Skip to content


Electrosteel Steels Limited Through Its Senior Manager Sri Shrish Kumar Vs. the Ms Central Coal Fields Limited and ors - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Jharkhand High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Electrosteel Steels Limited Through Its Senior Manager Sri Shrish Kumar

Respondent

The Ms Central Coal Fields Limited and ors

Excerpt:


in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(c) no. 4923 of 2013 electrosteel steels limited .........petitioner vs. m/s. central coal fields limited and others ........respondents coram: hon'ble mr. justice prashant kumar for the petitioner: mr. indrajit sinha for the respondents: mr. mokhtar khan re: i.a. no. 6138 o”3. 23.08.2013: this interlocutory application has been filed for amending the main writ application as indicated in paragraph no. 6 of the interlocutory application. it appears that main writ application has been filed challenging the notice for cancellation of loa. during the pendency of this writ application, the said loa has already been terminated. petitioner wants to impugned the order by which loa terminated. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, i allow i.a. no. 6138 of 2013. paragraph no. 6 of the i.a. and annexure-18 annexed in the i.a. will become the part of the main writ application. so far stay of annexure-18 is concerned, the same will be considered at the time of admission. put up this case on 05.09.2013 under the heading for admission. ( prashant kumar,j.) sharda/-

Judgment:


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4923 of 2013 Electrosteel Steels Limited .........Petitioner Vs. M/s. Central Coal Fields Limited and others ........Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Indrajit Sinha For the Respondents: Mr. Mokhtar Khan Re: I.A. No. 6138 o”

3. 23.08.2013: This interlocutory application has been filed for amending the main writ application as indicated in paragraph no. 6 of the Interlocutory Application. It appears that main writ application has been filed challenging the notice for cancellation of LOA. During the pendency of this writ application, the said LOA has already been terminated. Petitioner wants to impugned the order by which LOA terminated. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow I.A. No. 6138 of 2013. Paragraph no. 6 of the I.A. and Annexure-18 annexed in the I.A. will become the part of the main writ application. So far stay of Annexure-18 is concerned, the same will be considered at the time of admission. Put up this case on 05.09.2013 under the heading for Admission. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //