Jharkhand Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Pushpendra Kumar Sinha Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation Through Its ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(Cr.) No.108 of 2013 Pushpendra Kumar Sinha .....................................Petitioner VERSUS Central Bureau of Investigation and others...Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner:Mr.R.S.Majumdar, Sr. Advocate For the C.B. I : Mr. M.Khan, Advocate 2/ 21.6.13. The only concern which has been shown by Mr.Majumdar, learned Sr. counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the petitioner is being prosecuted for the same offence by the C.B.I as well as Vigilance. It was further submitted that pursuant to the order passed by the Division Bench, investigation of the case lodged by the Vigilance was taken over by the C.B.I. However, the stand of the C.B.I is that the C.B.I is no more investigating the case, rather the case is being investigated by the Vigilance. In that view of the matter, I do not find any merit in this case and hence, this application stands dismissed. (R.R. Prasad, J.) ND/...
Ms K G Sales Corporation Vs. Abhay Tele Engg Private Limited
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI CompanyPetitionNo.5of2012 M/sK.G.SalesCorporation,Ranchi . Petitioner Versus AbhayTeleEngg.PrivateLimited,Ranchi .... Respondent CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner :Mr.RahulSaboo,Advocate 04/Dated:21 st June,2013 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is due of Rs. 4,78,531/ to be paid by the respondent to the petitioner, for which, a noticedated23rd August,2012wasalsogiven,whichisatAnnexure5tothe memoofthiscompanypetition.Therespondenthasreceivedsuchnotice,but no reply has been given nor due has been paid by the respondent and, therefore,thiswindinguppetitionhasbeenpreferredunderSections433(e), 434and439oftheCompaniesAct,1956.2. Inviewoftheaforesaidsubmission,noticeuponrespondenttobeserved throughordinaryprocess,forwhich,requisitesetc.mustbefiledwithinone week.3. Noticeismadereturnableon26thJuly,2013. (D.N.Patel,J.) Ajay...
Ajay Kumar Bharti Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 562 of 2012 Ajay Kumar Bharti ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Another .. Opposite Parties -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 8/ 21.06.2013 At the request of the counsel for opposite party no. 2, list this case after two weeks for filing counter affidavit. In the meantime, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner with respect to Miscellaneous Case no. 28 of 2011 in the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Garhwa. ( H. C. Mishra, J.) R.Kr....
Tapas Sarkar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3380 of 2012 Tapas Sarkar ... ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Chandan Mittal ... ... ... Opposite Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. D.K. Pathak, Advocate 12/21.06.2013 Both the parties have prayed for an adjournment, put up this case on 26.06.2013 under the same heading in Court. Till then, interim order dated 15.03.2013 shall continue. (Jaya Roy, J.) Satayendra...
Sita Ram Prasad Verma Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 2241 of 2013. ----- Sita Ram Prasad Verma Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri R.S. Mazumdar For the State : Sri S. Prakash Jha, A.P.P. ----- 02/20.06.2013. Call for the case diary from the court concerned and put up this case after receipt of the same. In the meantime, petitioner shall not be arrested in connection with Lalmatia P.S. case no. 65 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. no.1192/12, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Godda. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) Pramanik/...
Chuna Soren Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 2176 of 2013 Chuna Soren .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K. Das For the State: Mr. G.S. Prasad,APP 2/20.06.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Chuna Soren is moved by Sri A.K. Das and opposed by Sri G.S. Prasad, learned Additional P.P. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. In the case diary one of the witness who appears to be a chance witness, took the name of petitioner that he has also involved in the commission of present crime. No specific overt act alleged against this petitioner. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below by 01.07.2013 and in that event the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- ( Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amou...
Manoj Yadav Alias Manoj Kumar Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.2236of2013 ManojYadav@ManojKumarYadav Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.AnilKr.Sinha,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 02/20.06.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. PetitionerisaccusedinconnectionwithKodermaP.S.CaseNo.96of2013, correspondingtoG.R.CaseNo.428of2013,pendingintheCourtoflearned ChiefJudicialMagistrate,Koderma. Itisallegedthatthetruckbelongingtothepetitionerwasfoundcarrying stonechipswithoutvalidpermitandchallan. It is submitted that all the 27 vehicles loaded with stone chips were apprehendedbythepoliceanditwasassuredthatwhicheverofthevehicleis foundcarryingstonechipsonthebasisofvaliddocument,thatvehicleshallbe released.Thepetitionerhadshownvalidpermitandchallanbuthisvehiclewas notreleased. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbailand submitsthatnochallanwasproducedagainsttransportationofstonechips. Sincethevehiclebelongingtothe petitionerwasfo...
Pravil Ganjhu Alias Palamu Ganjhu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3899 of 2013 Pravil Ganjhu @ Palamu Ganjhu ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.H.K.Shikarwar, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 3/ 18.06.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Katkamsandi P.S. Case No. 191 of 2007 corresponding to G.R. No. 2018 of 2007, S.T No.89 of 2013 for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 302, 379 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code and 17 of the CLA Act. There is allegation against 30-35 members of the extremists group including the petitioner to have committed murder of the son of the informant. The FIR clearly shows that the informant is an eyewitness to the occurrence but he has not made any specific allegation of assault against this petitioner. In the facts of this case, I am inclined ...
Raj Kumar Ahuja Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1934of2013 RajKumarAhuja Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.PraveenShankarDayal,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 04/20.06.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. ItrevealsfromthewrittenreportthataTatapickupvan207bearing registrationnot JH05AR2469,loadedwithporacoalpackedindifferentbags weighingabout8quintal,wasseizedbythepolice.Thedriverofthevehicleas wellasownerofcoalwereapprehended. Itissubmittedthatpetitionerhappenstobeownerofsaidpickupvan andhehas noconcernwiththe illegaltradeofcoal. Itis evidentfromthe writtenreportitselfthatownerofcoalwasRajeshMalakarwhowasarrestedon thespot. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbail. Consideringthefactsandcircumstances,quantityofcoal beingcarried onthepickupvan,IfeelinclinedtogivebenefitofSection438Cr.P.C.tothe petitioner. Accordingly,abovenamedpetitionerisdirectedtosurrenderbeforethe Courtbelowwithinaperiodofthreeweek...
Hazra Khatoon and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 2173 o1. Hazra Khatoon 2. Nasibun Nisa 3. Munna .........Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. Md. Kaisar Alam For the State: Mr. S.K. Dubey, APP 42/20.06.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioners Hazra Khatoon, Nasibun Nisa and Munna is moved by Md. Kaisar Alam and opposed by Sri S.K.Dubey, learned Additional P.P. It appears that the co-accused Majid @ Imayat Llahi @ Zamayat Ellahi has been granted regular bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 7.6.2013 in BA No. 5057 of 2013. The case of aforesaid co-accused is similar to these petitioners. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioners to surrender in the court below by 01.07.2013 and in that event the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioners, above named, on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »