Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 34 of about 590 results (0.019 seconds)Satish Builders vs.govt. Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:17. 10.2017 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 427/2017 SATISH BUILDERS ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent versus GOVT. NCT OF DELHI Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner . For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Mr Anuj Aggarwal and Ms Niti Jain, Advocates with Mr Vijay Kumar Gupta, Executive Engineer, PWD. : Mr Sunil Kumar Mittal, Mr Anshul Mittal, Mr Sushant Bali and Mr Harshit Vashisht, Advocates. JUDGMENT1710.2017 IA No.11988/ 2017(exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 427/2017 1. By this petition, under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, the petitioner seeks appointment of a Local Commissioner for carrying out the work of Joint Measurement and alternatively, a direction to the respondent to carry out a joint measurement of the work executed at site and also to inventorise the unused goods, tools and machinery lying at the site. ...
Tag this Judgment!G K Nanda vs.telecommunications Consultants India Ltd & Anr
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: October 16, 2017 Judgment reserved on: September 25, 2017 + W.P.(C) 6234/2017, CM No.25877/2017 G K NANDA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Harsh K. Sharma, Ms. Ragini, Ms. Vaibhavi Sharma & Mr. Rohit Gaur, Advs. versus TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTANTS INDIA LTD & ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ratan K. Singh, Mr. Gaurav Lavania & Ms. Sushila, Advs. for R1 Ms. Shubhra Parashar, Adv. for R2/UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO JUDGMENT V. KAMESWAR RAO, J1 The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-"In view of the facts and circumstances mentioned herein above, it is respectfully prayed that this Honble Court may kindly direct or issue a writ of appropriate nature, thereby quashing the Officer Order No.TCIL/11/802/01/17/ADMN, dt. 07.07.2017 passed by the respondent and thereafter direct the respondent to allow the petitioner to retain the Office Accommodation for a period of 8 m...
Tag this Judgment!Welldone Estate Projects Private Ltd vs.today Homes and Infrastructure ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON : AUGUST29 2017 DECIDED ON : OCTOBER16 2017 + CS(OS) 2601/2008 WELLDONE ESTATE PROJECTS PRIVATE LTD ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.Vivek Kohli with Ms.Prerna Kohli, Ms.Anubha Singh and Ms.Aishwarya Kaushiq, Advocates. versus TODAY HOMES AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LTD. AND OTHERS ..... Defendants Through : Mr.Vivek Sibal with Mr.Jitender Ratta, Advocates for D-1 & 2. Mr.Sahil Sagar, Sr.Advocate, with Mr.S.Sagar, Advocates, for D-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P GARG, J.1. The present suit has been filed by Welldone Estate projects Private Limited (hereinafter the plaintiff) against Today Homes and Infrastructure Private Limited (hereinafter defendant No.1), G.K.Gambhir (hereinafter defendant No.2), Rajesh Arora (hereinafter defendant No.3) and Ludhiana Improvement Trust (hereinafter defendant No.4) for recovery of `7,95,69,000/-. CS(OS) 2601/2008 Page 1 of 15 2. Briefly stated the facts as reflected in the plaint are that ...
Tag this Judgment!Nitin Sharma vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
$~26 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % W.P.(C)No.7952/2017 NITIN SHARMA Date of decision :16. h October, 2017 ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Abhishek Choudhary, Ms. Kirti Wardhan Sharma and Mr. Mohit Ramani, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Ms. Mohita, Adv. for UOI. Mr. Sharat Kapoor, Adv. for R- 2,3,4,6 & 7 with S.I. Sushil Sarwaria. Mr. Jaideep Malik, ASC for SDMC/R-5. Mr. Kumar Rajesh Singh, Adv. for R-8. CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) GITA MITTAL, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE1 This writ petition complains that a temple in Defence Colony, New Delhi which was in existence for the past 25 years was demolished by the police.2. A status report dated 4th September, 2017 has been filed under the signatures of Inspector Vijay Kumar informing that a small W.P.(C)No.7952/2017 Page 1 of 3 temporary structure adjacent to the bus stop Nehru Homeopathic, Defence Colony, Bhism Pitah...
Tag this Judgment!National Insurance Co Ltd vs.pompy Dutta & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on :16. h October, 2017 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO LTD Through: Mr.L.K.Tyagi, Adv. ..... Appellant + MAC.APP. 796/2016 POMPY DUTTA & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.R.K.Bachchan, Adv. for R-1 and R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The accident claim case MAC No.172/2016 was instituted by the first and second respondent (claimants) under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, inter alia, against the appellant insurance company seeking compensation on account of death of Barun Datta on 22.01.2011 allegedly due to the injuries which he had suffered in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 06.07.2010 involving negligent driving of car bearing registration No.DL3M-5139, a vehicle owned by the third respondent who is described also as the driver.2. The Tribunal by judgment dated 01.07.2016 upheld the contentions that the death had occurred due to the injuries suffered in the said accident rejecting ...
Tag this Judgment!Bank of India vs.hotel Kashish International and Ors
Court: Delhi
$~3. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7897/2016 and CM APPL. 32692/2016 1. BANK OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Advocate with Mr. Alok Kumar, Advocate versus HOTEL KASHISH INTERNATIONAL AND ORS........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Praveen Chauhan, Advocate with Mr. Akash Raj, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HONBLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. CHAWLA % The petitioner/Bank is aggrieved by an order dated 31.03.2016 passed ORDER1610.2017 by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) in Miscellaneous Appeal No.66/2016, filed by the respondent assailing an order dated 10.06.2014 passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal-I (DRT-I) whereby an ex parte order dated 11.02.2013 passed earlier, was set aside, subject to the respondent paying 50% of the amount due to the bank.2. In the impugned order, the learned DRAT had observed that the direction issued to the respondent to deposit 50% of the amount due to the petitioner/Bank was too harsh and accordingly...
Tag this Judgment!Masyc Projects Private Limited vs.jaiprakash Associates Limited
Court: Delhi
$~-1 to 12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:16. 10.2017 ARB. A. (COMM.) 29/2017 MASYC PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LIMITED versus ..... Respondent + ARB. A. (COMM.) 30/2017 MASYC PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LIMITED versus ..... Respondent + ARB. A. (COMM.) 31/2017 MASYC PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LIMITED versus ..... Respondent + ARB. A. (COMM.) 32/2017 MASYC PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LIMITED versus ..... Respondent + ARB. A. (COMM.) 33/2017 MASYC PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner ARB. A. (Comm). No.29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35,36,37,38,39 & 40 /2017 Page 1 of 18 versus JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LIMITED + ARB. A. (COMM.) 34/2017 ..... Respondent MASYC PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner versus JAIPRAKASH ASSOCIATES LIMITED ..... Respondent + ARB. A. (COMM.) 35/2017 MASYC PROJECTS PR...
Tag this Judgment!Asha Sethi vs.union of India & Anr
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:16. 10.2017 + LPA6632017 & CM No.36993/2017 (stay) VIJAY LAXMI BAHL versus ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Ms. Surjeet Kaur (Ministry) for R-1. And connected matter: + LPA6652017 & CM No.37003/2017 (stay) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (ORAL) % The appeals are allowed. For detailed judgment, the decision dated 16.10.2017 in LPA No.663/2017 may be referred to. OCTOBER16 2017 kks S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J SUNIL GAUR, J...
Tag this Judgment!Sh. Giriraj Ratan Daga & Ors vs.ganga Yamuna Finvest Private Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:09. h October, 2017 Pronounced on:16. h October, 2017 CO.PET. 42/2009 & CA Nos.2584/2016, 1619/2017 & OLR No.20/2016 SH. GIRIRAJ RATAN DAGA & ORS. ........ Petitioner Through : Mr.Suman Kumar, AR of SMC Global Securities Ltd applicant in CA No.2208/2016. versus GANGA YAMUNA FINVEST PRIVATE LTD ..... Respondent Through : Mr.Vibhor Garg and Ms.Puja ex- in Agarwal, Advocates directors liquidation. Ms.Sangeeta Chandra, Advocate for Official Liquidator. for company of CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.CA No.2208/2016 1. The applicant herein being a creditor of the respondent company in liquidation has filed this application for stay of the winding up proceedings alleging inter alia that winding up order(s) CO.PET. No.42/2009 Page 1 of 5 were procured by the petitioners in collusion with the respondent company and its ex-directors.2. It is alleged the petitioners are relatives of the ex-directors of the resp...
Tag this Judgment!Mamta Dhawan vs.naresh Dhawan
Court: Delhi
$~ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 2077/2013 & I.A.No.1788/2014 MAMTA DHAWAN ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Vivek Sharma, Advocate. versus NARESH DHAWAN % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN ..... Defendant Through Ms.Sumedha Dua, Advocate. Date of Decision:16. h October, 2017 MANMOHAN, J (ORAL): JUDGMENT1 Learned counsel for the plaintiff prays for an adjournment on the ground that the plaintiff is unwell. However, on the last date of hearing i.e. 21st August, 2017, this Court had made it clear that it would not grant any adjournment today. Consequently, the request for adjournment is declined.2. It is pertinent to mention that the present suit has been filed for declaration and permanent injunction on behalf of the plaintiff-wife and against the defendant-husband. CS (OS) 2077/2013 Page 1 of 7 3. In the present suit, the plaintiff-wife has prayed for a declaration that the consensual judgment and order dated 10th March, 2016 and the formal decree prepared on 02nd Febru...
Tag this Judgment!