Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2016 Page 52 of about 517 results (0.018 seconds)North Delhi Municipal Corpration & Anr vs.vikas Gupta
Court: Delhi
$~163 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA9202016 & CMs 43942-43/2016 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPRATION & ANR..... Appellants Through : Mr. Sunil Goel, Advocate with Mr. Biswajeet Roy, Deputy Controller of Accounts (HQ) in RFA7862016 versus VIKAS GUPTA Through : Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % Appearance is entered by learned counsel for the respondent. A ORDER0112.2016 compete set of the paper book be furnished to him in the course of the day.2. Counsels for the parties jointly state that the present appeal may be disposed of in terms of the orders that were passed in RFA No.786/2016, on 17.11.2016 and today.3. The appeal is accordingly disposed of, along with the pending applications, in terms of the orders passed in RFA No.786/2016 on 17.11.2016 and today. HIMA KOHLI, J DECEMBER01 2016 sk...
Tag this Judgment!Satish Bansal vs.enershell Alloys & Steel Ltd Thr Its Managing Directo ...
Court: Delhi
$~3. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA8302016 and CM APPL. 39259/2016 1. SATISH BANSAL ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Bhrigu Dhami, Advocate versus ENERSHELL ALLOYS & STEEL LTD THR ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR GAURAV Through: None ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The appellant/plaintiff is aggrieved by the order dated 23.03.2016 ORDER0112.2016 passed by the trial court, dismissing his suit for recovery of money, for non- prosecution.2. On 24.10.2016, counsel for the appellant was directed to file an affidavit alongwith the relevant documents to demonstrate the manner in which compliances of the order dated 17.12.2015 passed by the trial court were made for effecting service on the respondent/defendant by registered post, courier and dasti.3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, an affidavit dated 07.11.2016 has been filed by the appellant, wherein it is stated that on 21.09.2015, the trial court had issued summons to the respon...
Tag this Judgment!Tarun Batra & Ors vs.the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 1653/2016 Date of Decision: December 1st, 2016 TARUN BATRA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Ms.Guneet Khehar, Adv. versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP. Respondent no.2 in person with Mr.Madhukar, Adv. for Mr.Anirudh Mishra, Adv. proxy CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI ORDER P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Tarun Batra, Sh. R.K. Batra, Smt. Alka Batra and Sh. Varun Batra for quashing of FIR No.556/2013 dated 21.11.2013, under Sections 498-A/4IPC registered at Police Station Kalkaji on the basis of a mediation report of the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, New Delhi in view of the settlement arrived at between petitioners and respondent no.2, namely, Ms. Deepti Sachdeva on 26.05.2015.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2, present in the Court has been identified t...
Tag this Judgment!North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.jyoti Bala
Court: Delhi
$~150 and 21 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA7862016 & RFA1922016 NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Appellant ..... Appellant EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Through : Mr. Sunil Goel, Standing counsel for NorthDMC with Mr. Biswajeet Roy, Deputy Controller of Accounts (HQ) in RFA7862016 Ms. Anushruti, proxy counsel for Ms. Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel for EDMC with Ms. Vasundara Nayyar, Ms. Namrata, with Mr. P.D. Hariprasad, Deputy Controller of Accounts (HQ) in RFA1922016 versus ..... Respondent ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Vishesh Wadhwa with Ms. Bandana Grover, Advocate in RFA7862016 Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Advocate in RFA1922016 JYOTI BALA MAHENDER SINGH CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI ORDER0112.2016 RFA No.192/2016 is treated as a lead matter in all connected % 1. appeals filed by the appellant/EDMC. Similarly, RFA No.786/2016 has been treated as a lead matter in all connected appeals filed by the appellant/NrDMC. RFA786/2016 & RFA1922016 Page 1 of 9 ...
Tag this Judgment!Tantia-Ccil (Jv) vs.union of India
Court: Delhi
$~12 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ARB.P. 615/2016 TANTIA-CCIL (JV), ........ Petitioner Through: Mr Soumya Chakraborty, Senior Advocate with Mr Rajesh Pathak and Mr Chakraborty, Advocates. Abhishek versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr Jagjit Singh, Mr Preet Singh and Ms Kiran, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % ORDER0112.2016 VIBHU BAKHRU, J1 The petitioner (hereafter TCJV) has filed the present petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation, Act, 1996, inter alia, praying that a Sole Arbitrator or a panel of three Arbitrators be appointed to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.2. TCJV is a joint venture between M/s Tantia Constructions Ltd. and Continental Construction Infrastructure Limited for construction of 1.80 kms. long tunnel on realigned path in Udhampur-Katra Section in connection with Udhampur-Srinagar-Baramulla Rail Link Project. The tender for the aforesaid works were invited by the respondent in Udhampu...
Tag this Judgment!Anuj Pratap Chauhan & Ors vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2966/2016 + ANUJ PRATAP CHAUHAN & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Dr.Kanwal Sapra, Adv. Date of Decision: December 1st, 2016 STATE & ORS versus ..... Respondent Through Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP. Respondent no.2 and 3 in person with Mr.H.R. Dhamija, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Anuj Pratap Chauhan, Sh. Gulshan Chauhan and Sh. Sanyog for quashing of CC No.559/1/11 dated 11.11.2011, under Sections 452/323/506(2)/34 IPC registered at Police Station Sarita Vihar on the basis of Mediation Report of the Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, New Delhi executed between the petitioners and respondent nos.2 & 3 namely, Sh. Vikas Chauhan and Sh. Keshav Chauhan on 28.07.2016. respondent-State 2. submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first informant and respondent no.3 has been iden...
Tag this Judgment!Mkj Developers Limited vs.green Acre Holdings Limited
Court: Delhi
$~16 * % + THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:01. 12.2016 FAO(OS) 336/2016 & CM APPL.43650/2016 & 43652-53/2016 MKJ DEVELOPERS LIMITED GREEN ACRE HOLDINGS LIMITED versus .... Appellant .... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant : Mr Arvind Nigam, Sr. Adv. with Mr K. Datta, Mr Sarvapriya & Mr Rahul Malhotra. : Mr Raashi Sen with Mr Mohit Sharma. For Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT1 This appeal is directed against the order dated 18.10.2006 passed by a learned single Judge of this Court in CS(OS) No.719/2006. Earlier, a preliminary decree had been passed in the said suit on 15.07.2013. In the judgment of the same date, the learned single Judge, while declaring the shares of the parties, made it clear that the passing of the preliminary decree as prayed for in the suit would not affect any of the rights and FAO(OS) 336/2016 Page 1 of 9 contenti...
Tag this Judgment!