Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mamta Bajpayee Vs. Phool Kumari Devi and anr

Mamta Bajpayee vs Phool Kumari Devi and anr

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Aug 23, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1024926

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mamta Bajpayee

Respondent

Phool Kumari Devi and anr

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi c.m.p. no. 186 of 2013 mamta bajpayee ..petitioner versus phool kumari devi & others .opposite parties ----- coram:honble mr. justice narendra nath tiwari for the petitioner : miss. warda khan, advocate for the opposite parties : mrs. gauri devi, advocate ---- 04/23-08-2013 it has been submitted that in spite of the clear direction of this court dated 3.4.2013, passed in c.m.p. no. 135 of 2013, s.a. no. 02 of 2012 has not been disposed of. on perusal of the order, i find that there was a clear direction of this court to dispose of s.a. no. 02 of 2012 up to 13th may, 2013 but it has been informed that said direction has not been complied with and s.a. no. 02 of 2012 has not been disposed of till date. call for a report from the presiding officer, debt recovery tribunal, ranchi (opposite party no.4) regarding the present status of the said s.a., so that appropriate order for the alleged non- compliance of the order be passed. put up this case on 13th september, 2013. ( narendra nath tiwari, j) rakesh/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 186 of 2013 Mamta Bajpayee ..Petitioner Versus Phool Kumari Devi & Others .Opposite Parties ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Miss. Warda Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : Mrs. Gauri Devi, Advocate ---- 04/23-08-2013 It has been submitted that in spite of the clear direction of this Court dated 3.4.2013, passed in C.M.P. No. 135 of 2013, S.A. No. 02 of 2012 has not been disposed of. On perusal of the order, I find that there was a clear direction of this Court to dispose of S.A. No. 02 of 2012 up to 13th May, 2013 but it has been informed that said direction has not been complied with and S.A. No. 02 of 2012 has not been disposed of till date. Call for a report from the Presiding Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Ranchi (Opposite party no.

4) regarding the present status of the said S.A., so that appropriate order for the alleged non- compliance of the order be passed. Put up this case on 13th September, 2013. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial