Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vynova Wilhelmshaven Gmbh vs.the Designated Authority Directorate Gene ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2016
$~27 TO29* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:02. 12.2016 + W.P.(C) 6065/2016 VYNOVA WILHELMSHAVEN GMBH THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF ANTI DUMPING AND ALLIED DUTIES, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner versus + W.P.(C) 7603/2016, C.M. APPL.31288/2016, 31289/2016, 31290/2016 & 31291/2016 INOVYN SVERIGE AB versus THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY, DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF ANTI-DUMPING AND ALLIED DUTIES, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRIES & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner + W.P.(C) 8036/2016, C.M. APPL.33327/2016, 33328/2016, 33359/2016 & 3330/2016 versus INOVYN CHLORVINYLS LTD. THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF ANTI DUMPING AND ALLIED DUTIES, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRIES & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS ........ Petitioner Through : Sh. Balbir Singh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Aashish Gupta, Sh. Aditya Mukherjee and Sh. Angad Sandhu, Advocates, for petitioners, ...
M/S m.v.omni Projects (India) Ltd. Vs.nbcc (India) Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2016
$~24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11385/2016 Judgment delivered on:02. 12.2016 M/S M.V.OMNI PROJECTS (INDIA) LTD. ........ Petitioner versus ..... Respondent NBCC (INDIA) LTD. Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA : Mr. V.K.Garg, Sr. Advocate with Mr.O.P.Bhadani, Mr Jaswant Persoya and Mr Neeraj Sharma : Mr Abir Phukan with Mr. Surya Prakash and Ms Saumya Sharma SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL) JUDGMENT CM No.44646/2016 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exception. W.P.(C) 11385/2016 & CM No.44645/2016 (stay) 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 08.11.2016, whereby, it has been directed to place the petitioner in the holiday list for a period of two years with immediate effect and to disqualify the petitioner from any tender which is in process. WP(C) 11385/2016 Page 1 of 3 2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner has contended that no show cause notice contemplating...
Rajeev Ajemera vs.sneh Puri
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2016
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA8712016 RAJEEV AJEMERA ..... Appellant Through : Dr. Anurag Kumar Agarwal, Advocate versus SNEH PURI Through :Mr. Arvind Dhingra, Advocate ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % ORDER0212.2016 Caveat No.949/2016 1. Appearance is entered on behalf of the caveator, who states that a complete set of the paper book has been served on him.2. In view of the above, the caveat stands discharged. RFA8712016 & CMs No.41283-84/2016 1. The appellant/defendant is aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 21.9.2016 pronounced by the trial court in a suit for possession, mesne profits and permanent injunction instituted against him by the respondent/plaintiff.2. Under the impugned judgment and decree, the trial court has granted a decree of recovery of possession in favour of the respondent/plaintiff in respect of the suit premises bearing No.2499, Ground Floor, Ward No.13, Teliwara Road, Sadar Bazar, Delhi; a decree of recovery of...
Gursheen Ahuja & Ors vs.guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University & Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2016
$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + W.P.(C) 11289/2016 & CM No.44188/2016 Judgment delivered on:02. 12.2016 GURSHEEN AHUJA & ORS ........ Petitioners versus GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner . For the Respondent : Mr. Manish Raghav, Adv. : Mr. Vaibhav Kalra and Mr. Jasbir Bidhuri, Advocates for R-1 to 3 Mr. Saket Sikri, Ms. Shiva Tokas, Mr. Ajay Pal and Ms. Adwaita Sharma, Advocates for R-4 Ms. Shraddha Bhargava, Adv. for R-5 CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) 1. The petitioners seek a mandamus against the respondents to allow the petitioners to take the third semester examinations scheduled in November and December, 2016. The petitioners had taken admission in their respective courses for the academic session 2015-16.2. It is the contention of the petitioners that though the petitioner were admitted to the third semester, they are not...
M/S Proto Developers & Technologies Ltd vs.dewan Housing Finance Corpo ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2016
$~12. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9018/2016 and CM APPL. 36532/2016 1. M/S PROTO DEVELOPERS & TECHNOLOGIES LTD....... Petitioner Through: Mr. Pankaj Garg, Advocate with Mr. Milind Garg, Advocate versus DEWAN HOUSING FINANCE CORPORATION LTD.. Respondent Through: Mr. Yashasvi S.K. Chocksey, Advocate for Ms. Shweta Kapoor, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % On the last date of hearing, counsel for the petitioner was requested to ORDER0212.2016 give a written intimation of the next date of hearing to the counsel for the respondent. Pursuant thereto, proxy counsel enters appearance and seeks a pass over on the ground that the arguing counsel is unavailable.2. It is pertinent to note that on 17.11.2016, it had been enquired from learned counsel for the petitioner as to how would the present petition be maintainable in this Court when the respondent is admittedly based in NOIDA, UP and the housing loan in question was disbursed by the respondent to the pe...
Consulting Engineering Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs.ministry of Defen ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2016
$~24 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11366/2016 Judgment delivered on:02. 12.2016 ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES (INDIA) PVT. LTD. versus MINISTRY OF DEFENCE Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner For the Respondent : Mr Rajshekhar Rao with Ms. Zehra Khan : Mr Gaurang Kanth, Ms. Biji Rajesh and Mr Pushkar Taimni. Mr Abhilesh Shukla (Director Contract), Ministry of Defence. CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL) CM No.44608/2016 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM No.44607/2016 (leave to file lengthy synopsis) 1. This is an application seeking leave to file lengthy synopsis.2. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The lengthy synopsis is taken on record. WP(C) 11366/2016 Page 1 of 3 W.P.(C) 11366/2016 & CM No.44606/2016 (for ex-parte relief) 1. The petitioner impugns order dated 24.10.2016, whereby, the petit...
Poonam David Massey & Ors vs.the Deacon Committee of the Central Bapti ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2016
$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA8542016 & CM405782016 1. POONAM DAVID MASSEY & ORS Through : Mr. Sunil Goyal, Advocate with appellant in person. ..... Appellants versus THE DEACON COMMITTEE OF THE CENTRAL BAPTIST CHURCH & ORS Through : Mr. G.B. Sewak, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % Pursuant to the limited notice issued to the respondent after the appeal ORDER0212.2016 was dismissed as not pressed by counsel for the appellant on 02.11.2016, learned counsel enters appearance on behalf of the respondents and states that he shall be filing his power of attorney in the course of the day.2. Both the parties have interacted with each other and they have agreed on the following terms of settlement:-"a) It has been agreed that the appellants shall be permitted to occupy the suit premises till 30.5.2017. b) During the said duration, the appellants shall continue paying the electricity and water charges in respect of the suit premises. c)...
Rajiv Sharma vs.govt.of Nct & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2016
$~23. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11408/2016 and CM APPL. 44692/2016 1. RAJIV SHARMA Through Mr.Mohit Kr.Shah and Mr.Tungesh, Advocates ........ Petitioner versus GOVT.OF NCT & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Akshay Choudhary, Advocate for R-1 Ms.Kanika Agnihotri, Advocate for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present ORDER0212.2016 petition, while reserving the right of his client to seek his remedies against the respondent No.2/NDMC, on the criminal side and/or on the civil side, as may be permissible in law.2. Leave, as prayed for is granted. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn, along with the pending application. HIMA KOHLI, J DECEMBER02 2016 mk...
Rakesh Sharma vs.surender Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2016
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d October, 2016 Pronounced on:2. d December, 2016 CS (OS) 3121/2014 RAKESH SHARMA Through: Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Advocate with Ms. Damini Chawla, Advocate ..... Plaintiff SURENDER SHARMA & ORS. Versus ..... Defendants Through: Ex-parte CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA JUDGMENT R.K. GAUBA, J:1. This civil suit for partition and injunction (permanent and mandatory) was instituted by Rakesh Sharma son of Late Shri Tilak Raj Sharma (the plaintiff) who claims to be the brother of the two defendants, they being Shri Surendra Sharma son of Late Shri Tilak Raj Sharma (first defendant) and Smt. Shobha Sharma (since deceased) described as married daughter of Late Shri Tilak Raj Sharma (second defendant) represented by her legal heirs, the reliefs being sought concerning third floor (along with terrace rights) of property bearing No.C-46, old number A/168, measuring 225 sq. yards, out of Khasra No.351, 352 and 353, situated in Mahendru...
Jai Gopal & Ors vs.vikas Bansal
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-02-2016
$~A-33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + RC.REV. 567/2016 JAI GOPAL & ORS Date of decision:02. 12.2016 ........ Petitioners Through Mr. G.P.Thareja, Advocate. Versus VIKAS BANSAL ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ajay Kumar Gupta and Ms.Surbhi Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) CAV10102016 Since the counsel for the respondent has entered appearance, the caveat stands discharged. CM No.44308/2016 (exemption) Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. RC.REV. 567/2016 and CM No.44307/20016 (u/O41R5CPC) 1. The present revision petition is filed under Section 25 B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the DRC Act) to impugn the eviction order dated 10.06.2016 under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act passed by the Additional Rent Controller (ARC).2. The petitioners are the tenants of a shop comprising of ground floor and mezzanine floor in property No.367/III, Katra Hussian Bux, Khari RC.REV. 567/2016 Page 1 of...
- ‹ Prev
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 50
- 51
- 52
- Next ›
- Last »