Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 59 of about 750 results (0.020 seconds)Delhi Development Authority vs.subhash Chand Dhigan
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2019
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:7. h February, 2019 + LPA2732018 & CM. Nos. 20306/2018 and 20307/2018 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant ..... Respondent versus SUBHASH CHAND DHIGAN AND + versus LPA2742018 & CM. Nos. 20312/2018, 30313/2018 and 20315/2018 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant ..... Respondent LPA2752018 & CM. Nos. 20316/2018 and 20317/2018 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SUSHMA LAKRA @ SUSHMA SYLDIAC BARA AND + AND + NIRMALA versus ..... Appellant ..... Respondent LPA2762018 & CM. Nos. 20319/2018 and 20320/2018 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Appellant versus SURESH KUMAR ..... Respondent LPA No.273/2018 and connected matters. Page 1 of 9 LPA2772018 & CM. Nos. 20322/2018 and 20323/2018 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus SHASHI BALA PATHAK ..... Appellant ..... Respondent AND + AND + LPA2782018 & CM. Nos. 20328/2018 and 20329/2018 DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY versus GANDETI KRISHNA RAO ..... Appellant ..... Respondent AND + LPA279...
Tag this Judgment!Ex Ct/Cook Shishpal Singh vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2019
$~14 & 16 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7843/2015 Through: Mr. Pawan Kumar Sharma, Mr. Sarvesh Singh & Ms.Kanika Madan, Advocates OM PARKASH AND ANR. ........ Petitioners UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Anubha Bhardwaj & Mr. Jatin Teotia, Advocates for UOI. W.P.(C) 2510/2017 + EX CT/COOK SHISHPAL SINGH ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj & Ms. Priyanka M.Bhardwaj & Mr. M.D.Jangra, Advocates versus Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for Respondent No.1/UOI. Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC & Mr. Upendra Sai, Advocates for Respondent Nos.2 to 4 CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER0702.2019 W.P.(C) 7843/2015 & 2510/2017 Page 1 of 14 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These are two writ petitions arising from a similar set of facts and are accordingly being disposed of by this common judgment.2. The two... Petitioners in Writ Petition (C) No.7843/201...
Tag this Judgment!Sand Lal Aggarwal vs.anand Prakash Bansal Dharamvir & Co.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2019
* + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 07, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1480/2017 & Crl.M.A. 6091/2017 CRL.M.C. 3244/2017 & Crl.M.A. 13338/2017 CRL.M.C. 3246/2017 & Crl.M.A. 13342/2017 CRL.M.C. 3247/2017 & Crl.M.As. 13344/2017 & 8326/2018 CRL.M.C. 3248/2017 & Crl.M.A. 13346/2017 CRL.M.C. 3645/2017 & Crl.M.A. 14833/2017 SANT LAL AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. D.C. Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shubendru Bhardwaj, Mr. Aroma S. Bhardwaj, Mr. Inayat Ahamad and Mr. Rehman Ahmad, Advocates Versus ANAND PRAKASH BANSAL DHARAMVIR & CO. .....Respondents Through: Mr. B.S. Mathur, Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, Mr. Rajat Mathur, Ms. Aditee Mathur and Mr. Divyank Tyagi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned petitions, quashing of six complaints under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and summoning order of 21st March, 2017 is sought on merits. Above captioned first petition pertains to dishonouring of two cheques o...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Kular Construction Ltd. Vs.gurnam Singh
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2019
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :25. h October, 2018 Date of decision :7th February, 2019 M/S KULAR CONSTRUCTION LTD. CS (OS) 1932/2014 & I.A. 11236/2016 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Girish Aggarwal, Advocate. (M:9810400291) versus GURNAM SINGH ..... Defendant Through: Mr. Ashok Mathur, Advocate. (M:9810018800) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.JUDGMENT1 The present case is a classic example of how litigation can be protracted by parties, only with a view to avoid payment of court fee. A case which ought to have been a simple suit for recovery has been designed as a declaratory suit leading to framing of a preliminary issue which is being decided by the present order. The preliminary issue framed in the suit is: Issue no.2 - Whether the present suit for declaration in respect of a recovery claim is maintainable in law?. 2. The reliefs prayed for in the suit are as under: a) That the Decree of Declaration may kindly be passed in favour of t...
Tag this Judgment!Updesh Kumar & Ors. Vs.the State & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 07, 2019 CRL.M.C. 691/2019 & Crl.M.A. 2834/2019 UPDESH KUMAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. G.S. Gangwar, Advocate Versus THE STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor, for respondent No.1-State Mr. Manoj Kumar Pathak, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR Quashing of ORDER (ORAL) FIR No.1171/2015, under Sections 498A/406/506/509/3of IPC, registered at police station Punjabi Bagh, Delhi is sought on the basis of Settlement of 31st October, 2017 (Annexure P-2) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the par...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Shree Rajmoti Industries vs.m/s Rajmoti Foods Products
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2019
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:7. h February, 2019 + CS (COMM) 335/2018 & I.A.10666/2014 M/S SHREE RAJMOTI INDUSTRIES ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman, Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Mr. Kapil Kumar Giri and Mr. Vinay Kumar Shukla, Advocates.(M:9990389539) versus M/S RAJMOTI FOODS PRODUCTS Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH ..... Defendant Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. Plaintiff - M/s Shree Rajmoti Industries has filed the present suit seeking permanent injunction restraining infringement of trademark, passing off, delivery up, etc.2. Plaintiff avers that it adopted the mark RAJMOTI in the year 1962 as a trademark, trade name and a prominent part of its trading style. The mark RAJMOTI is registered both as a word mark and as a label mark in various classes including classes 29, 31, 32, 35 & 42. The Plaintiff is primarily using the mark RAJMOTI in respect of edible oil. The products of the Plaintiff are also advertised and publicised throu...
Tag this Judgment!Jasvinder Singh vs.state (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 07, 2019 CRL.M.C. 52/2017 JASVINDER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Davinder Hora and Mr. Sikandar Khan, Advocates with petitioner and Gurpreet Kaur in person. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State with SI Mahendra Kumar Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate with son of respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.C. 52/2017 Quashing of FIR No.164/2013, under Sections 323/341/506 of IPC registered at police station Kirti Nagar is sought on the basis of Mediated Settlement of 6th April, 2016 which is a composite settlement relating to the FIR in question, FIR No.163/13, under Sections 323/354A/506/5of IPC, registered at Police Station Kirti Nagar and FIR No.381/2013 under Sections 498A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Tilak Nagar. CRL.M.C. 52/2017 Page 1 of 2 Learned counsel for the parties submits that pet...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Kisna & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 07, 2019 CRL.M.C. 695/2019 SHRI KISHNA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhishek Kaushik & Ms. Neha Sharma, Advocates Versus STATE & Ors. Through: Mr. ........ RESPONDENTS Izhar Ahmed, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1-State with ASI Rajindera & HC Anil Kumar Mr. Pandey, Advocate with respondent No 3 in person. Sushil Kumar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M.A. 2853/2019 For the reasons stated in the application, delay of 30 days in re- filing the accompanying petition is condoned. Application is disposed of. Crl.M.A. 2851/2019 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 695/2019 & Crl.M.A. 2852/2019 Quashing of FIR No.3/2018, under Sections 323/3of IPC, CRL.M.C. 695/2019 Page 1 of 4 registered at police station Bhalswa Dairy, Delhi is sought on the ground that the misunderstanding which led to registration of the FIR in question now stands cleared between the parties. ...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Pramod Kumar Yadav vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2019
$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:07. 02.2019 CRL.REV.P. 1134/2018 & Crl. M. (Bail) 1929/2018 SH. PRAMOD KUMAR YADAV STATE & ANR. versus ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : : Mr. Amar Nath Saini and Mr. Naman Gambheer, Advs. Mr. Hirein Sharma, Addl. PP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA % ORDER0702.2019 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner impugns judgment dated 16.05.2018 of the appellate court whereby the appeal of the petitioner impugning judgment on conviction dated 25.07.2017 and order on sentence dated 27.07.2017 was dismissed.2.... Petitioner has been convicted of offence under sections 279/338/304-A IPC of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.3.... Petitioner has been sentenced to undergo Rigorous CRL.REV.P11342018 Page 1 of 5 Imprisonment for a period of six months along with fine of Rs. 1,000/- for the offences punishable under Secti...
Tag this Judgment!Ushakant Buildwell (P) Limited. Vs.m/s. Chinar Shipping and Infrastruc ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2019
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CC No.101 /2018 CS(OS)1745/2015 #14 USHAKANT BUILDWELL (P) LIMITED. Through: None ..... Plaintiff versus M/S. CHINAR SHIPPING AND INFRASTRUCTURE (INDIA) P LTD & ANR. Through Mr. Neeraj Jain, Advocate for ..... Defendants D-1/Counter Claimant. Date of Decision:07. h February, 2019 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, J (Oral) 1. Present counter claim has been filed in CS (OS) No.1745/2015, by the defendant no.1 against the plaintiff, for recovery of Rs.1,62,13,857/- . The prayer clause in the counter-claim is reproduced herein 2. below:-"a. b. c. a decree in the sum of Rs. 1,62,13,857/- may kindly be passed in favour of Defendant No.1 and against the Plaintiff. Interest @ 18% per annum pendentelite and future till the date of payment may be passed in favour of Defendant No.1 and against the Plaintiff. A preliminary decree for accounts be passed in favour of Defendant No.1 and against the Plaintiff CS (OS) 1745/2015 Page ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- Next ›
- Last »