Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Prabhakar Kumar Vs. Education

Prabhakar Kumar vs Education

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Aug 29, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1024969

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prabhakar Kumar

Respondent

Education

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(s). no. 5434 of 2012 prabhakar kumar .... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand & others ..... respondents ---------- coram: honble mr. justice aparesh kumar singh for the petitioner : dr. s.n.pathak for the respondents : j.c. to sr. s.c. ii i.a. no. 4305 o”05. 29.08.2013 by way of instant interlocutory application petitioner has now sought to challenge the order dated 20.6.2013 by which the promotion granted to him to the post of block education extension officer has been cancelled by the director, primary education cum joint secretary, directorate of primary education, department of human resource and development, government of jharkhand. in the main writ application, petitioner has approached this court against the order dated 25.8.2012 which is annexed as annexure-2 to the main writ application whereby recommendation was made by the director, primary education, ranchi for cancellation of promotion of the petitioner. in view of the subsequent development, having taken place during the pendency of the writ application, whereby petitioner's promotion to the post of block eduction extension officer has been cancelled , the prayer made in the instant i.a. deserves to be allowed in order to avoid multiplicity of the proceeding as also it relates to the main cause of action. accordingly, i.a. no. 4305 of 2013 stands disposed of. w.p.(s). no. 5434 of 2012 petitioner is permitted to file an amended writ application incorporating the proposed amendments in the main writ application within a period of 2 weeks. the respondents are at liberty to file response to the amended writ application as also to the averments made in the supplementary affidavit filed on 23.7.2013 within a period of 3 weeks, thereafter. let this case appear after 6 weeks under the heading for admission. (aparesh kumar singh, j.) a. mohanty

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 5434 of 2012 Prabhakar Kumar .... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Dr. S.N.Pathak For the Respondents : J.C. to Sr. S.C. II I.A. No. 4305 o”

05. 29.08.2013 By way of instant interlocutory application petitioner has now sought to challenge the order dated 20.6.2013 by which the promotion granted to him to the post of Block Education Extension Officer has been cancelled by the Director, Primary Education cum Joint Secretary, Directorate of Primary Education, Department of Human Resource and Development, Government of Jharkhand. In the main writ application, petitioner has approached this Court against the order dated 25.8.2012 which is annexed as Annexure-2 to the main writ application whereby recommendation was made by the Director, Primary Education, Ranchi for cancellation of promotion of the petitioner. In view of the subsequent development, having taken place during the pendency of the writ application, whereby petitioner's promotion to the post of Block Eduction Extension Officer has been cancelled , the prayer made in the instant I.A. deserves to be allowed in order to avoid multiplicity of the proceeding as also it relates to the main cause of action. Accordingly, I.A. No. 4305 of 2013 stands disposed of. W.P.(S). No. 5434 of 2012 Petitioner is permitted to file an amended writ application incorporating the proposed amendments in the main writ application within a period of 2 weeks. The respondents are at liberty to file response to the amended writ application as also to the averments made in the supplementary affidavit filed on 23.7.2013 within a period of 3 weeks, thereafter. Let this case appear after 6 weeks under the heading for admission. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) A. Mohanty

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial