Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 32 of about 590 results (0.021 seconds)Anant Raj Project Ltd. Vs.humble Hospitality (Delhi) Pvt Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 10.2017 ARB.P. 303/2017 ANANT RAJ PROJECT LTD. ........ Petitioner HUMBLE HOSPITALITY (DELHI) PVT LTD...... Respondent versus Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner . For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Ms Rekha Dwivedi, Advocate. : Ms Savi Abbot, Advocate. ARB.P. 303/2017 JUDGMENT1710.2017 1. The petitioner by this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, seeks appointment of a Sole Arbitrator.2. Term Sheet was executed between the petitioner and respondent, whereby the respondent took on License covered area measuring 9550 sq. ft. in the property bearing No.204A (206,207 and208) of the second floor of Complex, i.e. Moments Mall, Patel Road, Kirti Nagar, Delhi, and 715 sq. ft. in the property bearing No.205 of ARB.P. 303/2017 Page 1 of 4 the Second Floor of Complex, i.e. Moments Mall, Patel Road, Kirti Nagar, Delhi. Licence Agreement dated...
Tag this Judgment!Uttarakhand Agricultural Produce Marketing Board and Ors. Vs.competiti ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 17, 2017 + LPA6742017 UTTARAKHAND AGRICULTURAL PRODUCE MARKETING BOARD & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Avtar Singh Rawat, Senior Advocate & Mr. Virender Rawat, Advocate Versus COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG & Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Mr. Ved Prakash & Ms. Rehea, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. V.P. Singh, Mr. Raghav & Mr. Aishwarya Modi, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.(OPEN COURT) Caveat No.905/2017 Caveator/ respondent No.2 is represented through counsel. Caveat is discharged. LPA6742017 & C.M. 37420-21/2017 1. The Uttrakhand Agricultural Produce Marketing Board impugnes an order of the learned Single Judge rejecting its writ petition, challenging an order of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) LPA6742017 Page 1 of 8 made under Section 26(1) of The Competition Act...
Tag this Judgment!Jagdish Tytler vs.central Bureau of Investigation
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. 08.2017 Delivered on:17. 10.2017 CRL.M.C.1229/2016 & Crl.M.A.5286/2016 JAGDISH TYTLER ........ Petitioner versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr.Arvind K.Nigam, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Amit For the Respondent Sharma, Mr.Vaibhav Tomar, Ms.Shruti Choudhary, Mr.Karma Dorjee, Mr.Mikhil Sharda and Mr.Aditya Bhardwaj. : Mr.Narender Mann, SPP with Mr.Manoj Pant. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR JUDGMENT ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J1 The petitioner has challenged the order dated 09.12.2015 passed by the learned Special Judge (P.C.Act) (CBI)6, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in CC No.arising out of RC No.AC1/2012/A0011/CBI/New Delhi whereby the Court below has Crl.M.C.1229/2016 Page 1 of 32 refused to discharge the petitioner for the offences under Sections 120B read with Section 8 of the P.C.Act and Sections 420 and 471 of the IPC and has framed charges under the ...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Vectra Advanced Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Vs.uoi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:27. 07.2017 Pronounced on:17. 10.2017 + W.P.(C) 8106/2013, C.M. APPL.17117/2013 & 20170/2017 M/S. VECTRA ADVANCED ENGINEERING PVT. LTD. ..... Appellant Through : Sh. Balaji Subramanian with Sh. Siddharth Nath, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Sh. P.N. Misra, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Y. Chaudhary and Sh. Chetan Lokur, Advocates. Sh. Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC, for UOI with Sh. Shambhu Chaturvedi, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. GARG MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % Facts:1. The... Petitioner - M/s Vectra Advanced Engineering Private Limited (hereafter Vectra) seeks directions in respect of the award of a tender by the Union Ministry of Defence (hereafter MoD) for the acquisition of 606 Material Handing Cranes (MHC). Vectra is aggrieved because the W.P.(C) 8106/2013 Page 1 of 22 MoD has by letter dated 14.11.2013 declared second respondent, i.e. Span ...
Tag this Judgment!Som Dutt vs.union of India and Anr
Court: Delhi
$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 380/2017 Date of decision:17. h October, 2017 SOM DUTT Through: Mr. A.K. Trivedi, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR Through: Mr. Gigi C. George, Adv. for UOI ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) This is the second round of litigation by the petitioner, Som Dutt, who had applied for selection as Constable (General Duty) in Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF) Examination, 2012 as other backward class (OBC) candidate belonging to the State of Delhi.2. The petitioner having cleared physical examination test, had appeared in written examination in which he had secured 64 marks. However, letter of appointment was not issued to the petitioner as, while filing up the application form, he had not indicated and specified his preference for the police force he would like to join, i.e. Central Reserve Police Force, Assam Rifles, Boarder Secur...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Ramesh Vasudeva vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:17. h October, 2017 TEST.CAS. 60/2016 SHRI RAMESH VASUDEVA Represented by: Mr. Rohan Yadav, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ORS Represented by: Mr. Gursharan Singh, Adv. for ..... Respondent R-1. Mr. Varun Mehlawat, Adv. for R-2 to 9. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present petition filed under Section 276 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, the petitioner seeks grant of probate in his favour in respect of the last Will of Late Ms. Kamal Vasudeva executed on 25th January, 1997.2. Since no executor has been appointed in the Will dated 25th January, 1997 by the testator, probate cannot be granted by virtue of Section 222 of Indian Succession Act. However, Section 232 of the Act provides that where the deceased has made a Will but has not appointed an executor, a universal or a residuary legatee may be admitted to prove the Will, and letters of administration with the Will annexed may be gr...
Tag this Judgment!Gmr Rajahmundry Energy Limited vs.gail (India) Limited
Court: Delhi
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:17. 10.2017 ARB. P.648 /2017 GMR RAJAHMUNDRY ENERGY LIMITED ......... Petitioner versus GAIL (INDIA) LIMIED Advocates who appeared in this case: ..Respondent For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Chaitanya Salaya, Ms Shelly Bhasin and Mr Rishi Agarwala : Counsel for the respondent. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1710.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) IA Nos.11938-39/2017(both applications for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. ARB.P. 648/2017 1. The petitioner, by this petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeks appointment of an Arbitrator under Clause 16.2 of the Gas Transmission Agreement dated 14.07.2010 entered into between the parties. Respondent was to make necessary arrangements for ARB.P.648 /2017 the transportations of the Page 1 of 4 petitioners gas on the KG basin pipeline.2. The Dispute Resolution Clause agreed to between the p...
Tag this Judgment!Abhishek Verma Thr. Perokar/Friend Aaron Sindhu vs.c.b.i.
Court: Delhi
* % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:12. 10.2017 Delivered on:17. 10.2017 + W.P(CRL) 575/2016 & CRL.M.A.3187/2016 ABHISHEK VERMA THR. PEROKAR/FRIEND AARON SINDHU versus ........ Petitioner C.B.I. ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner : Mr. Maninder Singh with Mr.Dinhar For the... RESPONDENTS Takiar, Mr.Sankalp Kohli and Mr.Karan Mehta. : Mr.Narender Mann, SPP with Mr.Manoj Pant. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR JUDGMENT ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J1 The petitioner has challenged the order dated 09.12.2015 passed by the learned Special Judge (P.C.Act) (CBI)6, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in CC No.arising out of RC No.AC1/2012/A0011/CBI/New Delhi whereby the Court below has refused to discharge the petitioner for the offences under Sections 120B read with Section 8 of the P.C.Act, 1988; Sections 420 and 471 W.P(Crl.) 575/2016 Page 1 of 37 of the IPC; Sections 420 read with Section 511 of the IPC; Section 471 IPC and Section 8 of th...
Tag this Judgment!m/s.r.j.components and Shafts vs.m/s.deepak Industries Limited & Ors
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :20. h SEPTEMBER, 2017 DECIDED ON :17. h OCTOBER, 2017 M/S.R.J.COMPONENTS AND SHAFTS CS(OS) 900/2002 & CC2603 ..... Plaintiff Through : Mr.Sandeep Bhalla & Ms.Isha Bhalla, Advs. versus M/S.DEEPAK INDUSTRIES LIMITED & ORS..... Defendants Through : Mr.R.K.Jain, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Present suit CS(OS) 900/2002 has been preferred by Rajeev Kumar, proprietor trading under the name and style of M/s.R.J.Components & Shafts (hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff) against M/s.Deepak Industries Limited (hereinafter referred to as first defendant) and M/s.Gear Components & Shafts (India) Pvt.Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as second defendant) to restrain them from selling, offering, exposing of advertising for sale or procuring to be sold any such products which might be similar in nature and description of goods of the plaintiff under the trademark NAW or any other trademark identical with and / or...
Tag this Judgment!Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited vs.electricity Generation Incorporati ...
Court: Delhi
$~49 & 50 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO(OS) (COMM) 184/2017 Date of decision 17th October, 2017 BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED ..... Appellant Through Mr. Atul Shanker Mathur and Mr. Prabal Mehrotra, Advocates. versus ELECTRICITY GENERATION INCORPORATION & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Mayank Mishra and Mr. Ashwin Nayar, Advocates. Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate. FAO(OS) (COMM) 185/2017 BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED ..... Appellant Through Mr. Atul Shanker Mathur and Mr. Prabal Mehrotra, Advocates. Versus ELECTRICITY GENERATION INCORPORATION & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr. Mayank Mishra and Mr. Ashwin Nayar, Advocates. Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA FAO (OS) (COMM) 184 & 185/2017 Page 1 of 13 SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) These two intra-Court appeals under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 10 of ...
Tag this Judgment!