Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Satyendra Kumar Singh and ors Vs. Coal India Limited Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director and ors

Satyendra Kumar Singh and ors vs Coal India Limited Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 21, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972738

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Satyendra Kumar Singh and ors

Respondent

Coal India Limited Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director and ors

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(t) no. 3562 of 2013 satyendra kumar singh and others ...... petitioners vrs. coal india limited and others ...... respondents ------ coram: honble the chief justice honble mrs. justice jaya roy ------ for the petitioners : mr. sumeet gadodia, adv. for the respondents: mr. m. khan, asgi order no.2 dated 21st june, 2013. defects pointed out by the office are ignored. admit. list along with w.p.(t) no. 3087 of 2013 and connected matters. meanwhile, operation of the communication dated 07.5.2013 and consequently recovery of the amount from the writ petitioners is hereby stayed. it is made clear that in case petitioners fail in the writ petition then they shall have to pay interest amount if it is required to be paid to the concerned taxing authority. (prakash tatia,c.j.) (jaya roy, j.) sudhir

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 3562 of 2013 Satyendra Kumar Singh and others ...... Petitioners Vrs. Coal India Limited and others ...... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Adv. For the Respondents: Mr. M. Khan, ASGI Order No.2 Dated 21st June, 2013. Defects pointed out by the office are ignored. Admit. List along with W.P.(T) No. 3087 of 2013 and connected matters. Meanwhile, operation of the communication dated 07.5.2013 and consequently recovery of the amount from the writ petitioners is hereby stayed. It is made clear that in case petitioners fail in the writ petition then they shall have to pay interest amount if it is required to be paid to the concerned taxing authority. (Prakash Tatia,C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) Sudhir

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial