Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ram Kumar Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Ram Kumar Singh vs Union of India and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 20, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972701

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ram Kumar Singh

Respondent

Union of India and ors.

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(pil) no. 164 of 2009 ram kumar singh ...... petitioner vs. union of india & ors. ... respondents ------ coram: hon'ble the chief justice hon'ble mrs. justice jaya roy ---- for the petitioner: mr. v.p. singh, sr. adv. for the uoi : md. m. khan, asgi order no. 23 ------ dated 20th june, 2013 learned counsel for the respondents raised objection that the present writ petition cannot be entertained in view of the bar created by article 329 of the constitution, which provides not only bars to interference by courts in electoral matters but also bars for interference in the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constitutionalities or the allotment of seats to such constitutionalities made or purporting to be made under article 327 or article 328.. learned counsel for the petitioner wants to satisfy this court that this petition can be entertained in spite of such bar created by article 329(a). put up this case on 9th july, 2013. (prakash tatia, c j) (jaya roy, j) alankar/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(PIL) No. 164 of 2009 Ram Kumar Singh ...... Petitioner Vs. Union of India & Ors. ... Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ---- For the Petitioner: Mr. V.P. Singh, Sr. Adv. For the UOI : Md. M. Khan, ASGI Order No. 23 ------ Dated 20th June, 2013 Learned counsel for the respondents raised objection that the present writ petition cannot be entertained in view of the bar created by Article 329 of the Constitution, which provides not only bars to interference by courts in electoral matters but also bars for interference in the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constitutionalities or the allotment of seats to such constitutionalities made or purporting to be made under Article 327 or Article 328.. Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to satisfy this Court that this petition can be entertained in spite of such bar created by Article 329(a). Put up this case on 9th July, 2013. (Prakash Tatia, C J) (Jaya Roy, J) Alankar/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial