Delhi Court October 2017 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2017 Page 29 of about 590 results (0.019 seconds)Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson(publ)..... Vs.xiaomi Technology & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:09. h October, 2017 Pronounced on:24. h October, 2017 CS(COMM) 434/2016, CC Nos.60-65/2015, CC (O) No.11/2015 IANos.24580-81/2014, 11784/2015, 17428/2015, 25545/2015, 9253/2016 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON(PUBL)..... Plaintiff Through : Mr. R. Virmani and Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocates with Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Ms. Saya Chaudhary Kapoor, Mr. Adithya Jayaraj, Mr. Prateek Sehrawat, Mr. Devanshu Khanna & Mrs. Karnika Kanwar & Mr. Ujjwal Sinha, Advocates. versus XIAOMI TECHNOLOGY & ORS ..... Defendants Through : Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal with Ms. Julin George, Ms. Raxchel Mamatha, Ms. Anu Paarcha, Mr. Garg, Mr.Yashwant Prasad & Ms. Nilofar Abbasar, Advocates for D-1. Ms. Ria Anand, Advocate for D-3. Yatinder CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA YOGESH KHANNA, J.IA No.5893/2016 1. This is an application by the plaintiff seeking constitution of confidential club. The plaintiff has filed the suit for permanent injunction C...
Tag this Judgment!Shekhar & Anr. Vs.ajay Kumar Sharma
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. h October, 2017. RC.REV. No.123/2017, CM No.10230/2017 (for stay) and CM No.30688/2017 (for correction of order dated 31st July, 2017) SHEKHAR & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. R.K. Jain and Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Advs. Versus AJAY KUMAR SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. R.K. Singh, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW This Rent Control Revision Petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi 1. Rent Control Act, 1958 impugns the order [dated 16th November, 2016 in E.No.6/16 (New No.77585/16) of the Court of Additional Rent Controller- 02, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi) of dismissal of the application filed by the two petitioners for leave to defend the petition for eviction filed by the respondent under Section 14(1)(e) of the Act and the consequent order of eviction of the petitioners from shop no.4508 at ground floor, Main Road, Pahari Dhiraj, Sadar Bazar, Delhi 110 006 in the tenancy of t...
Tag this Judgment!Rina Devi & Ors. Vs.mohan Lal Gurjar & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.132/2017 RINA DEVI & ORS. ..... Appellants Through: Mr. S.K. Vashishtha, Adv. versus MOHAN LAL GURJAR & ORS Through: None. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. By judgment dated 27.10.2016, the tribunal decided three accident claim petitions including one (suit No.3845/2016) for and on behalf of the appellants seeking compensation on account of death of Pradeep Yadav in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 21.03.2005 involving negligent driving of motor vehicle bearing registration No.HR617689, admittedly insured against third party risk with the third respondent for the period in question. The Tribunal awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs. 13,10,000/-, it inclusive of Rs. 20,000/- towards medical expenses rejecting the claim of the appellants that an amount of Rs. 7,82,404/- had been incurred in the treatment observing that only a bill...
Tag this Judgment!Dr. Vandana Tarneja vs.university of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: October 24, 2017 W.P.(C) 7981/2014 DR. VANDANA TARNEJA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Apurb Lal, Ms. Meenu Pandey and Ms. Sunita Kumari, Advocates Versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, and Ms. Prang Newmai, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT (ORAL)... Petitioner was a Lecturer in Psychology in Gargi College, affiliated to University of Delhi, whose services stood terminated vide impugned letter of 1st August, 2014 w.e.f. 17th January, 2006. It is not in dispute that petitioner had been on leave on and off from August, 2004 till 17th January, 2006 because of her medical illness. Prior to termination of petitioners service, she had applied for voluntary retirement on medical grounds on 15th April, 2010 and had sought voluntary retirement from February, 2006 with a request that medical leave taken by her prior thereto be treated as qualifying service for pen...
Tag this Judgment!Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs.chittranjan Dass Nukla & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-353 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:24. h October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL5272011 and CM111232011 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Ranjan Verma, Adv. versus CHITTRANJAN DASS NUKLA & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-6 Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant herein is the insurer of the truck bearing registration no.RJ-23G-0574 which was one of the vehicles involved in a motor vehicular accident that took place on 11.03.2003, giving rise to the cause of action in favour of the first respondent to seek compensation through his accident claim case (MACP3992010) instituted on 19.04.2004, for injuries consequently suffered, the other vehicle being Toyota Qualis bearing registration no.HR-02G-2126 which was statedly insured against third party risk with National Insurance Company Ltd. (the sixth respondent).2. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal), by its judgment dated 03.01.2...
Tag this Judgment!Prem Rani & Ors vs.keshav Smarak Samiti
Court: Delhi
$~19 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CM(M) 1495/2011 & CM No.9921/2013 (for stay) PREM RANI & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. S.K. Bhaduri & Mr. Prem Prakash, Advs. Versus KESHAV SMARAK SAMITI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Alok Kumar & Mr. Amit Kumar Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER2410.2017 CM No.9919/2013 (of the petitioners under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963) 1. The petitioners preferred the aforesaid CM (M) No.1495/2011 impugning the order [dated 11th November, 2011 in RCT No.95/2009 (Old No.593/2004), Unique ID No.02401C5971032004 of the Court of the Additional Rent Control Tribunal (ARCT), West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi]. dismissing the appeal preferred by the petitioners under Section 38 of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 against the order dated 8th November, 2004 in E. No.89/2000 of the Court of the Additional Rent Controller, Delhi allowing the petition for eviction filed by the respondent against the petit...
Tag this Judgment!Ashok Ahswal vs.state of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~R-11A to R-11C * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + AND + AND + Date of Decision : October 23, 2017 CRL.A. 99/2002 ASHOK AHSWAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Mukesh Kalia, Mr.Sudarshan Rajan, Mr.Arjun Gadhoke & Ms.Chand Gera, Advs. versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Varun PS Hauz Khas CRL.A. 105/2002 RAJINDER KUMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Vikas Jain, Advocate. versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Varun PS Hauz Khas CRL.A.852/2002 Through: None. ..... Appellant versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for the SANJAY STATE State with SI Varun PS Hauz Khas CRL.A.Nos.99/2002, 105/2002 & 852/2002 Page 1 of 17 PRATIBHA RANI, J.(ORAL) 1. By this common judgment, the above three appeals which have been filed by the appellants namely Ashok Ahswal, Rajinder Kumar and Sanjay challenging the judgment dated 24th January, 2002 and order on sentence dated 25th Januar...
Tag this Judgment!The New India Assurance Co Ltd vs.sushila Tyagi & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d October, 2017 + MAC.APP. 131/2017 & CM No.8735/2017 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pramod K. Singh, Adv. versus SUSHILA TYAGI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. On accident claim case (MACT3282011 - MACT new No.14689/15) of first to fourth respondents (collectively the claimants), the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (tribunal), by judgment dated 30.11.2016, awarded compensation in the total sum of Rs. 26,18,200/- on account of death of Shiv Kumar Tyagi, a businessman, aged 40 years, in motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 03.10.2010 due to negligent driving of motor vehicle bearing registration No.GL-12V-6515, admittedly insured against third party risk with the appellant Insurance Company (insurer) fastening the liability on the latter to pay the said amount with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing ...
Tag this Judgment!Up State Road Transport Corp. Vs.karun Gangwar
Court: Delhi
$~R-347 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL5142011 and CM109242011 UP STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORP. ..... Appellant Through: versus KARUN GANGWAR Through: Ms. Garima Prashad, Advocate None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The first respondent (claimant) had instituted accident claim case (suit no.193/2008) on 17.03.2008 seeking compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 for injuries suffered in a motor vehicular accident that had occurred on 30.10.2007. He alleged in the claim case that while waiting on the roadside for a transport, he was hit by a bus bearing registration No.UP-76F-9858 of the appellant, it being driven at the relevant point of time by its driver- cum-employee Rajesh Kumar Gupta who was also impleaded as party respondent.2. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Tribunal) held inquiry and, by judgment dated 05.02.2011, accepted the case for compensation holding the ...
Tag this Judgment!Sushil Saxena vs.sandeep & Ors.
Court: Delhi
$~R-346 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:23. d October, 2017 + MAC APPEAL No.508/2011 SUSHIL SAXENA ..... Appellant Through: None. versus SANDEEP & ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Adv. for R CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The appellant while driving his scooter bearing registration No.DL4M8683on 08.05.2007 suffered injuries when his scooter was hit by Tata tempo bearing registration No.DL1D3660 the latter having been driven in a negligent manner. On his accident claim case (case No.313/2008) instituted on 13.07.2007, the tribunal held inquiry and, by judgment dated 23.03.2011, accepted the case for compensation holding the tempo driver responsible. Compensation in the total sum of Rs. 80,700/- was awarded, the liability having been fastened against the third respondent (national insurance), insurer of the tempo, such amount inclusive of Rs. 5,700/- towards treatment expenses; Rs. 20,000/- towards pain & suffering; Rs. 5,...
Tag this Judgment!