Jharkhand Court July 2017 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Deo Kumar Alias Pappu Mahto Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-21-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI CRIMINAL APPEAL (D.B.) No. 841 of 2017 WITH I.A. No. 5046 OF2017-------- Deo Kumar @ Pappu Mahto Appellant -versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Avadh Kishore Mahto @ Jai Ram Mahto Respondents ------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ---- For the Appellant : Mr. Vishal Kumar Tiwary, Advocate Mr. Pravin Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent-State : Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, A.P.P. ------ 4 / 21.07.2017 Heard learned counsel for the informant appellant and learned counsel appearing for the State.2. This acquittal appeal is directed against the Judgment dated 6th March, 2017, passed by the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-XI, Ranchi, in Session Trial No.427 of 2014, whereby the respondent No.2, who was facing the trial for the offence under Sections 302, 307 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, has been acquitted after trial.3. The impugned Judgment shows that according to the F...
Vijay Rajak Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-21-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 72 of 2017 with I.A. No. 5864 of 2017 Vijay Rajak ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. . .... Opposite Parties. -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : M/s R.P. Srivastav & Lalit Kr. Singh, Advocates For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Jai Prakash, A.A.G. -------- 06/ 21.07.2017 Pursuant to the order dated 5.7.2017, the O.P. No. 2, Director, Handloom, Sericulture and Handicrafts, Industries Department, Jharkhand, Ranchi, is present in the Court in person to justify the order passed by him, rejecting the claim of the petitioner. To recapitulate the matter, the petitioner had filed W.P.(S) No. 6230 of 2014, claiming regularization of his service, which was never considered, even though, the petitioner was taken in service on 29.6.1980 and he superannuated on 31.12.2014. By order dated 1.8.2016, the said writ application was disposed of in the following terms:- "8. Accordingly...
Pawan Paswan Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-21-2017
-1- Criminal (Jail) Appeal (DB) No. 144 of 2010 Against the Judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 22.03.2005 & 23.03.2005 respectively, passed by Sri Anant Kumar Singh, Additional Sessions JudgeI, Sahebganj in Sessions Case No. 101 of 2004. Pawan Paswan Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent For the Appellant : Mr. P.K.Deomani, Amicus Curiae For the State : A.P.P. P R E S E N T The Honble Mr. Justice H.C.Mishra The Honble Mr. Justice Ananda Sen J U D G M E N T C.A.V. On 11/07/2017 Delivered on. 21 /07/2017 Ananda Sen, J.After being convicted for committing an offence under Sections 304-B/34 and 316/34 of the Indian Penal Code, the appellant has preferred this appeal through the jail authority.2. The Additional Sessions Judge-I, Sahebganj vide judgment dated 22.03.2005 in Sessions Case No. 101 of 2004, convicted this appellant for committing offence under Sections 304-B/34 and 316/34 of the Indian Penal Code and vide order dated 23.03.2005, s...
Janardan Prasad Roy and Ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-21-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 4153 of 2006 ..1. Janardan Prasad Roy 2. Gauri Shankar Roy 3. Ramrudra Singh 4. Dhirendra Kumar Mandal 5. Mahendra Prasad Modi 6. Namodar Roy 7. Anand Mohan Jha 8. Jai Narain Yadav 9. Mohan Lal Thakur 10. Ashok Kumar Choudhary 11. Kamleshwar Prasad Roy 12. Gauri Shankar Bhaiya 13. Sanath Kumar Mandal 14. Kamakhya Narain Singh 15. Pramod Kumar Tiwari 16. Binoda Nand Thakur 17. Shyam Sunder Das 18. Bhagwan Das Sah 19. Parsuram Yadav 20. Krishna Prasad Mahto 21 Babudhan Hansda 22. Phalanand Yadav 23. Awadesh Prasad Singh ... Petitioners -V e r s u s- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Chief Secretary, State of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, State of Jharkhand, Ranchi 4. The Secretary, Department of Co-operation, State of Jharkhand, Ranchi 5. Registrar, Co-operative Societies, State of Jharkhand, Ranchi ...Respondents CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH . For the Petit...
Bharat Kumar Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-21-2017
1 W.P.(S) No. 4977 OF2016IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 4977 OF2016Bharat Kumar, son of Late Ramji Singh Petitioner VERSUS1 The State of Jharkhand, 2. The Director General-cum-Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand, Ranchi.3. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Singhbhum (Kolhan) Range, Chaibasa.4. The Superintendent of Police, Saraikella-Kharsawan, Officiating from Saraikella Kharsawan. ... Respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. S. N. PATHAK For Petitioner : Mrs. M.M. Pal, Sr. Advocate. Mrs. Ruby Pandey, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Ajit Kumar, AAG C.A.V. On 12/07/2017 Pronounced on 21/07/2017 Dr. S.N.Pathak, J.Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for quashing the order contained in Memo No. 89/D, Dated 07.04.2014 (Annexure- 13), passed by the Director General-cum-Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand, Ranchi whereby the claim of the petitioner for counting his services working as Bal Police ...
Munna Saw Vs. Bharat Coking Coal Limited and O
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-21-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 188 of 2011 ----- Munna Saw Son of Late Chhedi @ Chhedi lal Saw, Ex-General Mazdoor/Peon, Jealgora Colliery of M/s BCCL Po & PS- Jealgora, District-Dhanbad, resident of Jealgora New Colony no.16, PO-Jealgora, PS-Jorapokhar, Dist.-Dhanbad.... Petitioner -Versus- 1.Bharat Coking Coal Limited, (A subsidiary of the Coal India Ltd.)having its Registered office at Dhanbad through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Koyala Bhawan, PO-Koyala Nagar, Dist.-Dhanbad(Jharkhand) 2. Dy. Chief Personnel Manager, Lodna Area, Bharat Coking Coal Limited, PO & PS-Lodna, Dist.-Dhanbad 3. Dy. Personnel Manager(MPR) BCCL, Koyala Bhawan, PO & PS-Koyala Nagar, Dist.-Dhanbad(Jharkhand) 4. Manager, Jealgora Colliery, PO & PS-Jealgora, Dist.-Dhanbad 5. Project Officer, Jealgora Colliery, PO & PS-Jealgora, Dist.-Dhanbad 6. Coal Mines Provident Fund, Regional Commissioner, Dhanbad .... Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR ----- For t...
Haldhar Prasad Lalla Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-21-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Acquittal Appeal (DB) No. 12 of 2017 with I.A. No. 3583 of 2017 Haldhar Prasad Lalla .... Appellant Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Mahendra Yadav .. Respondents -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA SEN ------ For the Appellant : Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate Mr. Praveen Shankar Dayal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Krishna Shankar, A.P.P. -------- 4/21.07.2017 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State.2. The appellant, who is the father of the dAcquittal Appeal (DB) No. 12 of 2017eceased, is aggrieved by the Judgment of acquittal dated 07.03.2017, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Dhanbad, in Sessions Trial No. 184 of 2009, whereby the accused respondent No. 2, who was facing trial for the offences under Sections 302 / 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, has been acquitted of charge after trial.3. According to the prosecution story as revealed from the impugned Judgment,...
Lallan Prasad P No 40195 Vs. Iisco Steel Plant and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-21-2017
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S). No. 1239 of 2010 ============================================================= Lallan Prasad (P. No. 40195), son of Atwari Bhagar, presently working as Office Assistant, Personnel Department, IISCO Steel Plant, SAIL, Chasnala, resident of Chasnalla Colliery Area, P.O. & P.S., Chasnalla, District Dhanbad. Petitioner VERSUS1 IISCO Steel Plant, C/o. Steel Authority of India Ltd., at Chasnalla Colliery Complex, P.O. & P.S. Chasnalla District Dhanbad.2. The General Manager, IISCO Steel Plant, C/o. Steel Authority of India Ltd., at Chasnalla Colliery, P.O. & P.S. Chasnalla, District Dhanbad.3. The Senior Manager (PL), IISCO Steel Plant, C/o. Steel Authority of India Ltd. at Chasnalla Colliery Complex, P.O. & P.S. Chasnalla, District Dhanbad. ... Respondents. ============================================================= For Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Mr. Vijay Kant Dubey, Advocate =...
Shiv Prasad Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and Ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-21-2017
W.P.(S) No. 4320 of 2011 --- Shiv Prasad Singh --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Secretary of Govt. of Jharkhand, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries (Dairy), Ranchi.3. Assistant Director, Dairy, Dairy Directorate, Jharkhand, Ranchi.4. Accountant General, Jharkhand, Ranchi. ---- --- Respondents --- PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Nath, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bhawesh Kumar, S.C.II Mr. Ramanand Pandey, J.C. to S.C.II ----- By Court: Heard counsel for the parties. The writ petition relates to a challenge to the reduction of pension of the petitioner to the extent of 50% forever by the impugned order dated 26th November 2010 contained in notification no.1065 issued by the Animal Husbandry and Fisheries Department (Dairy Development), Government of Jharkhand (Annexure-1). The impugned order contains the decision of the State Government on the departmental proceedings initiated against the petitioner during...
Suresh Kumar Sharma Vs. The State of Jharkhand and Anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-21-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 3696 of 2016 Krishan Lal Sharma @ Krishan Lal ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. .... Opposite party With A.B.A.No. 2832 of 2016 Suresh Kumar Sharma ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. .... Opposite party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT BIJAY SINGH --------- For the Petitioner :Mr. Jitendra S. Singh, Arun Kr. Pandey For the Opposite party : APP For the O.P.No.2 : Mr. S.P.Roy, adv, Mr. Ranjit Kumar , Adv. --------- C.A.V. on 17.07.2017 Pronounced on 21 / 07/2017 Both the applications are heard together as both the applications arises out of same complaint case no.1536 of 2015. The present case has been lodged on the basis of given written report by one Mrs. Rashi Mediratta @ Rashi Sharma alleging therein that her marriage was solemnized with Suresh Kumar Sharma on 27.11.2000 at Jamshedpur and on demand of accused No.2 and 3 Rs.5,00,000/- was given to them along with household article and t...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »