Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Narayan Prasad Sinha Vs. Mineral Area Development Authority Andors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.784 of 2013 with I.A. No.5191 of 2013 Narayan Prasad Sinha .......... Petitioner Versus Mineral Area Development Authority & Ors. ........ Respondents ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ------ For the petitioner : Mr. Someshwar Roy, Advocate For the respondents : Mr. Bhawesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocate Mr. Rahul Kamlesh, Advocate ------ 4/31.07.2013: The petitioner has filed the writ petition for direction on the respondents to pay his arrears of salary and also for payment of retiral dues. In the interlocutory application, prayer has been made for early hearing of the writ petition on the ground that the petitioner is an old person and a senior citizen. He is ailing for quite a long time. The matter is extremely urgent. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that in view of the nature of prayer made in the writ petition, the same may be disposed of at this stage. Heard the pa...
Shambhu Sao Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case(C) No. 479 of 2013 --- Shambhu Saw ..... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & Anr. ..... Opp. Party --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrani S. Choudhary, Adv. For the Opp. Party : Mr. Sumir Prasad (S.C.I) - -- 4/31.07.2013 Since the petitioner was superannuated on 31.10.1997 he is eligible and entitle to get the benefit of Vth pay commission. Therefore, the effect of revised pay scale is required to be given w.e.f. 01.01.1996. Accordingly, the respondent-State authorities shall pass appropriate order and thereby give effect of revised pay scale to the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite partirs-State Government submitted that so far giving effect of revised pay scale from 01.01.1996 is concerned, he will discuss this matter with the officers of the Finance Department and on the next date, he will submit the further report. Put up this case on 14.8.2013. Let a copy of this order be ...
Mansu Turi Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 295 of 2013 Mansu Turi Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Respondent ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. CHANDRASHEKHAR ----- For the Appellant: Mr. P.K. Deomani For the Respondent: Mr. S.S. Prasad, A.P.P. ------ 06/Dated: July, 31, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, J1) This appeal has already been admitted by this Court by order dated 27th June, 2013. Record and proceedings of the Sessions Trial No.231 of 2004 was called for from the trial Court to appreciate the argument for suspension of sentence awarded to the appellant-accused.2) The appellant was convicted by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Gumla in Sessions Trial No.231 of 2004 for life imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and is also punished for rigorous imprisonment for five years for the offence punishable under Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code and also for fine and in case of...
Ajay Kumar Yadav and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 2113 o1. Ajay Kumar Yadav 2.Arun Kumar Yadav 3.Akhilesh Kumar Soni 4.Nera Yadav @ Nera Devi .........Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. Binod Kumar Dubey For the State: Mr. Manoj Kumar No. 3,APP 3/31.07.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to file supplementary affidavit. Put up this case in the next week. In the meantime, interim order dated 29.05.2013 will continue. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Pranav Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 2129 of 2013 Pranav Kumar Singh .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ........Opposite parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Kailash Prasad Deo For the State: Mrs. Sadhna Kumar,APP For the O.P. No. 2: Mr. P.A.S. Pati 3/31.07.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Pranav Kumar Singh is moved by Sri Kailash Prasad Deo and opposed by Mrs. Sadhna Kumar, learned Additional P.P. and Sri PAS Pati, learned counsel for the O.P. No.2. As per the agreement between petitioner and complainant, petitioner received Rs. 11,00,000/- through cheque and handed over possession of Brick Kiln to the complainant-informant. It then appears that complainant gave a post dated cheque of Rs. 10,00,000/- to the petitioner towards rest consideration money, but later on complainant instructed the petitioner for not encashing the same. Now the complainant does not want to purchase the said Brick Ki...
Sabnam Iqbal and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1696 o1. Sabnam Iqbal 2.Md. Iqbal @ Md. Masood Iqbal @ Masood Iqbal....Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ........................Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners : Mr. A.K.Kashyap, Sr. Advocate For the State :A.P.P For the O.P.No.2 : Mr. Bibhash Sinha, Advocate 4/ 31.7.13. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 and taking into account the allegation made against the petitioners that the case never happens to be quashing of the order taking cognizance. Accordingly, the order taking cognizance never warrants to be quashed. Thus, this application stands dismissed. ( R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Manju Devi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 2546 of 2013. ----- Manju Devi Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri Nilesh Kumar For the State : Sri Vikash Kishore, A.P.P. ----- 05/31.07.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Manju Devi is moved by Sri Nilesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Vikash Kishore, Addl.P.P. for the State. It is alleged that petitioner being Panchayat Sevak withdrew Rs. 13,000/- from the bank and mis-appropriated the same. However, from perusal of impugned order, I find that said money has been re- deposited in the bank on 09.03.2013. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner, named above, to surrender in the court below by 14/08/2013. If petitioner surrenders by that time, the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, named above, on bail, on furnishing...
indo Sao Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.(Jail)Appeal(DB)No.47of2003 IndoSao Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhand&another Respondents CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR FortheAppellant : None FortheState : A.P.P. 14/Dated:31 st July,2013 PerD.N.Patel,J.:1. Whenthematteriscalledout,nobodyappearsonbehalfoftheappellant.2. With a view to give one more chance to the appellant, the matter is adjournedtobelistedon7thAugust,2013.3. Thisappealisnottobetreatedaspartheard. (D.N.Patel,J.) (ShreeChandrashekhar,J.) Ajay/...
Santosh Kumar Vs. C I S F
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 7174 of 2012 Santosh Kumar .. Petitioner Versus The Union of India & Others .. Respondents ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ----- For the Petitioner - Mr. Amit Sinha, Advocate For the Respondents - Mr. Mokhtar Khan, ASGI ----- I.A. No. 332/2013 06/31.7.2013 In this I.A., the petitioner has prayed for addition of prayer and amendment in the writ petition. It has been stated that during pendency of the writ petition, the respondent-revisional authority has passed the order enhancing punishment without any cogent ground. The petitioner seeks to challenge the said order by adding a prayer and amending the writ petition to that regard. It has been submitted that the amendment prayed for is based on the same factual background and the same, if allowed, would not change the nature of the writ petition. Learned Assistant Solicitor General of India, appearing on behalf of the respondents, has no objection in allowing the ...
Babli Kumari and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-31-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2049 o1. Babli Kumari 2. Raju Kumar Singh @ Sachidanand Singh .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 31.07.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for anticipatory bail flied by the petitioners in connection with Chas PS case No. 220 of 2011 for the offence registered under sections 147/149/337/341/323/379/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals from written report that the informant got possession of the land in dispute through process of court, but on the very next day, the petitioners, who are daughter and son of the judgment debtor Jainarayan Singh, have removed house-hold articles belonging to the informant and also caused assault to him. It is submitted that land dispute between the parties is there from before and Second Appea...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »