners and Developers Pvt Ltd Through Its Managing Director ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-21-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Arbitration Application No. 7 of 2017 M/s. Aahaa Planners and Developers Private Limited ..... Petitioner vs. 1. Hasan Rizvi Saba 2. Hasan Razi Arsi 3. Ali Raza Zaidi 4. Kaifi Azmi 5. Aariz Raza 6. Kasif Raza ......Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Prashat Pallav, Adv. For the Respondents : Ms. Pushpa Kumari, Adv. 08/21.7.2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioner has sought appointment of Arbitrator invoking Clause 29 of the agreement dated 13th September, 2008 under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. On 7th July, 2017 after hearing the counsel for the parties and upon consideration of rival pleadings and enclosures, the following order was passed proposing the appointment of Second Arbitrator in terms of Clause29 of the agreement, namely, Mr. G.M....
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »