Bharat Yadav and Other Vs. Fuleshwar Yadav

Bharat Yadav and Other vs Fuleshwar Yadav

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Aug 23, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1024918

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1024918
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Aug 23, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Bharat Yadav and Other

Respondent

Fuleshwar Yadav

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand ranchi w.p.(c) no. 3629 o”1. bharat yadav 2. bishambhar yadav 3. mahendar yadav ... ... ... petitioners versus fuleshwar yadav ... ... ... respondent coram: the honble mr. justice prashant kumar ............ for the petitioner : mr. uday kant thakur for the respondent :5. 23.08.2013 this application has been filed for quashing of order dated 22-05-2012 passed by sub judge 1st godda, in title suit no. 11 of 2006, whereby and whereunder, he rejected the application of petitioner for adducing evidence. it appears that after framing of issue, case of plaintiff was closed on 25.06.2008. thereafter on the application of plaintiff, case was reopened on 10.07.2009, but in spite of that, plaintiff did not adduce evidence till 07.01.2011. it also appears that after close of plaintiff's case, defendant had adduced evidence and the case of defendant closed. now the case is running under the heading for argument. thus, in spite of several opportunity given to the plaintiff/ petitioner, he had not adduced evidence. under the said circumstance, i find that the learned court below rightly rejected his application. accordingly, i find no merit in this application. hence, same is dismissed. (prashant kumar, j.) binit

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3629 o”

1. Bharat Yadav 2. Bishambhar Yadav 3. Mahendar Yadav ... ... ... Petitioners Versus Fuleshwar Yadav ... ... ... Respondent CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Uday Kant Thakur For the Respondent :

5. 23.08.2013 This application has been filed for quashing of order dated 22-05-2012 passed by Sub Judge 1st Godda, in Title Suit No. 11 of 2006, whereby and whereunder, he rejected the application of petitioner for adducing evidence. It appears that after framing of issue, case of plaintiff was closed on 25.06.2008. Thereafter on the application of plaintiff, case was reopened on 10.07.2009, but in spite of that, plaintiff did not adduce evidence till 07.01.2011. It also appears that after close of plaintiff's case, defendant had adduced evidence and the case of defendant closed. Now the case is running under the heading for argument. Thus, in spite of several opportunity given to the plaintiff/ petitioner, he had not adduced evidence. Under the said circumstance, I find that the learned court below rightly rejected his application. Accordingly, I find no merit in this application. Hence, same is dismissed. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Bharat Yadav and Other vs Fuleshwar Yadav Same Subject Education