Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sambhu Prasad Singh Vs. Information Commission
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 7466 of 2012 Sambhu Prasad Singh .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & ors ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. P.K. Choudhary For the Respondents: Mr. Ajit Kumar Re: I.A. No. 6269 o4. 23.08.2013: This Interlocutory Application has been filed for amendment of the cause title of the main writ application. It is submitted that the name of respondent no. 3 has been wrongly typed as Sachhidanand, though the name of respondent no. 3 is Janardhan Prasad Sah. Considering the facts and circumstances mentioned in the Interlocutory Application, the same is allowed and petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the name of respondent no.3. in the cause title of the writ application. Petitioner is directed to take steps for service of notice on the correct name of respondent no. 3, through registered post with A/ D as well as by ordinary process for which requisites etc mus...
Electrosteel Steels Limited Through Its Senior Manager Sri Shrish Kuma ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4923 of 2013 Electrosteel Steels Limited .........Petitioner Vs. M/s. Central Coal Fields Limited and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Indrajit Sinha For the Respondents: Mr. Mokhtar Khan Re: I.A. No. 6138 o3. 23.08.2013: This interlocutory application has been filed for amending the main writ application as indicated in paragraph no. 6 of the Interlocutory Application. It appears that main writ application has been filed challenging the notice for cancellation of LOA. During the pendency of this writ application, the said LOA has already been terminated. Petitioner wants to impugned the order by which LOA terminated. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow I.A. No. 6138 of 2013. Paragraph no. 6 of the I.A. and Annexure-18 annexed in the I.A. will become the part of the main writ application. So far stay of Annexure-18 is concerned, the same will be conside...
M/S Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
In the matter of an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India C.W.J.C. No. 3679 of 1997 (R) Ms. Bharat Coking Coal Limited through its Chief General Manager, Kustore Area, Dhanbad .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Bihar ( now Jharkhand) and others.......Respondents For the Petitioners: Mr. A.K. Mehta For the Respondents: Mr. Srijit Choudhary,G.A. PRESENT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR Prashant Kumar,J:- This writ application has been filed for quashing the order dated 08.09.1997 passed by Collector, Dhanbad in BPLE Appeal No. 21 of 1990 whereby and whereunder, he disposed of the appeal filed by respondent no. 4 and observed that both the parties should get their title declared through a competent civil court. From perusal of impugned order, it appears that a Title Suit bearing Title Suit No. 56 of 1990 is pending before a competent civil court with regard to the same land and between the same parties. Under the said circumstance, I find no illegality in the impu...
Baidyanath Ram Vs. Sri Kanwar Deep Singh and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Election Petition No. 12 of 2010 Baidyanath Ram ..Petitioner Versus Sri Kanwar Deep Singh & Others .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. H.K. Lall, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. A.K. Lall, Advocate ----- I.A. No. 6399/2013 38/23.08.2013 In this I.A., the petitioner has prayed for three weeks' time on the ground that the entire file of the case has been misplaced and he is not in a position to proceed with the case. Learned counsel for respondent no. 1 has no objection. Considering the above, this I.A. is allowed. As jointly prayed for, put up this case on 20th September, 2013. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Baburai Kisku Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI M.A . No. 21 of 2009 Baburai Kisku .... Appellant Versus Union of India and others ... Respondents Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the appellant (s): Mr V.K.Tiwary For the respondents : xxxx 23.08.2013 IA No. 1753 of 2012 was filed to condone the delay in filing the appeal. On 7.12.2012, the appellant was directed to file requisites for service of notice for which one week's peremptory time was allowed. Since order dated 7.12.2012 has not been complied with, the limitation petition ( IA No. 1753 of 2012) filed under section 5 of the Limitation Act stood dismissed due to non compliance of the order. Consequently, this appeal also stands dismissed. Ambastha/- ( D.N.Upadhyay,J.)...
Puneet Chadha Vs. Collectariate
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P .(C)No.4788of2013 PuneetChadha Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&others Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI ForthePetitioner:Mr.IndrajitSinha,Adv. FortheRespondents:J.C.toA.A.G. 03/23.08.2013 Issuenoticetorespondentno.5underregisteredcoverwithA/Dfor whichrequisitesetc.mustbefiledwithinoneweekinCourt,failingwhich thiswritpetitionasagainstrespondentno.5shallstandrejectedwithout furtherreferencetoaBench. Learned J.C.toA.A.G.,appearingfortheState,seeksfourweeks' timetofileacounteraffidavit. Prayerisallowed. Tillthen,operationoftheimpugnedorderdated17.07.2013passed inS.A.R.RevisionCaseNo.13of2010shallremainstayed. (NarendraNathTiwari,J.) sudhir...
Snigdha Vs. Birla Institute of Technology Through Its Vice Chancellor ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI ContemptCase(Civil)No.596of2013 Snigdha .... Petitioner Versus BirlaInstituteofTechnologyandors.....RespondentsOppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.SumeetGadodia FortheRespondents/Opp.Parties :M/s.JaiPrakash,AAG& RishiPallava 423.8.2013 After hearing learned counselfor the parties, itappears that interimorderdated1.7.2013hasbeensubstantiallycompliedwithas thepetitionerhasbeenprovisionallyadmittedinthethirdsemester courseandhadalsobeenallowedtoappearinthequizexamination held periodically during the course. However, the petitioner has an apprehension that since the respondentsopposite parties have not accepted the examination fee, she may be again prevented from appearingintheendsemesterexaminationscheduledtobeheldin October,2013. However,itappearsthattherespondentshaveearlierbyvirtue ofaninterimorderpassedinfavourofthepetitioner,notonlyallowed hertobeadmittedinthesecondsemestercoursebutalsoadmitted her to sit in ...
Habil Cherwa Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8045 of 2013 Habil Cherwa ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Pravin Kumar For the State : A. P.P. ----- 2/23.8.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 25(1-B)(a)/26 of Arms Act, in connection with Manoharpur P.S. Case No.35 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.226 of 2012. From the FIR, it appears that the petitioner was apprehended on 4.8.2012 and from his possession, one country made loaded pistol and two extra cartridges were recovered. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Habil Cherwa is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri M. K. Sharma, lea...
Smt Ranjana Gupta Vs. Sri Ashok Kumar Poddar and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 7307 of 2012 Smt. Ranjana Gupta ... ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. Sri Ashok Kumar Poddar 2. Sri Pawan Kumar Poddar 3. M.s Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Ranchi ...... ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Delip Jerath For the Respondents(1,2) : Mr. Atanu Banerjee For the respondent No. 3 Mr. Mrinal Kanti Roy 12/23.08.2013 This application has been filed for quashing the Execution Case No. 07 of 1995, pending in the court of learned Sub Judge-II, Lohardaga. It appears that respondent No. 1 & 2 had filed eviction suit vide Eviction Suit No. 02 of 1985 against respondent No.3. Said eviction suit has been decreed. Thereafter aforesaid decree affirmed up to this Court and become final. Thereafter respondent Nos. 1 & 2 had filed application for execution of the said decree before Sub Judge-II, Lohardaga, which was registered as Execution Case No. 07 of 1995. It further...
Dharmendra Kumar Singh Vs. Ms Bharat Coking Coal Ltd Through Its C M D ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 6994 of 2012 with W.P.(S). No. 350 of 2013 Dharmendra Kumar Singh .... Petitioner( in both cases) Versus M/s Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. & others ..... Respondents(in both cases) ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sinha For the Respondents : Mr. Ananda Sen 02/23.08.2013 Heard counsel for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner after seeking instruction from his client submitted that petitioner has already submitted his joining on the subsequent transferred place of posting at Bararee Colliery from Lodna Colliery under the notification dated 10.10.2012. The aforesaid notification of his transfer to Bararee Colliery is under challenge in W.P.S. No. 350 of 2013. Petitioner had earlier preferred writ petition being W.P.S. No. 6994 of 2012 challenging the earlier order of transfer dated 30.10.2012 from Joyrampur colliery to Lodna Colliery. Since, the petitioner has already s...
- ‹ Prev
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- Next ›
- Last »