Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dr Vinod Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Dr Vinod Kumar vs State of Jharkhand and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 21, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972782

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dr Vinod Kumar

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and ors

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi cont.case(civil)no.1175of2012 dr.vinodkumar . petitioner versus thestateofjharkhand&ors. .... oppositeparties coram: honblemr.justiced.n.patel forthepetitioner :mr.rajanraj,advocate forthestate :j.c.tog.p.ii foroppositepartynos.2&3 :mr.pramodkumarchoudhary,advocate foroppositepartyno.4 :mr.rajeshshankar,advocate 05/dated:21 st june,2013 1. learned counsel for the university submitted that they have already writtenalettertothejharkhandpublicservicecommissionandthejharkhand publicservicecommissionhasalsogivenreplytotheuniversitybyletterdated 18thjune,2013thattheuniversityhadsentincompletepapersand,thereafter, noreplyhasbeengivenbythesidhukanhuuniversity.2. learnedcounselforoppositepartynos.2and3isseekingtimetogive reply to the jharkhand public service commission of their letter dated 18thjune,2013.3. thematteris,therefore,adjournedtobelistedon28thjune,2013. (d.n.patel,j.) ajay

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cont.Case(Civil)No.1175of2012 Dr.VinodKumar . Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&ors. .... OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner :Mr.RajanRaj,Advocate FortheState :J.C.toG.P.II ForOppositePartyNos.2&3 :Mr.PramodKumarChoudhary,Advocate ForOppositePartyNo.4 :Mr.RajeshShankar,Advocate 05/Dated:21 st June,2013 1. Learned counsel for the University submitted that they have already writtenalettertotheJharkhandPublicServiceCommissionandtheJharkhand PublicServiceCommissionhasalsogivenreplytotheUniversitybyletterdated 18thJune,2013thattheUniversityhadsentincompletepapersand,thereafter, noreplyhasbeengivenbytheSidhuKanhuUniversity.

2. Learnedcounselforoppositepartynos.2and3isseekingtimetogive reply to the Jharkhand Public Service Commission of their letter dated 18thJune,2013.

3. Thematteris,therefore,adjournedtobelistedon28thJune,2013. (D.N.Patel,J.) Ajay

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial