Delhi Court September 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 22 of about 257 results (0.021 seconds)Sunil Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :29.08.2014. Judgment delivered on :04.09.2014. CRL.A. 78/2003 SUNIL Through versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through ..... Appellant Ms.Ruchi Kapoor, Advocate. ..... Respondent Mr.Ravi Nayak, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR INDERMEET KAUR, J.1 This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and order of sentence dated 10.12.2002 and 12.12.2002 respectively wherein appellant Sunil was convicted under Sections 376/506-II/452 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for a period of 7 years and to pay a fine of Rs.50,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for two years for the offence under Section 376 of the IPC; for the offence under Section 452 of the IPC, he was sentenced to undergo RI for a period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs.25,000/- and in default of payment of fine to undergo SI for one year; for the offence under Section 506-II of the IPC, he was sentenced to pay ...
Tag this Judgment!Anwar Ul Haque Vs. State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: September 01, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: September 04, 2014 % + CRL.A.807 of 2014 ANWAR UL HAQUE Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.K.Singhal, Advocate. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Represented by: .... Respondent Ms.Aashaa Tiwari, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Anwar-Ul-Haque is aggrieved by the judgment dated January 29, 2014 convicting him for offence punishable under Sections 419/363/366/376 (2) (f)/377/506 Part-II IPC and the order on sentence dated February 15, 2014 directing him to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for three years and a fine of `1,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 419 IPC; Rigorous Imprisonment for five years and a fine of `1,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 363 IPC; Rigorous Imprisonment for seven years and a fine of `1,000/- for the offence punishable under Section 366 IPC; Life Imprisonment and...
Tag this Judgment!Rps Vikas Casting Private Limited and anr Vs. ...........
Court: Delhi
$~2 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO.APPL (M) No.115/2014 IN THE MATTER OF RPS VIKAS CASTING PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ..... Applicant Through: Mr. Shankh Sengupta and Ms. Srishti Jain, Advocates for the Applicants CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA ORDER0409.2014 % SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL) 1. This is a first motion joint application under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act) in connection with the Scheme of Amalgamation (Scheme) of RPS Vikas Castings Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Transferor Company) and GarimaVikas Metals Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as the Transferee Company) (hereinafter collectively referred to as Applicant Companies). A copy of the proposed Scheme is enclosed with the application. =========================================================================== CO. APPL. (M) No.115/2014 1 2. The registered offices of both the Applicant Companies are situated within the National Capital Territory of Delh...
Tag this Judgment!Kapil Singh Negi Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:04. 09.2014 + W.P.(C) 3781/2014 KAPIL SINGH NEGI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. Rishi Kapoor with Mr. Pankaj Kapoor and Mr. Parijat Kishore, Advocates Versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amrit Pal Singh, CGSC with Mr. H. Nunpuii, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI NAJMI WAZIRI, J.(Oral) 1. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks quashing of the decision dated 28.12.2013 taken by the office of Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB), Ministry of Home Affairs whereby the appointment of the petitioner to the post of Head Constable (Tele.) was cancelled.2. The respondents, in May, 2013, vide Recruitment Notice for Telecom Cadre- 2013-14 had advertised and invited applications from Indian male citizens for recruitment to various posts including the post of _____________________________________________________________________ __ Head Con...
Tag this Judgment!Indian Council of Agricultural Research and anr. Vs. Shri Yog Raj Sing ...
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:04. 09.2014 + W.P.(C) 2952/2014, C.M. NO.6139/2014 INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND ANR. ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. K. Pushkar, Advocate. versus SHRI YOG RAJ SINGH ..... Respondent Through : Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT) % 1. In these writ proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners (hereafter the ICAR) challenge the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 3.1.2014 in O.A. No.1301/2012, on the ground that the CAT wrongly computed the respondents period of service from 1971, instead of 1978, and accordingly directed the grant of the second financial upgradation in the Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACP).2. The respondent was appointed as Junior Stenographer (re- designated Stenographer in September 1971) on 31.8.1971, subject to his passing the shorthand test...
Tag this Judgment!Sapna Infracoloniser Pvt. Ltd Vs. .........
Court: Delhi
$~21 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO.PET. 160/2014 IN THE MATTER OF SAPNA INFRACOLONISER PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajeev K Goel, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Atma Sah, Assistant Registrar of Companies for the Regional Director. Mr. Rajiv Behl, Advocate for the Official Liquidator. CORA M: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA ORDER % 04.09.2014 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL) 1. This second motion joint petition has been filed under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act) seeking sanction of the Scheme of Amalgamation (Scheme) of Sapna Infracoloniser Pvt Ltd (Transferor Company ) with Dee Pearls (India) Pvt Ltd (Transferee Company ) (hereinafter all Companies collectively referred to as Petitioner Companies). A copy of the Scheme has been enclosed with the Petition ================================================== CO.PET. 160/2014 1 2. The registered offices of the Petitioner Companies are situated at New Delhi, within the jurisdict ion of this...
Tag this Judgment!Moolchand Khairati Ram Hospital and Ayurvedic Resear Vs. Govt of Nct a ...
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:04. 09.2014 C.M. No.5914/2014 in W.P.(C) 4703/2003 D.T.C. ..... Petitioner versus PREM SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondents : Ms Saroj Bidawat. : Mr Shyam Moorjani and Mr Shantanu Bhardwaj for R-2. AND + C.M. No.10789/2013 in W.P.(C) 18152/2006 MOOLCHAND KHAIRATI RAM HOSPITAL & AYURVEDIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE ..... Petitioner versus GOVT OF NCT & ANR ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Raj Birbal, Sr. Advocate with Ms Raavi Birbal with Mr Abhishek Bhardwaj. For the Respondents : Mr Shyam Moorjani and Mr Shantanu Bhardwaj for R-2. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J C.M. No.10789/2013 in W.P.(C) 18152/2006 1. This application has been filed by respondent no.2 (workman), inter alia, praying that the above captioned writ petition be dismissed as the petitioner has failed and neglected to pay t...
Tag this Judgment!Achchey Lal Yadav Vs. State
Court: Delhi
$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: September 04, 2014 + CRL.A. 1171/2012 ACHCHEY LAL YADAV Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Avninder Singh, Advocate with Ms.Sumi Anand, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP Insp.Vijay Shrotriya, SHO, New Ashok Nagar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.(Oral) 1. Master Harsh aged five years was dropped, as claimed by his mother Rekha at the gate of MCD Nigam Prathmik Vidyalaya on January 22, 2009. He did not return home. As per the case of the prosecution Shambhu Nath Verma received ransom calls on mobile No.9958838258, the registered user whereof was Krishan Kumar, the nephew of Sambhu Nath Verma and had been handed over by Krishan Kumar Verma to Shambhu Nath Verma.2. The ransom calls were purportedly received by Shambhu Nath Verma from a mobile No.9718657950 and land line Nos.2511540 and 2511091, registered user whereo...
Tag this Judgment!Cement Corporation of India Ltd Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of Indi ...
Court: Delhi
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h September, 2014 % + LPA No.1299/2007 CEMENT CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD Through: .. Appellant Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Sr. Adv with Mr. Prakash Gautam and Ms. Shabana Ahmed, Advs. Versus LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. & ORS. Through: .. Respondents Mr. Kamal Mehta, Advs. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.1. This intra court appeal impugns the judgment dated 14th September, 2007 of the learned Single Judge of this Court of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.637/2005 preferred by the appellant. The said writ petition was preferred by the appellant impugning the order dated 20th November, 2004 of the Additional District Judge, Delhi, exercising the power as an Appellate Authority under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 (PP Act), of dismissal of the appeal preferred by the appellant against the order dated 25th September, 2003 of the Estate Officer of...
Tag this Judgment!Ram Gopal and anr Vs. Lt Governor, Govt of Nct and ors
Court: Delhi
$~1, 27 & 28 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + DECIDED ON:04. 09.2014 W.P. (CRL) 1709/2014, C.M. Nos.13046-13047/2014 RAM GOPAL & ANR ..... Petitioners versus LT GOVERNOR, GOVT OF NCT & ORS.. Respondents W.P. (C) 5587/2014, C.M. Nos. 13832, 13833/2014 & 14156/2014 GOPAL SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioners versus LT. GOVERNOR & ORS ..... Respondents W.P. (CRL) 1397/2014, C.M. Nos.10697-10698/2014 BIRMA NAND SHARMA ..... Petitioner versus LT GOVERNOR GOVT OF NCT & ORS .. Respondents Appearance: Mr. Amit Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Kaushik, Mr. Namit Suri and Mr. Gaurav Tanwar, Advocates for petitioners in all matters. Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anupam Varma, Mr. Nikhil Sharma and Mr. Ameen Jauhar, Advocates for BYPL in W.P.(Crl.)1709/2014 and W.P. (C)5587/2014. Mr. Sanjay Lao, Addl. Standing Counsel for R-1&2 in W.P. (Crl.) 1709/2014. Mr. Saqib with Mr. M.P.Singh, Advocates for R-5 in W.P. (C) 5587/2014. Mr. Ajay Digpaul, CGSC with Mr. Kunal Punj, Advocate for ...
Tag this Judgment!