Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2016 Page 51 of about 517 results (0.020 seconds)Saroj Aggarwal vs.nimish Singhania Huf
Court: Delhi
$~A-22 * % + RC.REV. 250/2015 Date of decision:01. 12.2016 ........ Petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SAROJ AGGARWAL Through Mr. Amit Sibal, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Sudhir Nagar and Mr.Ayush Aggarwal, Advocates NIMISH SINGHANIA HUF versus ..... Respondent Through Dr.N.Pradeep Sharma, Mr.Ashuthosh Lohia, Mr.Pawan Kumar and Ms.Pragya Srivastava, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. The present Revision Petition is filed under section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as The DRC Act) seeking to impugn the Eviction Order dated 26.11.2014 passed by the Additional Rent Controller (hereinafter referred to as The ARC) under section 14(1)(e) of The DRC Act.2. The petitioner is the tenant of the property being ground floor A-14/3, Jamna Bhawan, Asaf Ali Road, New Delhi. The premises was let out to the petitioner on 1.1.1974 at the rent of Rs.400/- per month. The respondent has filed the Eviction Petition stating tha...
Tag this Judgment!Steel Authority of India Limited vs.m/s Everest Rolling Industries Pri ...
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED FAO (OS) 231/2016 Judgment delivered on:01. 12.2016 ... Appellant versus M/S EVEREST ROLLING INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED Advocates who appeared in this case:-"For the Appellant For the Respondent CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR : Mr Shaiwal Srivastava : Ms Gaganpreet Chawla ... Respondent JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J1 This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and / or order dated 23.05.2016 delivered by a learned single Judge of this court in OMP202016 and IA Nos.6525-6526/2016. By virtue of the impugned judgment, the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), which was filed by the appellant, was dismissed on the ground of limitation.2. The arbitral award was made on 20.10.2014 and was received by the appellant on 03.11.2014. Initially, the appellant filed OMP No.198/2015 FAO (OS) 231/...
Tag this Judgment!Namita Singh vs.university of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) No.2674/2016 + % NAMITA SINGH1t December, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Singh, Advocate with Ms. Chandini Mehra, Advocate and Mr. Suman Kumar, Advocate. UNIVERSITY OF DELHI & ANR. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Advocate with Ms. Simran Jeet, Advocate for respondent No.1. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. By this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner questions the actions of the respondent no.2/college whereby the respondent no.2/college claims that the petitioner has not been appointed to the post of Assistant Professor (History) with the respondent no.2/college. 2(i)... Petitioner pursuant to the advertisements issued by the respondent no.2/college dated 4.2.2014 and 14-21.2.2014 applied for one of the post in the advertisement being the post of Assistant Professor (Histor...
Tag this Judgment!Tarun Kumar Sharma vs.state
Court: Delhi
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of hearing and Order : December 01, 2016 + BAIL APPLN. 2430/2016 TARUN KUMAR SHARMA Through: Mr. Tarun Kumar Bedi, Mr. Arjun Singh Bhati, Mr. Sidharth Agarwal, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus STATE Through: Mr. Ashish Datta, Additional Public ..... Respondent Prosecutor for the State with Sub- Inspector Sandeep Rathi, Police Station Ranhola, Delhi CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI ORDER % P.S.TEJI, J.(Oral) 1. By this petition filed under Section 439 of Cr. P.C., read with Section 482 of Cr. P.C., the petitioner seeks bail in a case registered as FIR No.780/2015 under Section 498-A/4of Indian Penal Code, at Police Station Ranhola, Delhi.2. The prosecution case is based on the complaint filed by Mrs.Renu Sharma before the CAW Cell and it is only by the recommendation of CAW Cell, the present FIR was registered against Bail. Appln. No.2430/2016 Page 1 of 6 the petitioner and his parents on 24.09.2015. Investigations carried out a...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi-I vs.m/s Bhushan Steels & Strips Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~12 * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on:01. 12.2016 ITA3142003 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-I ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rahul Chaudhary & Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Advs. versus M/S BHUSHAN STEELS & STRIPS LTD ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Kavita Jha, Ms. Roopali Gupta and Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J (Oral) 1. The question of law framed in this appeal is as follows:"Whether the ITAT was correct in law in holding that the respondent-assessee is entitled to depreciation under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act even when the assessee was not the owner of the property in question and was in possession thereof as a lessee during the year under consideration?. The facts of the case are that the assessee for the Assessment 2. Year (AY) 1994-95 had reported that it had entered into a lease agreement with M/s Nehru Place Hotels Limited on 16.04.1993. It also stated tha...
Tag this Judgment!Sanjay Kumar Thakur and Ors vs.north Delhi Municipal Corporation of De ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5828/2016 Reserved on:23. 09.2016 Date of Decision:01. 12.2016 SANJAY KUMAR THAKUR AND ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Apurb Lal & Ms. Meenu Pandey, Advocates. versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Biji Rajesh, Ms. Aditi Gupta & Mr. Gaurang Kanth, Advocate for NDMC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA SUNITA GUPTA, J.The present writ petition impugns the order dated 10.5.2016 passed by the Principal Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal, whereby O.A. No.1749/2015 filed by the petitioners has been dismissed.2. The petitioners were appointed as Laboratory Assistants in the erstwhile Municipal Corporation of Delhi between July, 2004 and October, 2004. After trifurcation of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi, the petitioners were assigned to the North Delhi Municipal Corporation (Corporation for short).3. The petitioners proclaim that ...
Tag this Judgment!Keshav Chauhan & Ors vs.state & Ors
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2967/2016 Date of Decision: December 1st, 2016 KESHAV CHAUHAN & ORS ........ Petitioners STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.H.R. Dhamija, Adv. versus Through Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP. Respondent no.2 and 3 in person with Dr.Kanwal Sapra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners, namely, Sh. Keshav Chauhan, Sh. Vikas @ Chinki and Sh. Mora Chauhan @ Vikram for quashing of FIR No.279/2011 dated 20.10.2011, under Sections 323/3IPC registered at Police Station Sarita Vihar on the basis of Mediation Report of the Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, New Delhi in CC. No.559/1/11 executed between the petitioners and respondent nos.2 & 3 namely, Sh. Anuj Chauhan and Sh. Gulshan Chauhan on 28.07.2016.2. respondent-State for submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first informant and responden...
Tag this Judgment!Food Corporation of India vs.appellant Authority Central Under Industr ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:01. 12.2016 R.P. 92/2016 in W.P.(C) 1676/2008 FOOD CORPORATION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Karunesh Tandon, Advocate versus + APPELLANT AUTHORITY CENTRAL UNDER INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT & ORS. ..... Respondent Through Mr.Inderjeet Singh, Advocate for R-2 % CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.Review Petition No.92/2016 1. Vide this application u/O XXXXVII r/w Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the petitioner seeks review of the order dated 22nd July, 2015 vide which the writ petition filed by him challenging the order of the Appellate Tribunal under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) was dismissed.2. Before going to the application in hand, it will be in the fitness of things to narrate the circumstances leading to the filing of the present application.3. The management of Food Corporation of India, New Delhi submitted an appe...
Tag this Judgment!P. Sridhar Kumar & Anr vs.maj R Vasudevan & Ors
Court: Delhi
$~8. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA7412015 P. SRIDHAR KUMAR & ANR Through: None versus ..... Appellants ........ RESPONDENTS MAJ R VASUDEVAN & ORS Through: Mr. Amit Bajaj, Advocate for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER0112.2016 CM APPL. 15095/2016 (by R-1 for dismissal of the appeal) 1. The present application has been filed by the respondent No.1 praying inter alia for dismissal of the appeal on account of non-compliance of the order dated 05.02.2016.2. Notice was issued on this application on 27.04.2016, returnable on 19.05.2016. On 19.05.2016, fresh notice was issued to the non- applicants/appellants returnable on 05.09.2016 and thereafter on 17.11.2016. On 17.11.2016, counsel for respondent No.1 had stated that he had personally served the counsel for the appellants with a copy of this application at his chamber at the Tis Hazari Court Complex. He had handed over proof of service, which was taken on record. Despite service of the application on the...
Tag this Judgment!Keshav Chauhan vs.state & Anr
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 2968/2016 + KESHAV CHAUHAN Date of Decision: December 1st, 2016 ........ Petitioner Through Mr.H.R. Dhamija, Adv. versus STATE & ANR ..... Respondent Through Ms.Mandeep Arya, APP. Respondent no.2 in person with Dr.Kanwal Sapra, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI P.S.TEJI, J.1. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Sh. Keshav Chauhan for quashing of FIR No.119/2011 dated 13.06.2011, under SectionsIPC registered at Police Station Sarita Vihar on the basis of Mediation Report of the Mediation Centre, Saket Courts, New Delhi in view of the settlement arrived between the petitioner and respondent no.2 namely, Sh. Yudhvir Singh and on 28.07.2016.2. respondent-State submitted that the respondent No.2 present in the Court has been identified to be the complainant/first informant in the FIR in question by his counsel.3. The factual matrix of the present case is that on 13.06.2011, around 8:...
Tag this Judgment!