Jharkhand Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.1175of2012 Dr.VinodKumar . Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&ors. .... OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner :Mr.RajanRaj,Advocate FortheState :J.C.toG.P.II ForOppositePartyNos.2&3 :Mr.PramodKumarChoudhary,Advocate ForOppositePartyNo.4 :Mr.RajeshShankar,Advocate 05/Dated:21 st June,2013 1. Learned counsel for the University submitted that they have already writtenalettertotheJharkhandPublicServiceCommissionandtheJharkhand PublicServiceCommissionhasalsogivenreplytotheUniversitybyletterdated 18thJune,2013thattheUniversityhadsentincompletepapersand,thereafter, noreplyhasbeengivenbytheSidhuKanhuUniversity.2. Learnedcounselforoppositepartynos.2and3isseekingtimetogive reply to the Jharkhand Public Service Commission of their letter dated 18thJune,2013.3. Thematteris,therefore,adjournedtobelistedon28thJune,2013. (D.N.Patel,J.) Ajay...
Mangal Singh Korwa Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 321 of 2013 Mangal Singh Korwa ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Another .. Opposite Parties -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mrs. Gouri Debi, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 5/ 21.06.2013 This revision application will be heard. Admit. Issue notice to the opposite party No. 2, for which requisites etc. must be filed within one week through registered cover with A/D as also through ordinary process, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. Call for the Lower Court Records. During the pendency of this revision application, the petitioner, Mangal Singh Korwa, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of Sri Bimlesh Kumar Sahay, learned Civil Judge (Junior Division)- cum-Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chaiba...
Satyendra Kumar Singh and ors Vs. Coal India Limited Through Its Chair ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 3562 of 2013 Satyendra Kumar Singh and others ...... Petitioners Vrs. Coal India Limited and others ...... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Adv. For the Respondents: Mr. M. Khan, ASGI Order No.2 Dated 21st June, 2013. Defects pointed out by the office are ignored. Admit. List along with W.P.(T) No. 3087 of 2013 and connected matters. Meanwhile, operation of the communication dated 07.5.2013 and consequently recovery of the amount from the writ petitioners is hereby stayed. It is made clear that in case petitioners fail in the writ petition then they shall have to pay interest amount if it is required to be paid to the concerned taxing authority. (Prakash Tatia,C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) Sudhir...
Rubby Devi Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Transfer Petition (c) No. 18 of 2013 Rubby Devi .... .. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr. ...... Opp. Parties --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the petitioner : Mr. Rajendra Pd. Gupta, Adv. For the Opp. Parties : Mr. Srijit Choudhary, Adv. - -- 2/21.06.2013 Petitioner by way of present petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking transfer of Matrimonial Case No.29 of 2013 filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, for restitution of Conjugal rights from the court of Principal Judge Family Court at Sahebganj to Principal Judge, Family Court, Hazaribagh. Upon hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and on perusal of materials placed on record issue urgent show cause notice to opposite parties by registered post with A/D as well as ordinary process within one week, for which requisites etc. must be filed. The notice is returnable after four weeks. In the mean time status quo shall ...
Swarn Singh Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation Through Deputy Superin ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.Rev.No.80 of 2013 Swarn Singh ......................................Petitioner VERSUS Central Bureau of Investigation, through S.P, Dhanbad ............... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner:Mr.N.K.Pasari For the C.B. I. : Mr.M. Khan 8/ 21.6.13. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the C.B.I. Before proceeding in the matter, an order passed on 5.12.2011 in Cr.M.P.No.1275 of 2011 needs to be recorded which reads as follows: When the C.B.I raided the residential house of the petitioner,cash, jewellaries, shares, bonds, IVP, NSC, KVP and other documents worth Rs.1,40,00,000/- were found and on that basis, prosecution was initiated for an offence under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(e) of the Prevention of Corruption Act for possessing the asset disproportionate to known source of income. Since the other materials had also been seized which had no connectio...
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Through Its Chief Accounts Officer Shri A ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 817 of 2013 with W.P.(T) No. 820 of 2013 with W.P.(T) No. 824 of 2013 ------ Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL).. Petitioner Vs. Union of India & Ors. ... Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ---- For the Petitioner: Mr. B. Poddar, Sr. Adv. Mr. Darshana P. Mishra & Piyush Poddar, Advocates For the Respondents: Mr. Ratnesh Kumar, Adv. ------ Dated 21st June, 2013 Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. Learned counsel for the respondents pointed out that in all connected matters including in these matters, the petitions have been entertained finding the position that because of the circular issued by the Central Government that in case where appellate authority or the revisional authority has not passed any interim order within a period of one month then recovery may be started and this Court found that in most of the places in the entire country the appellate authorities were not functio...
P and M Infrastructure Ltd Through Its Authorised Representative Mr Vi ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 6199 of 2012 with analogous cases ---- P and M Infrastructure Ltd ---- --- --- Petitioner vs. The State of Jharkhand & others --- --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh --- For the Petitioner: Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate For the State: Mr. Ajit Kumar, AAG, For the Respondent No.4: Mr. G.M.Mishra, Advocate --- I.A. No. 3306/2013 --- 11/ 21.06.2013 The present writ application is one of the batch of writ petitions led by WPC No. 6138/12 in which an interim order has been passed on 7th March 2013. The said order was passed on the specific undertaking of the other petitioners that they would carry out further construction activities at their own risk and cost and would not claim any equity in respect of the same. This petitioner though had filed an undertaking to that effect but the same was withdrawn at the time of passing of the interim order.2. By way of the present I.A., the writ petitioner however o...
Harendra Kumar Ghosh and Another Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.614of2012 HarendraKumarGhoshandanother . Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhand&ors. .... OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioners :Mr.PratuishLala,Advocate FortheState :Mr.R.K.Shahi,J.C.toG.A. 05/Dated:21 st June,2013 1. Learnedcounselforthepetitionerssubmittedthattheorderpassedby thisCourtdated2nd February,2011inW.P.(S)No.1352of2007hasnotyet beencompliedwith.2. Mr. R.K. Shahi, learned J.C. to G.A. is seeking time to file counter affidavit.3. Itisamisfortuneofthepetitionersthatdespitethecopyofthecontempt applicationwasservedupontheofficeoftheAdvocateGeneraloftheStateof Jharkhandon22ndJune,2012,therespondentStatehasnotimetofilecounter affidavit.EvenmemorandumofappearanceunderCodeofCivilProcedurehas notbeenfiledbytheGovernment,tilltoday.4. IthereforedirecttheRegistryofthisCourttoissuenoticeuponopposite partynos.2,3and4inFormno.1underRule393oftheJharkhandHigh CourtRules,2001 andoppositepartynos.2,3and4 shallre...
Joackim Toppo and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.74of2012 JoackimToppo&others . Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhand&another .... OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioners :Mr.AltafHussain,Advocate FortheState :None 10/Dated:21 st June,2013 1. Learnedcounselforthepetitionershasarguedoutthecase,atlength.2. As nobody appears on behalf of the opposite parties, I hereby direct oppositepartyno.2toremainpersonallypresentbeforethisCourtonthenext dateofhearingat10:30a.m.orhemaydeputearesponsibleofficertoremain personallypresentbeforethisCourtonthenextdateofhearingat10:30a.m.3. Thematterisadjournedtobelistedon28thJune,2013. (D.N.Patel,J.) Ajay...
Devendra Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand Thr. Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-21-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.1025 of 2012 Devendra Kumar Singh.............................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand through C.B.I .. Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner:Mr.A.K.Kashyap, Sr. Advocate For the C. B. I : Mr. M.Khan, Advocate 10/ 21.6.13. Mr.Khan, learned counsel appearing for the C.B.I by referring to paragraph 21 of the counter affidavit submits that the matter is being re- examined by the Department of Personnel and Administrative Reform with respect to fact placed under Annexure 9 and it has been communicated that information of which would be given to the concerned person and therefore, the matter be posted for other day. Upon it, Mr. Kashyap, learned Sr. counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that it would be evident from the said document that the matter is under re-examination since last one year and therefore, if nothing comes within a reasonable period, the court must act upon the document e...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »