Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Murari Kumar Yadav Vs. Union of India and ors

Murari Kumar Yadav vs Union of India and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Aug 29, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1025006

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Murari Kumar Yadav

Respondent

Union of India and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(s). no. 5474 of 2011 murari kumar yadav .... petitioner versus union of india & others ..... respondents ---------- coram: honble mr. justice aparesh kumar singh for the petitioner : mr. hardeo prasad singh for the respondents : mr. md. mokhtar khan, a.s.g.i. i.a. no. 6136 o”04. 29.08.2013 by way of instant interlocutory application petitioner seeks to challenge the appellate order passed on 7.4.2012 during the pendency of the instant writ application whereby the order of termination of service of the petitioner has been confirmed. petitioner has approached this court against the said order of termination dated 19.4.2011. learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the fact that the appellate order has been passed during the pendency of the writ application. in such circumstances, since the proposed amendments are connected to the main cause of action and as the aforesaid development took place during the pendency of the writ application, petitioner is allowed to incorporate the proposed amendments in the main writ application. accordingly, the instant i.a. no. 6136 of 2013 is allowed. w.p.(s). no. 5474 of 2011 let an amended writ application be filed within a period of two weeks incorporating the proposed amendments being allowed today. respondents are at liberty to file response to the same within a period of 4 weeks, thereafter. list this case after 8 weeks under the appropriate heading. (aparesh kumar singh, j.) a. mohanty

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 5474 of 2011 Murari Kumar Yadav .... Petitioner Versus Union of India & others ..... Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Hardeo Prasad Singh For the Respondents : Mr. Md. Mokhtar Khan, A.S.G.I. I.A. No. 6136 o”

04. 29.08.2013 By way of instant interlocutory application petitioner seeks to challenge the Appellate order passed on 7.4.2012 during the pendency of the instant writ application whereby the order of termination of service of the petitioner has been confirmed. Petitioner has approached this Court against the said order of termination dated 19.4.2011. Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the fact that the Appellate order has been passed during the pendency of the writ application. In such circumstances, since the proposed amendments are connected to the main cause of action and as the aforesaid development took place during the pendency of the writ application, petitioner is allowed to incorporate the proposed amendments in the main writ application. Accordingly, the instant I.A. No. 6136 of 2013 is allowed. W.P.(S). No. 5474 of 2011 Let an amended writ application be filed within a period of two weeks incorporating the proposed amendments being allowed today. Respondents are at liberty to file response to the same within a period of 4 weeks, thereafter. List this case after 8 weeks under the appropriate heading. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) A. Mohanty

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial