Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ajay Kumar Gupta Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.3882of2005 AjayKumarGupta ..... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. . Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR ForthePetitioner :Mr.K.P.Deo,Advocate FortheRespondents :Mrs.SwetaSingh,J.C.toG.P.I I.A.No.5919of2013 8/23.08.2013 Thepresentinterlocutoryapplicationhasbeenfiledbythe petitionerseekingamendmentintheprayerclauseofthewritpetition whichreadsasunder: and in alternative, direction may be given to respondentauthoritiestopaythepetitionerthepost retiralbenefitsasthepetitionerhasjoinedservice onthepostofAssistantTeacheron03.10.1983in pursuant to the advertisement issued by the Competent authority i.e., the then District SuperintendentofEducation,Sahibganjonvacant sanctioned post and worked continuously since 30.06.2005andwasalsogivenpromotionbythe respondent authorities vide memo no. 456269, Sahibganj, dated 01.07.1994 and thereafter, petitionerwasremovedfromservicevidememono. 753, Pakur, dated 30.06.2005, issued by Distr...
Bishal Kumar Alias Bishal Manjhi Alias Bishal Kumar Paswan Vs. the Sta ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No.721 of 2013 Bishal Kumar @ Bishal Manjhi @ Bishal Kumar Paswan ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy For the State : A. P.P. ----- 4/23.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.2. Petitioner is aggrieved by the Judgment dated 21 st March, 2013 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Latehar, in Cr. Appeal No.6 of 2012. It appears that the said criminal appeal was filed against the order dated 3.3.2013 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Ranchi, in G.R. Case No.517 of 2011, by which the bail application of the juvenile petitioner was rejected. However, the learned Sessions Judge doubted the very order dated 19.11.2011 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar, in G.R. Case No.517 of 2011, declaring the petitioner to be a juvenile, and for the reasons detailed in the o...
Dharmenra Kumar Singh Vs. Bccl
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 6994 of 2012 with W.P.(S). No. 350 of 2013 Dharmendra Kumar Singh .... Petitioner( in both cases) Versus M/s Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. & others ..... Respondents(in both cases) ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sinha For the Respondents : Mr. Ananda Sen 02/23.08.2013 Heard counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner after seeking instruction from his client submitted that petitioner has already submitted his joining on the subsequent transferred place of posting at Bararee Colliery from Lodna Colliery under the notification dated 10.10.2012. The aforesaid notification of his transfer to Bararee Colliery is under challenge in W.P.S. No. 350 of 2013. Petitioner had earlier preferred writ petition being W.P.S. No. 6994 of 2012 challenging the earlier order of transfer dated 30.10.2012 from Joyrampur colliery to Lodna Colliery. Since, the petitioner has already s...
Bharat Yadav and Other Vs. Fuleshwar Yadav
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3629 o1. Bharat Yadav 2. Bishambhar Yadav 3. Mahendar Yadav ... ... ... Petitioners Versus Fuleshwar Yadav ... ... ... Respondent CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Uday Kant Thakur For the Respondent :5. 23.08.2013 This application has been filed for quashing of order dated 22-05-2012 passed by Sub Judge 1st Godda, in Title Suit No. 11 of 2006, whereby and whereunder, he rejected the application of petitioner for adducing evidence. It appears that after framing of issue, case of plaintiff was closed on 25.06.2008. Thereafter on the application of plaintiff, case was reopened on 10.07.2009, but in spite of that, plaintiff did not adduce evidence till 07.01.2011. It also appears that after close of plaintiff's case, defendant had adduced evidence and the case of defendant closed. Now the case is running under the heading for argument. Thus, in spite of several opportunity given to the plain...
Mamta Bajpayee Vs. Phool Kumari Devi and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 186 of 2013 Mamta Bajpayee ..Petitioner Versus Phool Kumari Devi & Others .Opposite Parties ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Miss. Warda Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : Mrs. Gauri Devi, Advocate ---- 04/23-08-2013 It has been submitted that in spite of the clear direction of this Court dated 3.4.2013, passed in C.M.P. No. 135 of 2013, S.A. No. 02 of 2012 has not been disposed of. On perusal of the order, I find that there was a clear direction of this Court to dispose of S.A. No. 02 of 2012 up to 13th May, 2013 but it has been informed that said direction has not been complied with and S.A. No. 02 of 2012 has not been disposed of till date. Call for a report from the Presiding Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Ranchi (Opposite party no.4) regarding the present status of the said S.A., so that appropriate order for the alleged non- compliance of the order be passed. Put up this case on 1...
Samarjit Kumar Vs. Police
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 4442 of 2013 Samarjit Kumar .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mrs. Vandana Bharti For the Respondents : J.C. to G.P.VI 02/23.08.2013 Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioner has approached this Court for directing the respondents to appoint him on the rank of Police Constable in response to advertisement no. 1 of 2004 under which he claims to have applied for the District Koderma. Petitioner has also sought quashing of letter no. 3.5.2013 by which he has been informed by the Office of Superintendent of Police(Confidential Cell), Koderma that he had obtained only 17 marks while those in the Home Guard category who have been appointed have obtained 19 marks. It has also been informed that the process of appointment under the advertisement no. 1 of 2004 has now been stopped under the direction of the Head Quarters, as t...
Chunchun Kapri Alias Munchun Kapri and ors Vs. Collectariate
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.C. No. 3684 of 2013 Chunchun Kapri alias Munchun Kapri & Ors...Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioners : Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, Sr. Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to S.C. (L & C) ---- 05/23-08-2013 Learned J.C. to S.C. (L&C) prays for further three weeks' time to file counter affidavit. Prayer is allowed. Put up this case after three weeks. Until further order, interim order dated 19.07.2013 shall continue. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Bashista Narayan Choudhary Vs. Agriculture and Sugar Cane Development
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI WP(S)Nos.4118,4128&4305of2013 KarmaNathJha ... PetitionerinWP(S)4118/2013 DashrathPrasad ... PetitionerinWP(S)4128/2013 BashistaNarayanChoudhary PetitionerinWP(S)4305/2013 Versus TheStateofJharkhandandors. ... Respondentsinallcases. CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioners :Mr.RishiPallawa FortheRespondents :M/s. Jai Prakash, Sr. Advocate, Chaitail Sinha, J.C. to A.A.G & Anshuman Kumar,J.C.toSr.S.C.I. 523.8.2013 Heardcounselfortheparties. Thepetitioners,inthesethreewritpetitions,areaggrievedby theofficeorderdated28.6.2013ascontainedinmemono.781issued by the Director, Department of Soil Conservation, Government of Jharkhand,Ranchi,whereundertheirserviceshavebeenhandedover totheDirectorateofAgriculture. TheparentcadreofthesepetitionersisadmittedlyDirectorate ofAgricultureandnotDirectorateoftheSoilConservation,whichis notindispute.TheservicesofthepetitionersinW.P.(S)No.4118of 2013 were handed over by the Directorate of Agriculture to the...
Smt Shiv Kumari Roy Vs. Transport
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 2894 of 2013 Smt. Shiv Kumari Roy .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Prabhat Kumar Sinha For the Respondents : J.C. to Sr. S.C. II 03/23.08.2013 Heard counsel for the parties. Petitioner is widow of Late Raj Kishore Rai, who is said to have died on 29.5.2012 after his retirement from the post of In-charge Head Clerk in the District Transport Office, Jamshedpur on 28.2.2001. It is the grievance of the petitioner that most of the post retirement dues of the deceased employee have not been paid as also certain arrears of salary for the period from July 1998 to March 1999 and December, 1999 which have also not been paid. He was also entitled to the monetary benefits arising out of pay revisions, which has not been disbursed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon Annexure-4, communication dated 29.1.2013 is...
B.C.C.L. Vs. State of Bihar and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India C.W.J.C. No. 95 of 1998 (R) Ms. Bharat Coking Coal Limited through its Chief General Manager, Kustore Area, Dhanbad .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Bihar ( now Jharkhand) and others.......Respondents For the Petitioners: Mr. A.K. Mehta For the Respondents: Mr. Srijit Choudhary,G.A. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR Prashant Kumar,J:- This writ application has been filed for quashing the order dated 08.09.1997 passed by Collector, Dhanbad in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2 of 1995 whereby and whereunder, he disposed of the appeal filed by respondent no. 4 and observed that both the parties should get their title declared through a competent civil court. From perusal of impugned order, it appears that a Title Suit bearing Title Suit No. 56 of 1990 is pending before a competent civil court with regard to the same land and between the same parties. Under the said circumstance, I find no illegality in th...
- ‹ Prev
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- Next ›
- Last »