Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ramanuj Sharma Vs. State of Jharkhand

Ramanuj Sharma vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Aug 29, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1024992

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ramanuj Sharma

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b.a. no. 4790 of 2012 ramanuj sharma ... ....petitioner vs. the state of jharkhand ....opposite party coram: hon'ble mr. justice prashant kumar for the petitioner: mr. indrajit sinha for the state: mr. ravi prakash, app 10/29.08.2013: learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file regular bail application as two co-accused, namely, kumar vijay singh and rana umesh singh have been ranted regular bail by this court and by the learned sessions judge respectively. aforesaid prayer is allowed. accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is permitted to be withdrawn. ( prashant kumar,j.) sharda/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4790 of 2012 Ramanuj Sharma ... ....Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ....Opposite Party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Indrajit Sinha For the State: Mr. Ravi Prakash, APP 10/29.08.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file regular bail application as two co-accused, namely, Kumar Vijay Singh and Rana Umesh Singh have been ranted regular bail by this Court and by the learned Sessions Judge respectively. Aforesaid prayer is allowed. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is permitted to be withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial