Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S Hargobind Fashions Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Vs.state Bank of Patiala & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2016
$~30. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11544/2016 and CM APPL. 45447 & 45448/2016 1. M/S HARGOBIND FASHIONS PVT. LTD. & ORS........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Soumya Chakarvati, Sr.Advocate with Ms.Usha Singh & Mr.Akhilesh Mishra, Advocates versus STATE BANK OF PATIALA & ORS. ....... RESPONDENTS Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % After addressing arguments for some time on the maintainability of ORDER0612.2016 the present petition as raised by this court, Mr.Chakarvati, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the petitioners states on instructions from the briefing counsel that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition, while reserving the right of his clients to approach the DRT/DRAT, for appropriate orders.2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The petitioners are at liberty to seek their remedies before the DRT/DRAT, as may be available to them in law.3. The petition is disposed of, along with the pending applications. HIMA KOHLI, J DECEMBER06 2016 mk...
Canara Bank vs.gulzari Lal Kwatra
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + LETERS PATENT APPEAL No.1041/2011 Reserved on:26. h October, 2016 Date of decision:6. h December, 2016 CANARA BANK ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Naveen R. Nath, Advocate. Versus GULZARI LAL KWATRA .... Respondent Through: Mr. Mukul Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajat Katyal and Mr. Sumit Kumar Mishra, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA SANJIV KHANNA, J.The present intra-Court appeal impugns the order dated 1st September, 2011 passed in W.P. (C) No.2438/1996, Gulzari Lal Kwatra Vs. Union of India & Anr. The aforesaid writ petition filed by Gulzari Lal Kwatra, the respondent herein, stands allowed with the direction that the respondent, who had suffered punishment of compulsory retirement, would be entitled to pension under the Canara Bank (Employees) Pension Regulations, 1995, (Pension Regulations, for short). The order and judgment of the Single Judge follows the decision dated 30th May 1997...
Leela Veer Singh vs.new Delhi Municipal Council & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2016
$~8-13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment dated 06thDecember, 2016 + W.P.(C) 5277/2016 & C.M. No.22075/2016 (for stay) JAGDISH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Ms.Aastha Dhawan & Ms.Wamika Trehan, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr.Mananjay Kr. Mishra, Ms.Vidhi Jain, Mr.Shailja Nanda Mishra, Advocates for respondents No.1 & 2 along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO, NDMC in person. Mr.Rahul Sharma, Advocate with Mr.C.K.Bhatt, Advocate for respondent No.3. + W.P.(C) 5286/2016 & C.M. No.22119/2016 (for stay) LEELA VEER SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Kirti Uppal, Senior Advocate with Ms.Aastha Dhawan & Ms.Wamika Trehan, Advocates versus NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.Sri Harsha Peechara, ASC with Mr.Mananjay Kr. Mishra, Ms.Vidhi Jain, Mr.Shailja Nanda Mishra, Advocates for respondents No.1 & 2 along with Mr.Narayan Kumar, ALO,...
Rajesh Kumar vs.delhi Development Authority & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2016
$~ 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 6, 2016 RSA3692016 RAJESH KUMAR % + CORAM: HONBLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT (Oral) versus Through : Mr.Anil Anand, Advocate ..... Appellant DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR Through : Mr.Arun Birbal, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS 1. This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the judgment of the First Appellate Court dated September 05, 2016. The First Appellate Court dismissed the Regular Civil Appeal of the appellant concurring with the finding of the learned Trial Court that the plaintiff was not entitled to a decree of mandatory injunction directing DDA to allot a flat to him which was booked by his father under NPRS Scheme, 1979.2. 3. The facts are not in dispute. Sh.Sharwan Kumar Sahni, father of the appellant applied for a Janta flat of DDA under the New Pattern Registration Scheme (NPRS) vide registration Slip No.10289 dated April 28, 1980. Sh.Sharwan Kum...
Sanjiv Aggarwal vs.bharat Scouts and Guides & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2016
$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10828/2016 & CM No.42476/2016 1. SANJIV AGGARWAL ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. P.R. Chopra, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus BHARAT SCOUTS AND GUIDES & ANR. Through : Mr. Santosh Krishnan with Mr. Gaurav Aggarwal, Advocates ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % This order is in continuation of the order dated 25.11.2016 on which ORDER0612.2016 date, the Court had posed a query to the counsel for the petitioner that prior to instituting the present petition, when the petitioner had filed an earlier petition against the respondents, registered as WP(C)No.7993/2016, wherein respondent No.1/Association had filed a counter affidavit questioning the right of the petitioner invoking Article 226 of the Constitution of India on the ground that the respondent is not amenable to writ jurisdiction, as it is not a State or an agency of the Sate or a public authority and had specifically denied the assertion...
Vijay Kumar Rastogi vs.up State Roadways Transport Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2016
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: December 06, 2016 (i) + MAC.APP. 393/2009 VIJAY KUMAR RASTOGI ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Rekha Rustagi, Advocate Versus UP STATE ROADWAYS TRANSPORT CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Garima Prashad & Mr.Shadab Khan, Advocates (ii) + MAC.APP. 509/2009 UP STATE ROADWAYS TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Garima Prashad & Mr.Shadab Khan, Advocates Versus (iii) + MAC.APP. 725/2011 MANGI LAL GUPTA Versus VIJAY KUMAR RASTOGI & ORS. Through: Ms.Rekha Rustagi, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Rekha Rustagi, Advocate UP STATE ROADWAYS TRANSPORT CORPORATION MAC.APP.393/2009 MAC.APP.509/2009 MAC.APP.725/2011 MAC.APP.507/2009 ..... Respondent Page 1 of 9 Through: Ms. Garima Prashad & Mr.Shadab Khan, Advocates (iv) + MAC.APP. 507/2009 UP STATE ROADWAYS TRANSPORT CORPORATION Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Garima Prashad & Mr.Shadab Khan, Advocates Versus MANGI LAL GUPTA & ORS. Through: Ms.Rekha...
South Delhi Municipal Corporation vs.central Warehousing Corporation
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~ * % + W.P.(C) 1037/2016 & C.M. No.4516/2016 SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION Judgment reserved on:02. 12.2016. Judgment delivered on:06. 12.2016 ........ Petitioner Through Ms.Madhu Tewatia and Mr. Sachin Saini, Advocates. CENTRAL WAREHOUSING CORPORATION versus Through Mr.K.K.Tyagi, Advocate. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 The petitioner before this Court is the South Delhi Municipal Corporation. It is aggrieved by the order passed by the Municipal Tax Tribunal (MTT) dated 17.02.2015 vide which 10 appeals had been disposed of. These appeals were qua the tax liability of the Central Warehousing Corporation (respondent). 2 The controversy in the present case relates to the property of the Central Warehousing Corporation situated at 4/1, Siri Institutional Area, August Kranti Marg, New Delhi. The question which had arisen for decision before the MTT was whether the premises in question had to be le...
M/S. Lanco-Rani (Jv) vs.national Highways Authority of India Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2016
$~ * + M/S. LANCO-RANI (JV) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 199/2008 ........ Petitioner Through: Dr. Amit George with Mr. Swaroop George & Ms. Rajsree Ajay, Advocates. versus NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR Through: Mr. Rajiv Kapoor, Advocate. ..... Respondent ORDER0612.2016 % 1. The challenge in this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) filed by the... Petitioner, M/s. Lanco-Rani (JV), is to the impugned Award dated 5th January, 2008 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal (AT) in the disputes between the... Petitioner JV and the Respondent, National Highways Authority of India Limited (NHAI) arising out of the contract awarded to the JV for the construction of Four Laning of km 419.00 to km 447.00 of Purnea to Gayakota of NH-31 in the State of Bihar.2. It is stated that the work of construction of the Kishangunj Flyover in KM-473-475 on NH No.31 spanning over 738 meters was added to the said con...
Mehra Cosmetics vs.ram Kumar Gulati & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2016
$~12. * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) No.196/2016 MEHRACOSMETICS ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Mohan Vidhani, Mr. Rahul Vidhani and Ms. Gita, Advs. versus RAM KUMAR GULATI & ORS. ..... Defendants Through: Mr. K.K. Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Suwarn Rajan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW % ORDER0612.2016 IA No.15175/2016 (of the plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 CPC).1. The plaintiff, in pursuance to the order dated 29th November, 2016 on IA No.14783/2016 of the defendants no.1,2&3, seeks to amend the plaint to bring the reliefs claimed therein within the pecuniary jurisdiction of this Court. The plaintiff, by this application also makes averments against M/s.2. G.M. Plastics which was impleaded vide order dated 29th November, 2016.3. The senior counsel for the defendants no.1,2&3 has opposed this application contending that the plaintiff cannot whimsically increase the valuation from Rs.10,00,000/- to Rs.1,00,00,000/-, merely by paying additional court...
Naveen vs.state (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-06-2016
$~43 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. A. 222/2015 Judgment reserved on 24th November, 2016 Judgment pronounced on 6th December, 2016 NAVEEN Through: Mr. Sunil Mehta, Adv. Versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Appellant ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP with SI Surinder Kumar & ASI Banwari Lal, P.S. Hari Nagar. WITH CRL. A. 510/2015 SANJEEV STATE ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Mehta, Adv. Versus Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, APP with SI Surinder Kumar & ASI Banwari Lal, P.S. Hari Nagar ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K. PATHAK, J.1. Vide judgment dated 24th December, 2014, impugned in these appeals, trial court has convicted the appellants under Sections 392/397/4IPC besides Sections 25/27/of the Arms Act. Appellant-Naveen has also been convicted under Section 411 IPC. Vide order on sentence dated 24th December, 2014 appellants have been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years with fine of Crl. A. 222/2015 with Crl. A...
- ‹ Prev
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- Next ›
- Last »