Jharkhand Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Hasina Khatoon Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2208 of 2013 Hasina Khatoon ... ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Kumar Choubey For the State : Mr. T.N. Verma, A.P.P. ........ 2/20.06.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Hasina Khatoon is moved by Sri Umesh Kumar Choubey, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri T.N. Verma, learned Additional PP. for the State. Main allegation of abduction is against co-accused Nasim Khan. It is submitted that aforesaid Nasim Khan has been granted regular bail by the learned court below vide order dated 20.04.2013 in B.P. No. 561 of 2013. There is no allegation against this petitioner that she assisted the co-accused for abducting complainant's daughter. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I allow this anticipatory bail application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court belo...
Prem Kumar Sinha Vs. Collectariate
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(PIL)No.205of2013 PremKumarSinha .... .... .... Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhand&Ors. .... .... ....Respondents CORAM :HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.P.C.Tripathy,Sr.Advocate FortheRespondents :Mr.RajeshShankar,G.A. th OrderNo.05 Dated,20 June,2013 Inviewoftheinvolvementofgrievanceofpoorpersons, wedeemitpropertogivedirectiontotheDeputyCommissioner, GiridihtolookintothegrievanceofthemembersofB.P.L.,whoare having the grievance that they are not getting supply of food materials and they are resident of six Panchayats namely 1. Senadoni, 2. Sihodih, 3. Mohanpur, 4. Baxidih, 5. Bajato & 6. Phulchi. The D.C., Giridih may look in the allegation and may examinethegrievanceoftheB.P.L.memberswhoneednottocome againintheCourtforgettingsuchreliefwhichismadeavailable undertheschemetothosepersonswhoareinneed. Therefore,theDeputyCommissionerisrequiredtotake specialcarelookingtotheplightofthepersonswhoaremembersof the B.P.L....
Chhunki Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A.No. 3712 of 2013 With B.A No.3893 of 2013 Chhunki Ansari ... Petitioner(B.A No.3712/13) 1. Bhola @ Sanaullah Ansari 2. Ataul @ Attaullah Ansari ....... Petitioners(B.A No.3893/13) Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr.J.S.Singh, Advocate. Mr.A.K.Singh, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 3/ 17.06.2013 Both these applications arise out of the same case, as such, they are being disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Kuru P.S. Case No. 81 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 395 of 2012 for the offence under Sections 302/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to murder of the husband of the informant, who came to house and informed the informant that six persons including these petitioners had assaulted him. Sub...
Ram Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(PIL) No. 164 of 2009 Ram Kumar Singh ...... Petitioner Vs. Union of India & Ors. ... Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ---- For the Petitioner: Mr. V.P. Singh, Sr. Adv. For the UOI : Md. M. Khan, ASGI Order No. 23 ------ Dated 20th June, 2013 Learned counsel for the respondents raised objection that the present writ petition cannot be entertained in view of the bar created by Article 329 of the Constitution, which provides not only bars to interference by courts in electoral matters but also bars for interference in the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constitutionalities or the allotment of seats to such constitutionalities made or purporting to be made under Article 327 or Article 328.. Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to satisfy this Court that this petition can be entertained in spite of such bar created by Article 329(a). Put up this case on 9th July, 2013. (Pra...
Sanjay Jalandhara Alias Sanjay Kumawat Vs. the State of Jharkhand and ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.230 of 2013 Sanjay Jalandhara @ Sanjay Kumawat...........Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ............. Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner : Mr.S.K.Dwivedi For the State :A.P.P 4.20.6.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that a complaint was lodged by the complainant alleging therein that the accused Ananda Lal Gupta, Director of M/s. Nix Marketing Private Limited issued a cheque in favour of the complainant which was not honoured on account of the fact that by that time the cheque could have been presented, instruction was given by the drawer to its banker for stopping of the payment but at the same time, this petitioner, who happens to be the Manager of M/s.Maharshi Ayurveda and the Chief Executive Officer were also made accused on simple allegation that these two persons are also in association with Ananda Lal Gupta. On such allegation, cognizance of the offen...
Krishna Karmali and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 2169 o1. Krishna Karmali 2. Charan Karmali 3. Ravi Karmali .........Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. P.S. Dayal For the State: Mr. P.K. Appu, APP 2/20.06.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioners Krishna Karmali, Charan Karmali and Ravi Karmali is moved by Sri P.S. Dayal and opposed by Sri P.K. Appu, learned Additional P.P. From perusal of FIR, I find that the allegation of demanding extortion money is upon co-accused S.N. Singh @ Sachidanand Singh. So far these petitioners are concerned, it is alleged that they committed mischief in the shop of informant. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioners to surrender in the court below by 01.07.2013 and in that event the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioners, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs....
Sangram Birua and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3578 o1. Sangram Birua 2. Gura Birua 3. Sonaram Birua 4. Tunu Birua ... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioners : Mr.Pravin Kumar, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 3/ 17.06.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Manjhari P.S. Case No. 5 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 107 of 2012, S.T No.174 of 2012 for the offence under Sections 302/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioners are named in the FIR and from the FIR, it appears that the informant is an eyewitness to the occurrence who has alleged that the accused persons had committed the murder of his brother. There is direct allegation against the petitioner No.1, Sangram Birua to have committed murder of the deceased by a heavy stone. Learned counsel for the petitioners has ...
Sachidanand Singh Alias S N Singh and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand a ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2206 o1. Sachidanand Singh @ S.N. Singh 2. Pravanjan Singh .. ... ... Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Charanjeet Singh ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioners : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate Mr. Suraj Kumar For the State : Mr. P.K. Appu, A.P.P. ........ 2/20.06.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioners Sachidanand Singh @ S.N. Singh and Pravanjan Singh is moved by Sri R.S. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri P.K. Appu, learned Additional PP. for the State. F.I.R. reveals that petitioners have threatened the complainant either not to buy the house or pay Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rs.One lakh) as extortion. There is nothing to show that said money was paid to petitioners. It further appears that petitioners also filed a case against complainant vide Annexure-2. It also appears that there is dispute between the parties regarding the posses...
Madhusudan Singh and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1460 o1. Madhusudan Singh 2. Vimla Devi @ Vimla Singh 3. Rakhi Kumari @ Rakhi Singh 4. Sailja Singh @ Sailja @ Munni Singh 5. Gopal Krishna Singh @ Gopi Krishna Singh 6. Binod Kumar Singh @ Binod Singh 7. Subodh Kumar Singh 8. Brajesh Kumar Singh 9. R.A.Rai @ Ram Anandi Rai................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand ...................... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners : Mr.Anil Kumar For the State : A.P.P 2.20.6.13. I.A.No.3827 of 2013 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the State. This application had been filed for quashing of the order taking cognizance but while the application was pending, an order was passed on 7.6.2013 whereby warrant of arrest non-bailable was ordered to be issued without service of summons and therefore, that order has been challenged by way of this interlocutory application and hence, prayer made in the inter...
Mithun Das Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 2198 of 2013. ----- Mithun Das Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. . ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri. Prabir Chatterjee For the State : Sri.P.K.Jaiswal, A.P.P. ----- 02/20.06.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Mithun Das is moved by Sri. Prabir Chatterjee , learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri. P.K.Jaiswal , Addl P.P. for the State. It appears that statement of victim girl was recorded under section 164 Cr.P.C. In the said statement she stated that she eloped with the petitioner out of her own sweet will and later on married with him. She further disclosed her age as 19 years. Annexure-3 reveals that doctor after examining victim girl had assessed her age as 19 years. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner, named above, to surrender in the court below by 01/07/2013 . If petit...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »