Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Hasina Khatoon Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Hasina Khatoon vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 20, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972779

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Hasina Khatoon

Advocate Sri. Umesh Kumar Choubey

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand ranchi a. b. a. no. 2208 of 2013 hasina khatoon ... ... ... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand ... ... opp. party coram: honble mr. justice prashant kumar ............ for the petitioner : mr. umesh kumar choubey for the state : mr. t.n. verma, a.p.p. ........ 2/20.06.2013 anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner hasina khatoon is moved by sri umesh kumar choubey, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by sri t.n. verma, learned additional pp. for the state. main allegation of abduction is against co-accused nasim khan. it is submitted that aforesaid nasim khan has been granted regular bail by the learned court below vide order dated 20.04.2013 in b.p. no. 561 of 2013. there is no allegation against this petitioner that she assisted the co-accused for abducting complainant's daughter. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, i allow this anticipatory bail application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below on or before 1st of july 2013 and in the event of her surrender, the learned court below is directed to enlarge her on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, hazaribagh in connection with sadar (mufasil) p.s. case no. 660 of 2012 corresponding to g.r. no. 3451 of 2012, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr. p.c. (prashant kumar, j.) binit

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2208 of 2013 Hasina Khatoon ... ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Kumar Choubey For the State : Mr. T.N. Verma, A.P.P. ........ 2/20.06.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Hasina Khatoon is moved by Sri Umesh Kumar Choubey, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri T.N. Verma, learned Additional PP. for the State. Main allegation of abduction is against co-accused Nasim Khan. It is submitted that aforesaid Nasim Khan has been granted regular bail by the learned court below vide order dated 20.04.2013 in B.P. No. 561 of 2013. There is no allegation against this petitioner that she assisted the co-accused for abducting complainant's daughter. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I allow this anticipatory bail application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below on or before 1st of July 2013 and in the event of her surrender, the learned court below is directed to enlarge her on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh in connection with Sadar (Mufasil) P.S. Case No. 660 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 3451 of 2012, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial