Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2049 o”
1. Babli Kumari 2. Raju Kumar Singh @ Sachidanand Singh .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 31.07.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for anticipatory bail flied by the petitioners in connection with Chas PS case No. 220 of 2011 for the offence registered under sections 147/149/337/341/323/379/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals from written report that the informant got possession of the land in dispute through process of court, but on the very next day, the petitioners, who are daughter and son of the judgment debtor Jainarayan Singh, have removed house-hold articles belonging to the informant and also caused assault to him. It is submitted that land dispute between the parties is there from before and Second Appeal is pending before this Court. The police did not find the allegation of theft true. One of the co-accused having similar allegation has been granted anticipatory bail vide ABA No. 3740 of 2012. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Considering facts and circumstances of the case and grant of bail to similarly situated co-accused, both the petitioners above named are directed to appear/surrender before the court below within a period of three weeks positively from the date of this order and on their surrender, they shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bokaro, in connection with Chas PS case No. 220 of 2011 (GR No. 1639 of 2011), subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C. Ambastha/- ( D.N.Upadhyay,J.)