Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anita Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S).No.96of2012 AnitaDevi. .Petitioner. Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. ....Respondents. CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI ForthePetitioner : Mr.H.K.Mahato,Advocate FortheState : J.C.toG.P.V 07/18.07.2013: Thepetitionerhasprayedforquashingtheorderdated27th September, 2010 by which the petitioner's selection as Para Teacher of Upgraded Primary School, Sarnatoli Bela has been cancelled.2. Ithasbeenstatedthatthepetitionerwasdulyappointed as Para Teacher under Education Guarantee Scheme for SarnatoliBelabyresolutionoftheVillageEducationCommittee dated 22nd November, 2004. The petitioner's appointment was approvedbytheBlockEducationCommittee.Suddenly,bythe impugnedorderissuedbytheDistrictProgrammeOfficer,Ranchi byMemono.2426dated27thSeptember,2010(Annexure3),the petitioner'sappointmenthasbeencancelled.3. Thepetitionerhaschallengedtheimpugnedorderonthe groundthatbeforeremovingherfromthesaidpost,nonotice wasgiven,intimatingreasonsandnoopportunitywa...
Vijay Kumar Vs. Home Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
1 W.P.(S).No.520of2013 [InthematterofanapplicationunderArticle226oftheConstitutionofIndia] ........... VijayKumar ...Petitioner Versus 1.TheStateofJharkhandthroughtheSecretary 2.TheDirectorGeneralofPolice,Ranchi 3.TheInspectorGeneralofPolice,Bokaro 4.TheDeputyInspectorGeneralofPolice,Bokaro 5.TheSuperintendentofPolice,Dhanbad 6.TheDeputySuperintendentofPolice,Sindri,Dhanbad ...Respondents ............ ForthePetitioner :M/s.ManojTandon,KumariRashmi,Advocates FortheRespondents :Mr.PravinKr.Rana,J.C.toA.G. ............ PRESENT HON'BLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR ............. ByCourt: The petitioner has approached this Court seeking the followingreliefs: (i) To quash/ set aside the order dated 29.12.2010 contained in Memo No.1648 passed by the Respondent No.04 (Deputy Inspector General of Police, Koyla Range, Bokaro) whereby and whereunderthepetitionerwasdismissedfromservice withimmediateeffect. (ii) To quash/ set aside the appellate order containedinMemoNo.660dated08.10.2011,passed byth...
Kamakhya Prasad Tiwary Alias Kamakhya Tiwary Vs. the State of Jharkhan ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 1422 of 2013 Kamakhya Prasad Tiwary @ Kamakhya Tiwary Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand and another Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ----- 2/18.07.2013 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was the owner of the land, which was acquired, for which compensation was given to him to the tune of Rs. 8,54,761.67/- but the complainant by putting a false claim that he is the registered owner of the land filed a case alleging therein that this petitioner by claiming himself to be the landlord withdrew the amount of compensation which allegation in the face of several documents gets falsified and thereby the prosecution cannot be maintained against the petitioner. In view of the submission, let notice be issued to the opposite party no. 2 to show cause as to why this application be not admitted and/...
Shanti Devi Vs. the Union of India Through the Engineer in Chief a H O ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.434of2013 ShantiDevi ..... Petitioner Versus TheUnionofIndia&Ors. . Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR ForthePetitioner :Mr.AnilKr.Sinha,Advocate FortheU.O.I. :Mr.FaizUrRahman,C.G.C. 3/18.07.2013 The petitioner has claimed release of deathcumretiral benefitsincludingleaveencashment,gratuity,etc.andappointment forhersonnamelyAjayRamoncompassionateground. The husband of the petitioner died on 13.06.2000 however,theretiralbenefitsofthehusbandofthepetitionerhasnot beenpaidtothepetitioner.Shehasmaderepresentationalsotothe authoritieshowever,noactionhasbeentakenbytheauthorities. Inviewoftheaforesaidfacts,learnedcounselappearing forthepetitionersubmitsthatthiswritpetitionmaybedisposedof withthedirectiontotherespondentstotakedecisionontheclaimof the petitioner and the petitioner may be directed to file a detailed representationwiththeauthorities. Permission,asprayedfor,isgranted. The petitioner is at liberty to prefer a detailed r...
Arbind Mishra Vs. Water Resources Departement
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.331 of 2013 with I.A. no.4718 of 2013 Arbind Mishra . Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...Respondents Coram : The Honble Mr. Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari For the Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Pathak, Advocate For the Respondents : J.C. to S.C.I ----- 2/18.07.2013 In I.A. no.4718 of 2013, the petitioner has prayed for fixing an early date of hearing of W.P.(S) no.331 of 2013. It has been submitted that the petitioner has reached the age of superannuation and is due to retire on 31.07.2013. The petitioner has not been given time bound promotion and the benefits of ACP and MACP. The petitioner, in such circumstance, shall be deprived of his due pensionary benefits on his retirement. The matter is urgent and requires early hearing and disposal. Learned J.C. to S.C.I, appearing on behalf of the respondents, submitted that the petitioner's claim is pending before the concerned authority and instead of fixing a date, the writ petition it...
Gidu Machua Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5305 of 2013 Gidu Machua ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 02/18.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case for the offence registered under Sections 452, 341, 342, 323, 324 & 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that it has come in the impugned order that the injuries are simple in nature. It is also submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 11.12.2012 i.e. more than seven months. Learned counsel for the State has opposed and submitted that the description of the injuries mentioned in this impugned order does not seems to be simple in nature, but he has not disputed the period of custody of the petitioner. Considering the facts and circumstances of the cas...
Sanjay Prasad Yadav and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 943 o1. Sanjay Prasad Yadav 2. Sanjapi Devi 3. Ramlal @ Ramlal Yadav 4. Rajendra Prasad Yadav 5. Jyoti Yadav @ Jyoti Devi 6. Mahendra Prasad Yadav 7. Aradhna Yadav @ Aradhana Devi 8. Surendra Prasad Yadav 9. Usha Devi . Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. K. K. Singh, Advocate For the State : APP ----- 04/18.05.2013: Order dated 16.06.2012, passed in C.P. Case No.454 of 2012 under which cognizance of the offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code has been taken against the petitioner, is being sought to be quashed on the ground that the matrimonial dispute got resolved. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that a complaint was lodged by the Opp. Party No.2, on the allegation that after the marriage, she was being subjected to torture by these petitioners on account of non-fulfillment of the demand of the do...
Manpreet Singh Alias Manjeet Singh Alias Manprit Singh Vs. the State o ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5298 of 2013 Manpreet Singh @ Manjeet Singh @ Manprit Singh Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kr. Sah, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 02/18.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case for the offence registered under Sections 406, 409, 420, 379, 120(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that regarding the same offence number of cases has been registered against the petitioner in various police station, but some of the cases, the present petitioner has already been granted bail by another Bench of this Court in B.A. No. 1956 of 2013 vide order dated 03.04.2013, and another case i.e. B.A. No. 4810 of 2013 vide order dated 31.05.2013. It is also submitted name of the petitioner has come only on the confession...
Birendra Kumar Bhatia Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1902of2013 BirendraKumarBhatia .... .... . Petitioner Versus 1.TheStateofJharkhand 2.DharamRajYadav .... .... .... Opp.Parties CORAM :HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.Shailesh,Advocate FortheState :A.P.P. 03/18.07.2013 Office note shows that neither A/D nor undelivered registeredcoverhasbeenreceivedasyetasreportedbyCr.Receiving Section. Office note further shows that ordinary process has been receivedwithareportofprocessserverthatwifeofO.P.No.2has refusedtotakethenotice. As notice issued by registered cover has not yet been served,thecounselofthepetitionerisdirectedtotakestepsforfresh service of notice by registered cover with A/D at the present and correctaddressofoppositepartyno.2forwhichrequisiteetc.mustbe filedwithinaperiodofoneweekfromthedateofthisorder,failing whichthisapplicationshallstandrejectedwithoutfurtherreferenceto theBench. Tilltheninterimorderdated14.05.2013shallcontinue. (JayaRoy,J.) Anit...
Shanti Das Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-18-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 5265 of 2013 Shanti Das ........... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand ...... ......... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Kaushal Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ---- 3/ 18.07.2013 Heard the counsel for petitioner and counsel for the State. The petitioner is accused in this case registered under Section 302, 328, 34 of I.P.C. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other three persons assaulted the victim by feasts and slaps and also by Mukka result of which he died on the same date. Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no specific allegation and only omnibus allegation. It is also submitted that the petitioner is in custody from 24.5.2012 i.e. more than a year. Counsel for the State opposed but he has accepted that the petitioner has assaulted only by feasts and slaps and he has...
- ‹ Prev
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 112
- Next ›
- Last »