Delhi Court December 2016 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2016 Page 1 of about 517 results (0.021 seconds)Jitender @ Kalla vs.state Govt of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:8th December, 2016 Judgment pronounced on:24th December, 2016 + Crl.A.966/2013 JITENDER @ KALLA ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Amit Sharma with Mr. Ashish Dixit and Mr. Harpreet Singh Rai, Advocates Versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP + Crl.A.967/2013 JITENDER @ KALLA ..... Appellant Through : Mr. Amit Sharma with Mr. Ashish Dixit and Mr. Harpreet Singh Rai, Advocates Versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through : Ms. Aashaa Tiwari, APP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL G.S.SISTANI, J.1. Both appeals filed by the appellant Jitender @ Kalla are being decided by a common judgment.2. Crl. A. 966/2013 arises out of a judgment dated 01.07.2013 pertaining to FIR No.67/1999 under Sections 302/3of the Indian Penal Code by which the appellant stands convicted and also the order on sentence of the same date by which the a...
Tag this Judgment!M/S Az Tech (India) & Anr. Vs.m/s Intex Technologies (India) Ltd. & An ...
Court: Delhi
$~ * + % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) 2060/2013 Judgment Reserved on: Judgment Pronounced on:24. h December, 2016 1st December, 2016 M/s AZ Tech (India) & Anr. ..... Plaintiffs Through : Ms. Pratibha M. Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sagar Chandra, Mr. Ankit Rastogi and Ms. Ishani Chandra, Advocates. versus M/s Intex Technologies (India) Ltd. & Anr. ..... Defendants Through : Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Aditya Gupta and Mr. Utkarsh Srivastava, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.I.A. No.17138/2013 (under Order XXXIX Rule 1 &2) 1. This is an application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure filed by the plaintiffs seeking an ad interim injunction against the defendants from using the trademark AQUA. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiffs seeking permanent injunction, delivery up, production of accounts, damages etc.2. The trademark involved in the present suit is the word mark Aqua pertaining to mobile phones (her...
Tag this Judgment!Maruti Insurance Business Agency Limited vs.maruti Suzuki India Limite ...
Court: Delhi
MARUTI INSURANCE AGENCY NETWORK LIMITED Applicant/Transferor Company no.3 MARUTI INSURANCE AGENCY SOLUTIONS LIMITED Applicant/Transferor Company no.4 MARUTI INSURANCE AGENCY SERVICES LIMITED Applicant/Transferor Company no.5 AND AND AND AND AND AND IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:24. 12.2016 CO. APPL. (M) 127/2016 IN THE MATTER OF:-"MARUTI INSURANCE BUSINESS AGENCY LIMITED Applicant/Transferor Company no.1 MARUTI INSURANCE DISTRIBUTION SERVICES LIMITED Applicant/Transferor Company no.2 MARUTI INSURANCE AGENCY LOGISTICS LIMITED Applicant/Transferor Company no.6 MARUTI INSURANCE BROKER LIMITED Applicant/Transferor Company no.7 WITH MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LIMITED Applicant/Transferee Company CO.APPL. (M) 127/2016 Page 1 of 10 Through: Mr. Anirudh Das, Mr. Kamaljeet Singh and Mr. Vikram Shah, Advocates for the Applicants. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. This joint application has been filed under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 195...
Tag this Judgment!Gangotri Enterprises Ltd. Vs.national Thermal Power Corporation Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on: December 24, 2016 FAO(OS) COMM1492016 GANGOTRI ENTERPRISES LTD. Through Ms. Chetna Bhalla, Advocate. ..... Appellant versus Through None NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LTD. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHAWLA JUDGMENT INDIRA BANERJEE, J (ORAL) 1. This appeal under Section 37 (1) (b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996, hereinafter referred to as the 1996 Act, is against an order dated 22.12.2016 passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the application being OMP (1) (COMM) No.60/2015, filed by the appellant under Section 9 of the 1996 Act. ===================================================================== FAO(OS) COMM1492016 Page 1 of 10 2. The respondent issued a Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) dated 16.02.2007 for Raw Water Reservoir Civil Works for National Thermal Power Corporation (NTPC), Stage-II at Dadri in Gautam Budh Nagar District...
Tag this Judgment!Mother Dairy Fruit & Vegetable Pvt. Ltd vs.s.k. Raheem & Anr
Court: Delhi
$ * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:7. h December, 2016 Pronounced on:24th December, 2016 CS (OS) 2399/2010 MOTHER DAIRY FRUIT & VEGETABLE PVT. LTD Through: Mr. Nischal Anand, Advocate with Mr. Aman Taneja, Advocate ...... Plaintiff Versus S.K. RAHEEM & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Ex-parte CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA1 JUDGMENT This suit was instituted in November, 2010 seeking the reliefs of permanent injunction, damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up, etc. by the plaintiff company it being a wholly owned subsidiary of National Dairy Development Board (NDDB), a body corporate constituted under the National Dairy Development Board Act, 1987, having its registered office at Mother Dairy, Patparganj, Delhi-110 092, within the jurisdiction of this court.2. The claim in the suit is founded, inter alia, on the trademark MOTHER DAIRY, registered in the name of the plaintiff for sale of its various products in the nature of liquid milk, dahi (curd), ice CS...
Tag this Judgment!Ntpc Ltd. Vs.siemens Atiengesellschaft
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 04.2016 Pronounced on:23. 12.2016 FAO (OS) 372/2012 NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Dr. Ashwani Kumar, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Ruchi Gour Narula and Ms. Smitakshi Talukdar, Advocates, for appellant. versus SIEMENS ATIENGESELLSCHAFT Through: ..... Respondent Sh. Parag. P. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Anil Bhatnagar, Sh. Amit Dhindra, Sh. Aman Leekha, Sh. Amandeep Bawa and Sh. Shikhar Khare, Advocates, for respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % FAO (OS) 372/2012 stands dismissed with costs throughout. For detailed judgment, the decision dated 23.12.2016 in FAO(OS) 371/2012 may be referred to. DECEMBER23 2016 S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) DEEPA SHARMA (JUDGE) FAO (OS) 372/2012 Page 1...
Tag this Judgment!Myspace Inc. Vs.super Cassettes Industries Ltd.
Court: Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 04.2016 Pronounced on:23. 12.2016 FAO(OS) 540/2011, C.M. APPL.20174/2011, 13919 & 17996/2015 MYSPACE INC. ..... Appellant Through: Sh. Rajendra Kumar, Sh. Prashant Gupta and Sh. Kanishk Kumar, Advocate. Versus SUPER CASSETTES INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Sh. Amit Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Neel Mason, Sh. Ankit Relan, Sh. Harsh Kaushik, Sh. Vinay. P. Tripathi, Ms Ridhima Pabbi, Ms. Rashi Punia and Sh. Sameer Rohatgi, Advocates. Ms. Shwetasree Majumdar and Ms. Tanya Verma, Advocates, for intervener. Ms. Kanika Jain, Advocate, for Intervener/Flipkart Internet Pvt. Ltd. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. is a defendants This interlocutory appeal in C.S(OS) 2682/2008 (the suit)wherein the order, on application by the plaintiff(Super Cassettes or SCIL)for interim injunction was granted and the appellant (MySpace) was restrained from hosting o...
Tag this Judgment!Udbhash Mukherjee vs.kendriya Vidhalaya Sangathan
Court: Delhi
$~02 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 11804/2016 Date of decision:23. d December, 2016 UDBHASH MUKHERJEE ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Subhash Gosai, Advocate. versus KENDRIYA VIDHALAYA SANGATHAN Through ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) The petitioner-Udbhash Mukherjee is facing departmental proceedings under Rules 14 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965 vide charge sheet dated 28th June, 2006. The aforesaid Rules are applicable mutatis mutandis to Kendriya Vidhayalaya Sangathan.2. During the pendency of the disciplinary proceedings, the petitioner retired from service as a Trained Graduate Teacher in Drawing on 31st W.P. (C) 11804/2016 Page 1 of 5 August, 2011.3. On or about 30th April, 2014, the petitioner filed OA No.1690/2014, primarily on the ground that disciplinary proceedings could not have continued post retirement as there was no ...
Tag this Judgment!Ntpc vs.siemens Atiengesellschaft
Court: Delhi
* + + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. 04.2016 Pronounced on:23. 12.2016 FAO (OS) 371/2012 FAO (OS) 372/2012 NATIONAL THERMAL POWER CORPORATION LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Dr. Ashwani Kumar, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Ruchi Gour Narula and Ms. Smitakshi Talukdar, Advocates, for appellant. versus SIEMENS ATIENGESELLSCHAFT Through: ..... Respondent Sh. Parag. P. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Anil Bhatnagar, Sh. Amit Dhindra, Sh. Aman Leekha, Sh. Amandeep Bawa and Sh. Shikhar Khare, Advocates, for respondent. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. These two appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 ('Act')impugn a common judgment, dismissing two petitions (O.M.P. Nos. 229 and 230/ 2009) under Section 34 of the Act. The appellant, National Thermal Power Corporation Limited('NTPC' hereafter) challenged the partial Award dated 31st July 2002 and the finalAward dated 6th Ja...
Tag this Judgment!Uttam Sucrotech International Private Limited vs.uttam Sucrotech Inter ...
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On:18. 11.2016 Judgment Delivered On:23. 12.2016 COMPANY PETITION No.70 OF2016IN THE MATTER OF UTTAM SUCROTECH INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE LIMITED... Petitioner /Transferor Company AND UTTAM SUCROTECH INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED... Petitioner /Transferee Company Through Mr. P. Nagesh with Mr. Ashutosh Gupta Advocates for the... Petitioner Company Ms. Aparna Mudiam, Assistant Registrar of Companies for the Regional Director Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for the Official Liquidator CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J1 The present petition has been filed jointly, under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), by Uttam CO.PET.70/2016 Page 1 of 1 Sucrotech International Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferor Company) and Uttam Sucrotech International Holdings Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as Transferee Company), for approval of...
Tag this Judgment!