Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 55 of about 750 results (0.021 seconds)Raja Khanna & Ors vs.ashvani Kumar Singh
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:05. h February, 2019 Pronounced on:08. h February, 2019 + RC.REV. 524/2016 & CM APPL Nos.40818/2016, 27799/2018 RAJA KHANNA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through : Mr.Rajiv Mehra, Advocate. versus ASHVANI KUMAR SINGH ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Vivek Sood, Sr Advocate with Mr.Akhil Mittal, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This revision challenges the impugned order dated 05.07.2016 passed by the learned Additional Rent Controller-02 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (hereinafter Trial Court) in Eviction Petition E- 797324/2016 titled Sh.Ashvani Kumar Singh Vs Sh.Raja Khanna & Ors filed by the landlord/respondent herein against the tenants/petitioners under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (DRC Act).2. The learned Trial Court vide impugned order dismissed the application for leave to defend filed by the petitioners and passed an eviction order in respect of premises i...
Tag this Judgment!John Snow India Private Limited & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 08, 2019 CRL.M.C. 3308/2018 & CRL.M.A. 11997/2018 & 144/2019 JOHN SNOW INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS......Petitioners Through: Mr.Vijay Pal Dalmia, Mr. Rajat Jain and Mr. Aditya Dhar, Advocates Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor with SI Ranveer Singh Ms. Vidya K. Sagar and Mr. Ajit Kumar Jha, Advocates with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Initially, quashing of FIR No.100/2018, under Sections 406/420/506/34/120B of IPC registered at Police Station Safdarjung Enclave, South Delhi, Delhi was sought on merits. But, now a joint application has been filed by petitioner and respondent No.2/complainant to seek the quashing of FIR as the dispute between the parties, which are essentially of civil nature, is said to have been mutually settled by them. CRL. M.C. 3308/2018 Page 1 of 5 Alongwith this application, affidavit of 11th...
Tag this Judgment!S R vs.s R
Court: Delhi
$~10 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Judgment:08. 02.2019 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 27/2017 & CM APPLs 51991-92/2018 S R S R ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Manisha Arora, Advocate Versus ..... Respondent Through Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate alongwith respondent in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.(ORAL) The appellant/husband is aggrieved by the order dated 02.01.2017 1. passed by the Family Court on an application filed by the respondent/wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as HMA by which interim maintenance of Rs. 25,000/- per month has been awarded to the respondent/wife from the date of aforesaid application except for the period during which the respondent/wife remain employed i.e. between June, 2012 to November, 2012 and also for the period April, 2016 to November, 2016. The litigation expenses to the tune of Rs. 11,000/- were also awarded to the respondent/wife. MAT. APP. (F....
Tag this Judgment!Babu Lal & Ors vs.general Manager, Northern Railway
Court: Delhi
$~R-5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment Pronounced on:08. 02.2019 Judgment Reserved on:23.01.2019 W.P. (C) 9001/2006, 12690/2006, 12691/2006 BABU LAL & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajiv Agarwal, Advocate. versus GENERAL MANAGER, NORTHERN RAILWAY ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Geetanjali Mohan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.1. The present writ petition has been filed assailing the award dated 01.06.2005 passed by the learned Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court No.II in ID No.31/2000 whereby the learned Labour Court answered the reference against the petitioners/workmen and has held that they are not entitled for a temporary status under the Northern Railway as they were engaged as casual workers by the Northern Railway Sports Association (hereinafter referred to as NRSA) for working at Railways Karnail Singh Stadium. W.P.(C ) No.9001/2006 Page 1 of 8 2. The petitioner no.1 was engaged as a peon on 01.05.1990 at initial salar...
Tag this Judgment!Ved Prakash Gupta & Sons (Huf) vs.prem Lata
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h February, 2019. CS(OS) 99/2018 & IA No.3229/2018 (u/O XXXIX R-1&2 CPC) VED PRAKASH GUPTA & SONS (HUF) Through: Seema Tiwari, Adv. ..... Plaintiff Versus PREM LATA Through: Mr. Sanjay Sehgal & Mr. Tarun ..... Defendant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW Narang, Advs.1. On 29th January, 2019, the following order was passed in the suit: 1. None appears for the defendant.2.3. The suit is ripe for framing of issues. The pleadings have been perused. the plaintiffs have instituted this suit for (i) recovery of 4. possession of semi-built up property bearing No.11, ad- measuring 325 sq. mtrs. in Block and Pocket C-4, Sector-28, situated in the layout plan of Rohini Residential Scheme, Delhi and for recovery of mesne profits / damages for use and occupation thereof with effect from 15th September, 2017; (ii) mandatory injunction directing the defendant to clear all electricity and water charges with respect to the sa...
Tag this Judgment!Makemy Trip (India) Private Limited vs.m/s Make My Happy Journey
Court: Delhi
4 $~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 1211/2018& I.A.No.15013/2018 MAKEMY TRIP (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Plaintiff Through Mr. Mohit Goel, Mr. Sidhant Goel, Mr. Abhishek Kotnala, Ms. Malika Nandkloyer and Mr. Deepankar Mishra, Advocates. versus M/S MAKE MY HAPPY JOURNEY ..... Defendant Through None Date of Decision:08. h February, 2019 % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J: (Oral) 1. Present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademarks, copyrights, passing off, dilution of goodwill, unfair competition, rendition of accounts of profits, damages, delivery up etc. The prayer clause is reproduced hereinbelow:-"58. In the circumstances aforesaid, the Plaintiff most respectfully prays that this Honble Court may be pleased to pass: (a) Decree for permanent injunction restraining the Defendant, its partners, directors, shareholders or proprietor as the CS (COMM) 1211/2018 Page 1 of 11 case may be, its assigns i...
Tag this Judgment!Dheeraj Makkar & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 08, 2019 CRL.M.C. 715/2019 DHEERAJ MAKKAR & ORS. Through: Mr.Sachin Dev Sharma, Advocate .....Petitioners Versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A.2945/2019 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 715/2019 Quashing of FIR No.160/2017, under Sections 498A/4of IPC and under Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, registered at Police Station Anand Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 7th July, 2018 reached between the parties. Upon notice, Mr. M.S.Oberoi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by learned Additional Public Prosecutor on the basis of identity proof pr...
Tag this Judgment!Bhola Nath vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
$~14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:-"8th February, 2019 + CRL.A. 321/2002 BHOLA NATH Through: Mr. R.S. Mishra, Advocate with ..... Appellant versus Mr. Anand Mishra, Advocate along with appellant in person. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA State 1. ORDER (ORAL) The appellant Bhola Nath stood trial in sessions case No.77/2001 arising out of first information report (FIR) No.575/1994 of Police Station Sameypur Badli, involving offences punishable under Sectionsof the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) read with Section 25 of the Arms Act. He was the fifth accused (A5) in the said case, five other persons having been prosecuted along with him, they being Mahender Singh (A1), Shiv Kumar @ Shiva (A2), Jai Singh (A3), Maste (A4) and Kharwan @ Motu (A6).2. The trial concluded in judgment dated 05.04.2002 of the Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) holding the appellant and other co- accused pe...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Subhash Kumar Sharma vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:08. 02.2019 BAIL APPLN. 2838/2018 SHRI SUBHASH KUMAR SHARMA ........ Petitioner STATE versus ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Ms. June Chaudhary, Sr. Advocate with Mr. V. For the Respondent: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State. Elanchezhiyan and Mr. Manzar Anis, Advocates. Mr. Anupam S. Sharma with Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Mr. Prakash Aikan, Mr. Parikshith Sharma and Mr. Zubaik, Advocates for the complainant. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.48644/2018 (for condonation of delay in re-filing) For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The delay in re-filing the petition is condoned. BAIL APPLN. 2838/2018 & Crl.M.(Bail) 2009/2018 (for interim bail for 30 days)... Petitioner seeks regular bail in FIR No.495/2017 under Sections 1. BAIL APPLN. 2838/2018 Page 1 of 3 384/3IPC, Police Station Punjabi Bag...
Tag this Judgment!Food Corporation of India vs.itc Limited
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:08. h February, 2019 LPA2822017 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Om Prakash, Mr. R.R. Pathak and Mr. Pradeep Kumar Tripathi, Advs. versus ITC LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Arvind Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr. L.K. Bhushan and Ms. Aditi Awasthy, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. This Intra-Court appeal has been filed by the Food Corporation of India challenging the order dated December 22, 2016 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P. (C) 7145/2015 and an order dated August 16, 2017 in Review Petition No.64/2017 in W.P. (C) 7145/2015 as per amended memo of appeal at page 296 of the paper book.2. Vide the first order dated December 22, 2016, the learned Single Judge has directed the refund of `42,56,250/- within a period of four weeks, failing which the appellant was liable to pay simple LPA2822017 Page 1 of 8 interest at the rate...
Tag this Judgment!