Jharkhand Court August 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Shamim Ansari Alias Mintu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 7949 of 2013 Shamim Ansari @ Mintu ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.R.S.Mazumdar, Sr.Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 29.08.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Nirsa (Kalubathan) P.S. Case No. 183 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 2715 of 2013 for the offence under Sections 414, 413 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner is alleged to be involved in transaction of illegal coal. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Shamim Ansari @ Mintu on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Sri Santosh Kumar No.2, learned Judicia...
Singheshwar Mahto Alias Sidheswar Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 487 of 2013 Singheshwar Mahto @ Sidheswar Mahto Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the State : - Mr. P.K. Sahay, A.P.P. 07/29.08.2013 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) sunil/...
Bhogesh Kumar Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 2206 of 2012 Bhogesh Kumar .... Petitioner Versus Union of India & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Prabhash Chandra Jha For the Respondents : J.C. to A.S.G.I. I.A. No. 4628 o08. 29.08.2013 By way of instant interlocutory application petitioner has prayed for early hearing of the case. It appears that counter affidavit has not been filed though time has been granted on 23.7.2012. Learned J.C. to learned A.S.G.I, Md. Mokhtar Khan prays for some time to take proper instruction and file counter affidavit. In that view of the matter, 3 weeks time is allowed to the counsel for the respondents to file counter affidavit in the matter. List this case after 5 weeks under the appropriate heading for admission. In view of the aforesaid order, I.A. No. 4628 of 2013 preferred for early hearing of the case also stands disposed of. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) A. Mohanty...
Prabhakar Kumar Vs. Education
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 5434 of 2012 Prabhakar Kumar .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Dr. S.N.Pathak For the Respondents : J.C. to Sr. S.C. II I.A. No. 4305 o05. 29.08.2013 By way of instant interlocutory application petitioner has now sought to challenge the order dated 20.6.2013 by which the promotion granted to him to the post of Block Education Extension Officer has been cancelled by the Director, Primary Education cum Joint Secretary, Directorate of Primary Education, Department of Human Resource and Development, Government of Jharkhand. In the main writ application, petitioner has approached this Court against the order dated 25.8.2012 which is annexed as Annexure-2 to the main writ application whereby recommendation was made by the Director, Primary Education, Ranchi for cancellation of promotion of the petitioner. In view of the sub...
Balbir Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2795 of 2013 Balbir Singh ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. P.A.S. Pati For the State: Mrs. Richa Sanchita, APP 2/29.08.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Radha Mohan Singh and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2749 o1. Radha Mohan Singh 2. Karan Singh ... ....Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. Bibhash Sinha For the State: Mr. G.S. Prasad, APP 2/29.08.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Munna Sao Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 7693 of 2013 Munna sao ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Jai Prakash Pandey For the State: Mr. S.K. Sharma, APP 4/29.08.2013: Bail application filed by petitioner Munna sao is moved by Sri Jai Prakash Pandey and opposed by Sri S.K. Sharma, learned Additional P.P. Earlier bail prayer of petitioner rejected after considering the statement of Churki Devi. However, the aforesaid Churki Devi has been examined by the trial court as P.W.2. While deposing in court, she has not supported the case of prosecution and declared hostile. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the court below to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Giridih in conn...
Ramanuj Sharma Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4790 of 2012 Ramanuj Sharma ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Indrajit Sinha For the State: Mr. Ravi Prakash, APP 10/29.08.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file regular bail application as two co-accused, namely, Kumar Vijay Singh and Rana Umesh Singh have been ranted regular bail by this Court and by the learned Sessions Judge respectively. Aforesaid prayer is allowed. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is permitted to be withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Dr Arun Kumar Vs. Science and Technology
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 4702 of 2013 with W.P.(S) No. 634 of 2012 --- Dr. Arun Kumar (WPS 4702/13) Kalicharan Rawani (WPS 634/12) --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others --- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. R. Krishna & Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocates (WPS 4702/13) For the Petitioner: Mr. Manoj Akhter, Advocate (WPS 634/12) For the State: Mr. Sumir Prasad, SC-1 & Mr. R. Mukhopadhyay, SC-II For Pvt. Respondents: Mr. K.K. Jha, Advocate --- WPS No. 4702/13 05/ 29.08.2013 The petitioner in the instant writ application has preferred this writ petition against a show-cause notice contained at Annexure-23 dated 11th July 2013 issued by the respondent department, by which he has been asked to explain as to why his services be not terminated on account of the fact that he has not been confirmed as yet.2. It is informed by the counsel for the parties that the petitioner has filed his ...
Ram Swarath Paswan Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Aug-29-2013
Criminal Appeal (S.J) No.1014 of 2012 Against the judgment of conviction dated 24.9.2012 and order of sentence dated 27.9.2012 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Pakur in S.C.No.128 of 2008. Ram Swarath Paswan............................................Appellant VERSUS State of Jharkhand .......................................... Respondent For the Appellant :Mr.Rajeev Sharma,Sr. Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P P R E S E N T THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD By Court: This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 24.9.2012 and 27.9.2012 passed by the Sessions Judge, Pakur in Sessions Case No.128 of 2008 whereby and whereunder the appellant was convicted under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years and was further sentenced to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. The case of the prosecution is that one Radhika Devi (P.W...
- ‹ Prev
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- Next ›
- Last »