Jharkhand Court July 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Chinta Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-19-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 4685 of 2016 Chinta Devi, W/o Late Murlidhar Mahto, R/o Shampur, Haripur Garbanna, Godda Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Godda 3. The District Superintendent of Education-cum-District Program Office, Jharkhand Education Project, Godda 4. The Block Development Officer, Godda Block, Godda 5. The Block Education Extension Officer, Godda 6. The President, Gram Shiksha Samitee, Raitola for Upgraded School, Mal Bhadrain, Godda 6. The Secretary-cum-Head Master, Gram Shiksha Samitee Raitola for Upgraded School, Mal Bhadrain, Godda. ... Respondents. =============================================================== For Petitioners : Mrs. Abha Verma, Advocate For Respondents : Mrs. Nilam Tiwari, Advocate =============================================================== CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK05 19.07.2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondent...
Dinesh Kumar Sinha Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-19-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 501 of 2010 .. Dinesh Kumar Sinha . Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, officiating from Project Building P.O Dhurwa P.S. Dhurwa, Ranchi 3. The Chief Engineer, Minor Irrigation Department, Govt. of Jharkhand officiating from Project Building P.O Dhurwa P.S. Dhurwa, Ranchi 4. The Superintending Engineer Minor Irrigation Circle Office at Hazaribagh 5. The Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Division office at Chatra . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S.N. PATHAK For the Petitioner : Ms. Sitakchi, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Sunil Kumar, JC to SC (Mines) th 06/ Dated 19 July, 2017 The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to direct the respondents to reimburse the medical expenses incurred in the treatment (Kidney Transplantation) of his dependent son namely...
Sitaram Mahto and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2017
1 Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 1377 of 2003 Against the Judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 20.08.2003 and 28.08.2003, respectively passed by Sri Goutam Mahapatra, the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge, FTC-IV, Bokaro in Sessions Trial No. 110 of 1995.1. Sitaram Mahto 2. Kanku Mahto 3. Bhism Mahto 4. Sarwani Mahto All sons of late Lakhiram Mahto, resident of village Bhagabandh, P.O.- Alkusa, P.S. Chas (M) and District- Bokaro, Jharkhand. .............APPELLANTS -Versus- State of Jharkhand .RESPONDENT For the Appellants : Mr. Yogesh Modi, Advocate. For the State : Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P. For the informant : M/s Sanjay Thakur and Subhash Chandra Prakash, Advocates. PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN C.A.V. On:29. 06.2017 Pronounced on:18. 07/2017 Ananda Sen, J: This criminal appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 20.8.2003 and 28.8.2003 respectively, passed by the learned Additional D...
Amitabh Pankaj Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (PIL) No. 5614 of 2015 --- Amitabh Pankaj --- ---- Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Gumla 3. Sub Divisional Officer, Gumla 4. Circle Officer, Gumla 5. Jyoti Sangh, a registered Society through its Secretary--- --- Respondents --- CORAM:The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh The Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.B. Mangalmurti For the Petitioner: Mr. Rohitashya Roy, Advocate For the Resp - State: Mr. H.K. Mehta, A.A.G. For the Resp No. 5: Ms. Sunita Kumari, Advocate --- 09/ 18.07.2017 Heard counsel for the parties.2. Petitioner, an Advocate practicing in the Judgeship of Gumla, has preferred this Public Interest Litigation for removal of encroachment caused by the Respondent No. 5 on a public road / land as it causes inconvenience to the general public of the locality. He has also averred that though, he resides in the locality but he has no personal interest, direct or indirect, in the subject matter of Public Int...
Amitabh Choudhary Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 699 of 2017 --------- Amitabh Choudhary, S/o Late S.N. Roy Choudhary, R/o C-139, Ashok Nagar, P.O. & P.S.- Argora, Ranchi, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand) ... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Vinit Kumar Madhukar, S/o Mahendra Prasad Singh, R/o Station Road, Near Ashram School, Latehar, P.O. & P.S.- Latehar, District- Latehar (Jharkhand) ... Opposite Parties --------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Das, Advocate For the O.P. No.2. : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate --------- 04/18.07.2017 Heard Mr. A.K. Das, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mahesh Tewari, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. In this application the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the entire criminal proceedings in connection with Complaint Case No. 367 of 2014 including the order dated 02.03.2017 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar whereby and whereunder cogn...
Shyam Deo Prasad Singh Vs. Education
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S). No. 7161 of 2016 ============================================================= Shyam Deo Prasad Singh, son of late Alakh Deo Singh, resident of Mohalla Harischandra Stadium, near Arvind Press, Mamta Hospital, Nawada, P.O., P.S. & District Nawada (Bihar). Petitioner VERSUS1 The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary/ Principal Secretary, School Education & Literacy Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, having office at MDI Building, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, Town & District Ranchi.2. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Education Establishment Committee, Koderma, having office at P.O., P.S. & District Koderma.3. The District Superintendent of Education, Koderma, having office at P.O., P.S. & District Koderma. ... Respondents. ============================================================= For Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Tandon, Advocate Ms. Kumari Rashmi, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Suraj Prakash, Advocate =========================================...
Vijay Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
Criminal Revision No. 183 of 2002 Against the judgment dated 07.02.2002 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 140 of 1995 by learned 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Palamau at Daltonganj, and the Judgment of Conviction and the order of sentence dated 22.11.1995 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Palamau at Daltonganj in G.R. No. 509 of 1995 (T.R. No. 942 of 1995) Vijay Kumar Singh Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party ---- PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY For the Petitioner : Mr. Hemant Kumar Shikarwar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Awnish Shankar, APP ---- C.A.V. On 02.05.2017 Delivered On 17. 07.2017 Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.:1. Heard Mr. Hemant Kumar Shikarwar, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner and lMr. Awnish Shankar, learned A.P.P. for the State.2. This application is directed against the judgment dated 07.02.2002 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 140 of 1995 by learned 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Palamau at Daltonganj, whereby and w...
Ram Lakhan Mahto and Anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
Criminal Revision No. 340 of 2002 Against the judgment dated 09.05.2002 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 112 of 2001 by learned 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Hazaribag, and the Judgment of Conviction and the order of sentence dated 27.07.2001 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribag in G.R. No. 1015 of 1997 (T.R. No. 191 of 2001) 1. Ram Lakhan Mahto 2. Inder Mahto Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party ---- PRESENT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY For the Petitioners : Mr. Jyoti Prasad Sinha, Advocate For the State : Mr. P. K. Appu, APP ---- C.A.V. On 12.04.2017 Delivered On 17. 07.2017 Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.:1. Heard Mr. Jyoti Prasad Sinha, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner and learned Mr. P. K. Appu, learned A.P.P. for the State.2. This application is directed against the judgment dated 09.05.2002 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 112 of 2001 by learned 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Hazaribag, whereby and whereunder, the Judgment o...
Ram Narayan Ram Vs. The State of Jharkhand Through Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3180 of 2015 Ram Narayan Ram .. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through CBI .. Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishnu Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the CBI : Mr. K.P. Deo, S.C. --------- Reserved on:12. 07/2017 Pronounced on:17. 07/2017 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with R.C. 16(A) / 2012-D, registered under Sections 120B, 201, 109, 423, 424, 467, 468, 469, 471, 477-A, 419, 420, 409, 506 of the I.P.C. and Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 25A of Santhal Pargana Regulation II and Section 53 of the Santhal Pargana Tenancy Act, pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-1-cum-Spl. Judge, CBI, Dhanbad. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the CBI. The case of prosecution in short is that Superintendent of Police, CBI, ACB, Dhanbad lodged this case on the ba...
Lala Yadav Vs. The State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-17-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1828 of 2017 Govind Musuf .. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. --------- 07/Dated:17. 07/2017 Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 07 of 2017, corresponding to G.R. No. 07 of 217, registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 353 of the I.P.C. When the case is called out, attention was drawn to the last order by which learned counsel for the petitioner was directed to take instruction as to whether petitioner is ready to pay Rs. 1,00,000/- to the informant as interim compensation in view of the fact that para-37 of the case diary reveals that the informant has received injury. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is ready to pay the aforesaid amount. Be that as it may, I am inclined to admit the petiti...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »