Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Manju Devi Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Manju Devi vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jul 31, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1008725

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manju Devi

Advocate Sri. Nilesh Kumar

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b.a.no. 2546 of 2013. ----- manju devi petitioner. versus the state of jharkhand opposite party. ..... coram : the hon'ble mr. justice prashant kumar. ----- for the petitioner : sri nilesh kumar for the state : sri vikash kishore, a.p.p. ----- 05/31.07.2013. anticipatory bail application filed by manju devi is moved by sri nilesh kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by sri vikash kishore, addl.p.p. for the state. it is alleged that petitioner being panchayat sevak withdrew rs. 13,000/- from the bank and mis-appropriated the same. however, from perusal of impugned order, i find that said money has been re- deposited in the bank on 09.03.2013. considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, i allow this application and direct the petitioner, named above, to surrender in the court below by 14/08/2013. if petitioner surrenders by that time, the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, named above, on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of judicial magistrate, ist class, ranchi in connection with burmu p.s. case no.10/2013, corresponding to g.r. no.1677/2013, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr. p.c. ( prashant kumar, j.) raman/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 2546 of 2013. ----- Manju Devi Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri Nilesh Kumar For the State : Sri Vikash Kishore, A.P.P. ----- 05/31.07.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Manju Devi is moved by Sri Nilesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Vikash Kishore, Addl.P.P. for the State. It is alleged that petitioner being Panchayat Sevak withdrew Rs. 13,000/- from the bank and mis-appropriated the same. However, from perusal of impugned order, I find that said money has been re- deposited in the bank on 09.03.2013. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner, named above, to surrender in the court below by 14/08/2013. If petitioner surrenders by that time, the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, named above, on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, Ist class, Ranchi in connection with Burmu P.S. case no.10/2013, corresponding to G.R. No.1677/2013, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) Raman/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial