Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Tapas Sarkar Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Tapas Sarkar vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 21, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972799

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Tapas Sarkar

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi a.b.a. no. 3380 of 2012 tapas sarkar ... ... petitioner versus 1.the state of jharkhand 2. chandan mittal ... ... ... opposite parties --- coram : hon'ble mrs. justice jaya roy for the petitioner : mr. indrajit sinha, advocate for the state : a. p. p. for the o.p. no.2 : mr. d.k. pathak, advocate 12/21.06.2013 both the parties have prayed for an adjournment, put up this case on 26.06.2013 under the same heading in court. till then, interim order dated 15.03.2013 shall continue. (jaya roy, j.) satayendra

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3380 of 2012 Tapas Sarkar ... ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Chandan Mittal ... ... ... Opposite Parties --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. D.K. Pathak, Advocate 12/21.06.2013 Both the parties have prayed for an adjournment, put up this case on 26.06.2013 under the same heading in Court. Till then, interim order dated 15.03.2013 shall continue. (Jaya Roy, J.) Satayendra

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial