Delhi Court February 2019 Judgments
Sant Lal Aggarwal vs.anand Prakash Bansal Dharamvir & Co
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2019
* + + + + + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 07, 2019 CRL.M.C. 1480/2017 & Crl.M.A. 6091/2017 CRL.M.C. 3244/2017 & Crl.M.A. 13338/2017 CRL.M.C. 3246/2017 & Crl.M.A. 13342/2017 CRL.M.C. 3247/2017 & Crl.M.As. 13344/2017 & 8326/2018 CRL.M.C. 3248/2017 & Crl.M.A. 13346/2017 CRL.M.C. 3645/2017 & Crl.M.A. 14833/2017 SANT LAL AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. D.C. Mathur, Senior Advocate with Mr. Shubendru Bhardwaj, Mr. Aroma S. Bhardwaj, Mr. Inayat Ahamad and Mr. Rehman Ahmad, Advocates Versus ANAND PRAKASH BANSAL DHARAMVIR & CO. .....Respondents Through: Mr. B.S. Mathur, Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, Mr. Rajat Mathur, Ms. Aditee Mathur and Mr. Divyank Tyagi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) In the above captioned petitions, quashing of six complaints under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and summoning order of 21st March, 2017 is sought on merits. Above captioned first petition pertains to dishonouring of two cheques o...
Tag this Judgment!Ramesh Chand Shukla vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 07, 2019 CRL.M.C. 692/2019 & CRL. M.A. 2835/2019 RAMESH CHAND SHUKLA Through: Mr. Baldev Singh, Advocate ........ Petitioner Versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.S. Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State with Inspector Avnish Tyagi Mr. Basant Kumar Singh, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of FIR No.681/2018, under Sections 323/342/354/354B of IPC, registered at police station Shahbad Dairy, Delhi is sought on the basis of affidavit of 16th January, 2019 of respondent No.2. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court, is complainant/first-informant of the FIR in question and she has been identified to be so, by Inspector Avnish Tyagi on the basis of identity proof produced by her. Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the CRL. ...
Tag this Judgment!Miss Vinod Khanna and Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~1. * + % W.P.(C.) No.8206/2018 MISS VINOD KHANNA AND ANR. Date of Decision:07.02.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Jaswinder Kaur, Adv. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mrs. Suparna Srivastava, CGSC with Mr. Tushar Mathur, Advs. for R-1 to R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL VIPIN SANGHI, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners have preferred the present writ petition to assail the order dated 06.09.2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, (the Tribunal) in O.A. No.2782/2016. The Tribunal has rejected the said Original Application preferred by the petitioners wherein the primary dispute raised by them was with regard to their re-designation as, and the fixation of their pay scales as, Data Entry W.P.(C.) No.8206/2018 Page 1 of 6 Operators (DEO) Grade B with effect from 01.01.1986 in terms of O.M. dated 11.09.1989.2. We may observe that the petitioners ...
Tag this Judgment!Om Parkash and Anr. Vs.union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2019
$~14 & 16 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7843/2015 Through: Mr. Pawan Kumar Sharma, Mr. Sarvesh Singh & Ms.Kanika Madan, Advocates OM PARKASH AND ANR. ........ Petitioners UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Anubha Bhardwaj & Mr. Jatin Teotia, Advocates for UOI. W.P.(C) 2510/2017 + EX CT/COOK SHISHPAL SINGH ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.M.K.Bhardwaj & Ms. Priyanka M.Bhardwaj & Mr. M.D.Jangra, Advocates versus Through: Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for Respondent No.1/UOI. Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC & Mr. Upendra Sai, Advocates for Respondent Nos.2 to 4 CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA % ORDER0702.2019 W.P.(C) 7843/2015 & 2510/2017 Page 1 of 14 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. These are two writ petitions arising from a similar set of facts and are accordingly being disposed of by this common judgment.2. The two... Petitioners in Writ Petition (C) No.7843/201...
Tag this Judgment!Sunil Kumar @ Sonu vs.state (Govt. Of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 07, 2019 CRL.M.C. 704/2019 & Crl.M.A. 2887/2019 SUNIL KUMAR @ SONU ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikash Kumar, Mr. Rohit Singh & Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocates Versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. M.S.Oberoi, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) Quashing of F.I.R. No.13/2019, under Sectionsof IPC, registered at Police Station Raj Park, Delhi is sought in this petition on the basis of affidavit of 11th January, 2019 of second respondent, who is the complainant of FIR in question. Supreme Court in Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC641has reiterated the parameters for exercising inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR / criminal complaint, which are as under:-"16.6. In the exercise of the power under Section 482 and while dealing with a plea that the dispute ...
Tag this Judgment!Deepak Sharma & Ors. Vs.state & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-07-2019
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: February 07, 2019 CRL.M.C. 6337/2018 DEEPAK SHARMA & ORS. Through: Mr. M.B. Harikant, Advocate .....Petitioners versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Additional .....Respondents Public Prosecutor for respondent- State Mr. Vijay Yadav, Advocate with respondent No.2 present in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER (ORAL) CRL.M.A.49609/2018 (Exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 6337/2018 Quashing of FIR No.138/2015, under Sections 498-A/4of IPC, registered at Police Station Vijay Vihar, Delhi is sought on the basis of Memorandum of Understanding of 15th September, 2017 (Annexure-C) reached between the parties. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State submits that respondent No.2, present in the Court is the complainant/first informant of FIR in question and she has been identified CRL.M.C. 6337/2018 Page 1 of 4 to be so, by her counsel on the basis of ident...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Lakshmi Energy & Food Ltd vs.reserve Bank of India & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2019
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: November 30, 2018 Judgment delivered on: February 06, 2019 + LPA5792018 M/S LAKSHMI ENERGY & FOOD LTD Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. and ..... Appellant Mr. Vivek K. Tankha, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Amitabh Chaturvedi, Mr. Vivek Chib, Mr. Prashant Sivarajan, Mr. Himesh Thakur & Mr. Kaushal Sharma, Advs. versus RESERVE BANK OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. H.S. Parihar with Mr. K.S. Parihar, Advs. for R-1/RBI. Mr. Rajesh Kr. Gautam with Mr. Aakash Sehrawat, Advs. for R-2/PNB. Mr. Ramji Srinivasan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Diwakar Maheshwari, Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh & Ms. Syloma Mohapatra, Advs. for R-3/ICICI Bank. Mr. Sumit Nagpal, Adv. for R- 4/Axis Bank. Mr. Rama Subba Raju, Adv. for R-5/Syndicate Bank. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT LPA5792018 Page 1 of 92 V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 Present appeal has been filed challenging the judgment dated 24th September, 2018 passed by the lea...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Bch Electric Limited vs.pradeep Mehra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2019
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3385/2018 Reserved on:22. 01.2019 Date of decision:06. 02.2019 M/S BCH ELECTRIC LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv with Mr.Gulshan Chawla, Adv. versus PRADEEP MEHRA ..... Respondent Through: Mr.J.P.Cama, Sr.Adv with Mr.Kunal Gosain, Mr.Utsav Jain, Advs. + W.P.(C) 3485/2018 M/S BCH ELECTRIC LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv with Mr.Gulshan Chawla, Adv. versus + W.P.(C) 3498/2018 SUPRIO MUKHARJEE ..... Respondent Through Mr.Saurabh Prakash, Adv. M/S BCH ELECTRIC LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv with Mr.Gulshan Chawla, Adv. versus SHAILENDRA GUPTA ..... Respondent Through Mr.Saurabh Prakash, Adv. W.P.(C) Nos.3385/2018 & conn.matters Page 1 of 27 + W.P.(C) 3508/2018 M/S BCH ELECTRIC LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Sandeep Sethi, Sr.Adv with Mr.Gulshan Chawla, Adv. versus DIBYENDU BHATTACHARJEE Through Mr.Saurabh Prakash, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM...
Tag this Judgment!Imran Ali Khan vs.central Board of Secondary Education & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2019
$~29 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision :06. 02.2019 LPA1282017 IMRAN ALI KHAN Through Mr. M. Rais Farooqui, Adv. ..... Appellant versus CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA A.K. CHAWLA, J.(ORAL) 1. This Letters Patent Appeal has come to be preferred assailing the order dated 15.12.2016 passed by the ld. Single Judge, whereby, WP(C) No.6996/2016 preferred by the petitioner, in effect, seeking correction of the mother's name of his daughter Ms. Filza Khan, appearing in the records of the respondents as "Kiran Khan" to "Fakiha Khan", and the consequent issuance of the fresh grade sheet-cum-certificate of performance of Secondary School Examination (Session 2013-2015), was dismissed. Concisely, the relevant facts are that at the time of admission of Ms.2. Filza Khan with the respondent No.2 school, the name of her mother wa...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Rakesh Brothers vs.areva T & D India Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-06-2019
$~13 & 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:6. h February, 2019 + O.M.P. (COMM) 139/2017 + M/S RAKESH BROTHERS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Avinash Trivedi, Advocate. versus AREVA T & D INDIA LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kaustubh Sinha and Ms. Surbhi Mehta, Advocates. (M:9891068254) AND O.M.P. (COMM) 140/2017 ALSTOM T & D INDIA LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Kaustubh Sinha and Ms. Surbhi Mehta, Advocates. versus Through: Mr. Avinash Trivedi, Advocate. ........ RESPONDENTS M/S RAKESH BROTHERS CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present two OMPs have been filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the Act) challenging the award dated 28th July, 2014 passed by the Ld. Sole Arbitrator.2. The background of the case is that M/s. Rakesh Brothers (hereinafter Contractor) was engaged as the Contractor for executing civil and building work at the IGI Airport, New Delhi by M/s. Areva T...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- Next ›
- Last »