Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Manju Pathak and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Manju Pathak and anr. vs State of Jharkhand and anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Aug 29, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1024954

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manju Pathak and anr.

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and anr.

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr.m.p. no.601 o”1. manju pathak 2.rakesh pathak 3.dr.kamleshwar prasad shukla............................petitioners versus state of jharkhand and another ......... ..........opposite parties coram: honble mr. justice r.r.prasad for the petitioners: mr.a.k.sahani 11/ 29.8.13. learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that since the matter has been compromised, he may be permitted to withdraw this application. permission is accorded. this application be dismissed as withdrawn. (r.r.prasad, j.) nd/

Full Judgment

In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.601 o”

1. Manju Pathak 2.Rakesh Pathak 3.Dr.Kamleshwar Prasad Shukla............................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ......... ..........Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners: Mr.A.K.Sahani 11/ 29.8.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that since the matter has been compromised, he may be permitted to withdraw this application. Permission is accorded. This application be dismissed as withdrawn. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial