Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Murlishyam Singh Vs. Co Operative
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 2129 of 2013 Murlishyam Singh .. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others .. Respondents ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ----- For the Petitioner - Mr. L.K.Singh For the Respondents - Mr. M.K.Roy ----- 2/18.7.2013 I. A. No. 4892/2013 In this application, the petitioner has prayed for disposal of W.P.(S) No. 2129/2013 in terms of the order dated 11.1.2013 passed in W.P.(S) No. 6977/2012 (Ram Pravesh Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand & Ors.). It has been submitted that the petitioner's case is exactly identical to the case of the petitioner of the said writ petition and this writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the said order. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has not controverted the said contentions. In view of the above, W.P.(S) No. 2129/2013 is being disposed of by separate order. This application stands disposed of. (NARENDRA NATH TIWARI, J) W.P.(S) No. 2129 of 2013 In this wri...
Mahesh Yadav Alias Lutan Yadav and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.M.P.No.1842of2013 1.MaheshYadav@LutanYadav 2.HarendraYadav .... .... . Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhand .... .... .... Opp.Party CORAM :HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioners :Mr.ArbindKumarChoudhary,Advocate FortheState :A.P.P. 02/18.07.2013 Heard Learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counselfortheState. Petitionershavefiledthisapplicationformodificationof theorderdated28.06.2013passedinB.A.No.5573of2013tothe extentofnatureofbailor. Counselforthepetitionershassubmittedthathehasno closerelativewithinthedistrictofDhanbad,allhiscloserelativesare residinginthedistrictofDeoghar. Counsel for the State opposed and submitted that the petitionersareinvolvedinnumberofcases. Consideringthesubmissionsmadebytheparties,Iallow thisapplicationandmodifytheorderdated28.06.2013totheextent that one of the bailor will be local resident having immovable propertywithinthedistrictconcernedandanotherwillbefatherof thepetitioners. With the aforesaid mod...
Arvind Kumar Sinha Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1975 o1. Arvind Kumar Sinha 2. Deo Prakash Thakur 3. Narayan Prasad 4. Manoj Kumar Sah @ Manoj Kumar Shaw 5. Sanjay Kumar Mahto 6. Arvind Kumar Jha..................................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand..................................Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners:Mr.Sameer Saurabh For the State :A.P.P 3.18.07.13 This application has been filed for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding of Jorapokhar P.S. Case no.148 of 2011 including the order dated 24.7.2011 whereby and whereunder cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 287/304A of the Indian Penal Code has been taken against the petitioners. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that on 24.7.2011 while the informant along with Shankar Manjhi and Sudhir Bawri were working on 7th level at Patherdih Colliery, a huge stone fell down, as a result of which all the three persons sustained injuries, t...
Chandra Mohan Sharma Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Board Through Its ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
1 INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.551of2013 ChandraMohanSharma ... ... ... Petitioner Versus 1.JharkhandStateElectricityBoardthroughits Chairman,Ranchi 2.Secretary,JharkhandStateElectricityBoard, Ranchi ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR ForthePetitioner :Mr.RajendraKrishna,Advocate Mr.AmitSinha,Advocate FortheRespondents :Mr.O.P.Tiwari,Advocate 02/18.07.2013 The petitioner has approached this Court for the followingreliefs: (i) ForissuanceofawritinthenatureofMandamus commandingupontherespondentstoreleaseand to pay forthwith the transfer allowances which wasdeniedtothepetitioneronafrivolousground whilethepetitionerwastransferredfromPTPSto Swarnrekha Hydel Project at Sikidiri on 15.12.2010 and the petitioner repeatedly made request to the respondent authorities to pay the transfer allowances since the respondent authorities have paid the transfer allowances to other personnel/employees while being transferredfromPatratuThermalPowerStationto S...
Ms Hi Tech Chemicals Private Limited Through Its Managing Director Sri ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 1749 of 2013 M/s Hi-Tech Chemicals Private Limited Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand and another Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ----- 3/18.07.2013 Let this case be posted on 22.7.2013. Till then, production warrant issued against the petitioner shall not be executed. Let this order be communicated through FAX at the cost of the petitioner. (R.R. Prasad, J.) AKT...
Kunal Kishore Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.4817of2013 with B.A.No.4875of2013 with B.A.No.4887of2013 with B.A.No.5105of2013 AmalPatra@AnalPatar Petitioner(inB.A.No.4817of2013) ShyamalMurmu ....... Petitioner(inB.A.No.4875of2013) AviPrasadChatterjee .......... Petitioner(inB.A.No.4887of2013) KunalKishore ........ Petitioner(inB.A.No.5105of2013) Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.P .A.S.Pati(inB.A.No.4817of2013) Mr.K.P .Choudhary(inB.A.No.4875of2013) Mr.AjayKumarSah(inB.A.No.4887of2013) Mr.IndrajitSinha(inB.A.No.5105of2013) FortheState :A.P .P. 04/18.07.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. ItrevealsfromtheF.I.R.thatinviewofthedirectiongivenbytheDeputy Commissioner, Singhbhum East, premises of different company involved in bankingbusinesswereraidedanddocumentswereseizedfromtherespective officesofthosecompanies.Itwasdetectedthatthecompaniesreferredinthe F.I.R.,havebeencollectingtermdepositandrecurringdepositfromthepeople andthey...
Md Shakil Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Contempt(Cvl.)Case No. 706 of 2012 Md. Shakil ............ ... Petitioner Vrs. The State of Jharkhand and others ...... Respondents/O.Ps. ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH ------ For the Petitioner: Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Adv. For the Respondents/O.Ps.: J.C. to A.G. ------ Order No.6 Dated 18th July, 2013 As per order of this Court dated 12.05.2011, passed in W.P. (PIL) No.1892 of 2011 and particularly in I.A. Nos. 1361 and 1512 of 2011, the State was supposed to construct certain houses for the displaced persons of Islam Nagar. The houses have not been constructed which should have been constructed within 13 months from the date of the passing of the order. In this contempt case, this Court again on 22nd January, 2013, directed the State Government to take all endeavour to see the completion of the work expeditiously. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that yet construction has not been complete...
Firoz Alias Firoz Ahmad Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5205 of 2013 Firoz @ Firoz Ahmad Ansari ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Vivek Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 03/18.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case for the offence registered under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that allegation against the petitioner is that he is the Agent of the State Industrial Cooperative Federation Limited and he has taken money from 40 to 45 persons on giving them assurance that they will get loan of Rs. 20,000/- from the said Cooperative Federation, but neither any account of the said persons was opened in the said Federation nor any money was refunded to those persons. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he has denied a...
Md Nasim Ansari Alias Nasim Ansari and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.5114of2013 1.Md.NasimAnsari@NasimAnsari [email protected] 3.NasirAnsari .... .... . Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhand .... .... .... Opp.Party CORAM :HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioners :Mr.RajeshKumar,Advocate FortheState :A.P.P. 02/18.07.2013 Heard counsel appearing for the petitioners and counsel appearingfortheState. PetitionersareaccusedinthiscaseregisteredunderSections 413/414oftheIndianPenalCodeandSection17oftheC.L.A.Act. Counselappearingforthepetitionershassubmittedthatthisis a case of misuse of privilege of bail granted tothe petitioner. It isalso submittedthatthepresentpetitionersareincustodysince30thApril,2013 i.e.morethantwoandhalfmonths. Counsel appearing for the State has opposed and submitted thatthepetitionershavemisusedtheprivilegeofbailgrantedtohimfrom 6th March,2009andthereisnosatisfactoryexplanationforsuchalong misuse. Considering the submissions made by both the parties and consideringtheperiodofcustodywh...
Gitanjali Kumari Vs. Home Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 1864 of 2013 With I. A. No. 4872 of 2013 Gitanjali Kumari .. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Another .. Respondents ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ----- For the Petitioner - Mr. Manoj Tandon For the Respondents - Mr. J.C to A.G ----- 2/18.7.2013 In I. A. No. 4872/2013, the petitioner has prayed for early hearing of W.P.(S) No. 1864/2013. It has been submitted that the petitioner is the widow of the Constable, who died in an accident on 4.5.2010 while on duty. The petitioner is entitled for ex gratia compensation of Rs. 10 Lacs, but the same has not been paid. In view thereof, the matter is extremely urgent and deserves early hearing. Learned J.C to A.G appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that in spite of fixing an early date of hearing, the writ petition itself can be disposed of by issuing direction to the concerned respondent to dispose of the petitioner's claim. Learned counsel for the...