Jharkhand Court July 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Lalo Sa and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5329 o1. Lalo Sao 2. Kali Sao 3. Chando Sao @ Chandrika Sao ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioners : Mr. Ashim Kr. Sahani, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 04/19.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are accused in a case for the offence registered under Sections 15 & 18 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that allegation against the petitioners in the F.I.R is that posta plants have been found cultivated in the land which belongs to the petitioners. Learned counsel for the petitioners has further submitted that the petitioners are not possession over the land this land has already occupied by M.C.C. People and they have no concern with the posta plants cultivated in the land. It is also submitted that the petitioners are in custody since 04.05....
Saddam Khan Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5041 of 2013 Saddam Khan .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. PAS Pati For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 19.07.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is accused in connection with Adityapyur PS case No. 148 of 2012 for the offence registered under sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. There is allegation in the fard beyan that the petitioner with his two brothers, namely Kalim and Aurangjeb, had been to the house of the informant where some altercation took place between Kalim and wife of the informant where-after Kalim took out pistol and opened fire causing injuries on the thigh of the informant. He also caused injuries to the wife of the informant by using firearms. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. No overt act is alleged against hi...
Sajesh Kumar Lal and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No.236 of 2013 Sajesh Kumar Lal & Ors. .............. ......... petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ............ Opp. Parties. .............. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI .............. For the Appellants : Mr. Amit Kr. Tiwari, Advocate For the Opp. Parties : J.C. to S.C.III ............. 3/19.07.2013: In this petition, the petitioners have prayed for amendment in pararaph-8 of the writ petition and consequent modification in the order dated 7.5.2013 passed in W.P.(S) No.2758/2013. It has been stated that the petitioner no.12 namely Prem Kumar was not untrained Graduate in the year 1994. He was I.Sc. at the time of appointment and later on he became Science Graduate on 14.10.1997. The said fact could not be inadvertently mentioned in the writ petition. The said order was accordingly passed. It has been submitted that the petitioner shall suffer irreparable loss and injury, if the petitioner is not allowed ...
Jetha Pahan and ors Vs. Randhia Pahan and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI S.A. No. 67 of 2001 Jetha Pahan & Ors. ..Appellants Versus Randhia Pahan & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Appellants : Mr. Satyendra Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : None ---- I.A. No. 99/2013 21/19-07-2013 In this application, the appellants have prayed for substitution of heirs and legal representatives of appellant no.2. It has been stated that the appellant no. 2-Soma Pahan died during pendency of the appeal on 13.10.2012 leaving behind his widow and sons, whose names and addresses are given in paragraph 2 of the application. The application is within the time. Though copy of the application has been served on the counsel for the respondents, no one appears to oppose the application. Considering the above, this I.A is allowed. Let the heirs and legal representatives of appellant no. 2, whose names and addresses are given in paragraph 2 of the application, be substituted in place of deceased...
Sunil Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.4500of2013 SunilKumar .... .... . Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand .... .... .... Opp.Party CORAM :HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.A.K.Sahani,Advocate FortheState :A.P.P. 04/19.07.2013 Heard counsel appearingforthepetitionerandcounsel appearingfortheState. Petitioner is an accused in this case registered under Sections468/471/406/420/120BoftheIndianPenalCode. Counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that earliertheprayerforbailofthepetitionerwasrejectedbythisCourt inB.A.No.685of2013videorderdated7thFebruary,2013.Itisalso submittedthatthepetitionerisincustodysince9th November,2012 i.e. more than eight months. Counsel forthe petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is ready to deposit a sum of Rs.1,06,754/lyinginthebankaccountofthepetitioneratBankof India, Club Side Branch, Main Road, Ranchi bearing A/c No.490210110006274. Counsel appearing for the State has opposed and submittedthatthepetitionerhascheated...
Arti Dutta and ors Vs. Shankar Dutta (Moira) and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI S.A. No. 151 of 2002 Arti Dutta & Others ..Appellants Versus Shankar Dutta ( Moira) & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Appellants : Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. I. Sinha, Advocate ---- I.A. No. 3756/2012 08/19-07-2013 Learned counsel for the appellants does not press the instant I.A. This I.A is accordingly rejected as not pressed. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Hafiz Ansari Alias HafizuddIn Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5328 of 2013 Hafiz Ansari @ Hafizuddin Ansari ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kr. Sah, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 04/19.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case for the offence registered under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the F.I.R. is registered against unknown, the petitioner's name has come only on the secret information. It is also submitted that though the petitioner is in custody from 09.05.2013, but till date he was not put on T.I. parade. It is also submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State has opposed and submitted that it has come in the investigation one motorcycle which was used by the petiti...
Krishna Munduiya Alias Krishna Chandna Munduia Alias Chocho Vs. the St ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5357 of 2013 Krishna Munduiya @ Krishna Chandra Munduia @ Chocho ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajendra Pd. Gupta, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 02/19.07.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case for the offence registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 353, 342, 338, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the F.I.R. has been registered against unknown and name of the petitioner has come only on the confessional statement of the co- accused, namely, Mohan Das @ Jagmohan Das. It is also contended that the said co-accused, namely, Mohan Das @ Jagmohan Das has already been granted bail by another Bench of this Court in B.A. No. 4618 of 2013 vide order dated 10.06.2013. It is also submitted that the petitio...
Ruplal Mahto Alias Ruplal Bharti Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2227 of 2013 Ruplal Mahto @ Ruplal Bharti .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Prabhat Kumar Sinha For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 19.07.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for anticipatory bail flied by the petitioner in connection with Bishnugarh PS case No. 49 of 2013 for the offence registered under sections 467/468/471/420/120B/414/34 of the Indian Penal Code, section 30(ii) of the Coal mines Act and under section 33 of the Indian Forest Act. It reveals that the truck bearing registration no. JH09N- 8894 was apprehended while it was carrying coal without papers. On interrogation, the driver disclosed names of the persons involved in illegal trade of coal including name of this petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner has no concern either with coal or ...
Madan Sao Alias Madan Prasad Sahu Vs. State of Jharkhandq
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jul-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1844 of 2013 Madan Sao ... ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Mahesh Prasad Sahu ... ... ... Opposite Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Sarju Prasad, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 02/19.07.2013 Petitioner has filed this Cr.M.P application for modification of the order dated 13.06.2013 passed in A.B.A. No. 1791 of 2013 to the extent that for including the name of the present petitioner (in Cr.M.P. No. 1844 of 2013) namely, Madan Sao in the said order. It is also submitted that the present petitioner (in Cr.M.P. No. 1844 of 2013) was also a party in the aforesaid anticipatory bail application i.e. A.B.A. No. 1791 of 2013, as the petitioner No.4, namely, Madan Sao, but inadvertently his name is not mentioned in the aforesaid order dated 13.06.2013 passed in the said anticipatory bail application. Considering the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and going throu...
- ‹ Prev
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- Next ›
- Last »