Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2019 Page 50 of about 750 results (0.024 seconds)Govind Raj vs.the State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 710/2003 Reserved on:16. 01.2019 Date of decision:12. 02.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: GOVIND RAJ Through: Ms. Rakhi Dubey, Advocate ..... Appellant THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, APP for State CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI HIMA KOHLI, J.1. The appellant is aggrieved by the judgment dated 31.05.2003 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge in Session Case No.1/2000 arising out of FIR No.13/2000 registered against him at Police Station: Sriniwas Puri under Section 302 IPC, whereunder the trial court has convicted him for the murder of his wife, Walli under Section 302 IPC and vide order on sentence passed on the same date, he was sentenced to imprisonment for life under Section 302 IPC and pay a fine of Rs.2,000/-. In default of payment of fine, the appellant has been directed to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for two months.2. The facts of th...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Mangal Singh & Ors. Vs.state & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 12, 2019 CRL.M.C. 5260/2018 and Crl.M.A.34232/2018 SH. MANGAL SINGH & ORS. Through: Mr.Gaurav Deep Gupta, ........ Petitioners + Advocates. Versus STATE & ORS. Through: Mr.Izhar Ahmad, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS with SI Jasmer Singh, PS Jahangir Puri. Respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.685 of 2007 under Sections 498A/4of IPC registered at Police Station Jahangir Puri, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of respondent No.2 of 20th April, 2018. Upon notice, Mr. Izhar Ahmad, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by SI Jasmer Singh, on the basis of identity proof produced by him. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that divorce has been granted and the dispute between the parties...
Tag this Judgment!Reliance Communications Ltd vs.atc Telecom Infrastructure Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~4 & 5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 12, 2019 + + EFA(OS) (COMM) 4/2019 RELIANCE COMMUNICATIONS LTD ..... Appellant versus ATC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD ..... Respondent EFA(OS) (COMM) 5/2019 RELIANCE TELECOM LTD ..... Appellant versus ATC TELECOM INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD Counsel for the Appellant: ..... Respondent Mr. Amit Sibal, Senior Advocate with Mr. Saket Singh, Mr. Sayarce Basu Mallik, Ms. Madhavi Agrawal, Advocates Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajit Warier, Mr. Angad Kochhar, Mr. Varun Byreddy, Advocates. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN % S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(ORAL) ORDER1 These appeals question the orders made in the course of enforcement proceedings taken out by the respondent/decree holder ATC Telecom Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. EFA (OS)(Comm) No.4 & 5/2019 Page 1 of 8 2. At the outset, this court notices that the appeal is not maintainable given the p...
Tag this Judgment!Tanaka Ram and Ors. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:23. d January, 2019 Decided on:12. h February, 2019 + W.P.(C) 6680/2017 ........ Petitioners Through: Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Advocate. TANAKA RAM AND ORS. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchi Jain, Advocate for R/UOI. + W.P.(C) 10189/2016 HC/RO RAVIKANT CHAUDHARY & ORS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus Through: Ms. Garima Sachdeva, Advocate. ........ Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Mr. Nikhil Bhardwaj and Mr. Shashwat Sharma, Advocates for R-UOI. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. 151 Constables of the Border Security Force (BSF) [(53 in W.P. (C) 6680 of 2017 and 98 in W.P. (C) 10189 of 2017]. have come together to file the present petitions seeking a writ of mandamus to the... RESPONDENTS to extend WP(C) 6680/2017 & 10189/2016 Page 1 of 11 to them the benefit of the Old Pension Scheme in accordance with the CCS (Pension) R...
Tag this Judgment!s.s.sidhu vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h January, 2019 Decided on:12. h February, 2019 + LPA3222018 & CM No.24261/2018 (stay) NARINDER PAUL KAUSHIK .... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with + LPA3452018 Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. HARENDRA MOHAN VYAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with + LPA3932018 Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. SUBHASH GUPTA Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with LPA No.322/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 17 + Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. LPA3972018 DR. VIKRAM KUMAR DABAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advoc...
Tag this Judgment!Kirpal Kohli vs.khairati Lal
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on:06. h February, 2019 Pronounced on:12. h February, 2019 + RC.REV. 444/2018 & CM APPL No.37708/2018 KIRPAL KOHLI ........ Petitioner KHAIRATI LAL ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Sharvan Dev, Advocate with Through : Mr.J.S.Vohra, Advocate. versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA respondent. YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This revision challenges the impugned order dated 10.07.2018 passed by the learned Additional Rent Controller -02 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi (hereinafter Trial Court) in Eviction Petition E- 110/2016 (New No.110/2016) titled Khairati Lal vs Kirpal Chand Kohli filed by the landlord/respondent herein against the tenant/petitioner under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (DRC Act).2. The learned Trial Court vide impugned order dismissed the application for leave to defend filed by the petitioner and passed an eviction order in respect of one shop bearing No.171, Subzi Mandi, Main Road, Delhi ...
Tag this Judgment!Lucky Arora @Rajat Arora vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 12, 2019 CRL.M.C. 775/2019 LUCKY ARORA @RAJAT ARORA Through: Mr.Nikhil Mehta, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. M.P. Singh, Additional Public .....Respondents Prosecutor for State Mr.Vikas Sood, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Crl.M. A. No.3154/2019 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 775/2019 Quashing of FIR No.400/2016, under Section 279 of IPC registered at police station Anand Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of second respondents affidavit of 29th January, 2019. Upon notice, Mr. M.P. Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and he has been identified to be so, by learned Additional Public Prosecutor on the basis Crl.M.C No.775/2019 Page 1 of 4 of identity proof produced by him. Respon...
Tag this Judgment!Naina Bakshi vs.government of Nct of Delhi & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29. h January, 2019 Decided on:12. h February, 2019 + LPA3222018 & CM No.24261/2018 (stay) NARINDER PAUL KAUSHIK .... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with + LPA3452018 Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. HARENDRA MOHAN VYAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with + LPA3932018 Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. SUBHASH GUPTA Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advocate with ..... Appellant Mr. A.P. Singh, Advocate. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Ruchira Gupta, Advocate with LPA No.322/2018 & other connected matters Page 1 of 17 + Ms. Mona Sinha, Advocate. LPA3972018 DR. VIKRAM KUMAR DABAS ..... Appellant Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Advoc...
Tag this Judgment!South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.m/s Tech Mahindra
Court: Delhi
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: February 12, 2019 + EFA(OS) (COMM) 3/2019 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Poddar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Bajaj, Mr.Aakanksha Nehra, Mr. Govind Kumar, Mr. Soayib Qureshi and Mr.Naman Tandon, Advocates versus M/S TECH MAHINDRA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr. Abhijeet Sinha, Ms. Rashmi Gogoi, Ms. Surabhi Limaye, Ms. Sayaree Basu Malik, Mr. Sidharth Naidu & Ms. Vaishali Kalera, Advocate CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN % S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) 1. The South Delhi Municipal Corporation (hereafter SDMC) appeals an order of the learned Single Judge which directed it to deposit 50% of the awarded amount; even whilst directing the final hearing of its petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. It is also contended that this direction could not have been made when the application p...
Tag this Judgment!Bch Electric Limited vs.pradeep Mehra
Court: Delhi
$~ * 89 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA972019 & CM65342019 (stay) + BCH ELECTRIC LIMITED ..... Appellant Through: Mr Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Mr Gulshan Chawla, Advocate. versus PRADEEP MEHRA ..... Respondent Through: Mr Saurabh Prakash and Mr Kunal Jain, Gosain with Mr Utsav Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER1202.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 6th February, 2019 of the learned Single Judge dismissing the Appellants writ petition being W.P.(C) No.3385/2018 thereby affirming an order dated 23rd March, 2018 passed by the Appellate Authority (AA) under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 (PGA). By the said order dated 23rd March, 2018, the AA had dismissed the appeal of the Appellant, thereby upholding an order dated 31st July, 2017 passed by the Controlling Authority (CA) granting the Respondent Rs.1,73,75,000/- as balance gratuity along with simple interest @ 10 percent per annum f...
Tag this Judgment!