Delhi Court September 2014 Judgments
Home Cases Delhi 2014 Page 21 of about 257 results (0.020 seconds)Dig K.P.S. Raghuvanshi Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10726/2009 DIG K.P.S. RAGHUVANSHI Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. B.P. Singh and Mr.Parma Nand, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Through: % ..... Respondents Ms. Maneesha Dhir, Advocate Date of Decision : September 04, 2014 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REVA KHETRAPAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The Petitioner, a serving Deputy Inspector General (DIG) in the Coast Guard, has challenged the recommendations of the Departmental Promotional Committee (DPC) for promotion to the rank of Inspector General (IG) held on 23.07.2009 as illegal, arbitrary and conducted on the basis of amended selection policy just a month prior to the holding of Selection Board. The Petitioner also seeks to challenge the actions of the Respondent No.2 (Director General) in endorsing an Annual Confidential Report of the Petitioner covering the period from 1st February, 2008 to 31st January, 2009 despite not having observed t...
Tag this Judgment!Times Innovative Media Ltd Vs. Ooh Media Solution Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
$~ 14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 2449/2011 Date of decision :4. h September, 2014 % TIMES INNOVATIVE MEDIA LTD Through : ..... Plaintiff Mr.K. Datta and Mr.Rahul Malhotra, Advs. versus OOH MEDIA SOLUTION PVT LTD ..... Defendant Through CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(Oral) 1. Plaintiff has filed the present suit for recovery of Rs.34,32,590/with interest at the rate of 18%, per annum.2. Initially, the suit was filed under the provisions of Order XXXVII of Code of Civil Procedure. By the order of the Joint Registrar dated 15.10.2011 the suit was converted into an ordinary suit. Despite service defendant has failed to enter appearance in the matter. Accordingly, defendant was proceeded ex parte on 11.11.2014.3. Plaintiff has filed the affidavit by way of evidence (Exhibit PW1/A) of Mr.Mukesh Gupta, (PW-1), Assistant Vice President (Finance) with the plaintiff company.4. As per PW-1, defendant had approached the plaintiff company for releasin...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Technofab Engineering Ltd. Vs. Lt. Col. Ved Kumar Slehria
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RC. REV. No.243/2013 and C.M. No.10582/2013 (stay) 4th September, 2014 % M/S. TECHNOFAB ENGINEERING LTD. ......Petitioner Through: Mr. P.K. Sharma, Advocate. VERSUS LT. COL. VED KUMAR SLEHRIA Through: ...... Respondent Mr. M. V. Chandra, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This revision petition is filed under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) impugning the order of the Additional Rent Controller dated 1.4.2013 by which the leave to defend application filed by the petitioner/tenant/company has been dismissed and eviction has been ordered with respect to the tenanted premises being flat no.509, Eros Apartment, 56 Nehru Place, New Delhi-19 as shown in red colour in the site plan. The respondent/landlord retired from Army as a Lieutenant Colonel and the bonafide necessity eviction petition was filed stating ...
Tag this Judgment!Shri Satya Dev and anr. Vs. M/S. Gaurav Financiers and anr.
Court: Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P.No.640/2000 4th September, 2014 % SHRI SATYA DEV AND ANR. Through: ......Petitioners Ms. Neha Singh, proxy counsel. VERSUS M/S. GAURAV FINANCIERS & ANR. Through: None. ...... Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to the Reporter or not?. VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J (ORAL) 1. This is a petition pending since the year 2000. It is now over around 14 years. This petition was dismissed in default on 17.7.2002 whereafter it was restored and listed in the category of Regular Matters on 4.10.2002. When no one appeared for the petitioner, court notice was issued vide order dated 23.1.2013. Petitioners thereafter appeared through their Advocate. Today, on the first call pass over was requested, as counsel was not available, which was granted, however, even on the second call, counsel for the petitioner does not appear. Considering the facts of this case, I am not inclined to grant a second pass over or an adjournment.2. The ...
Tag this Judgment!Host Buildwell Private Limited and ors. Vs. ................
Court: Delhi
$~1 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CO.PET. 360/2014 IN THE MATTER OF HOST BUILDWELL PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Atma Sah, Assistant Registrar of Companies for the Regional Director. Mr. Rajiv Behl, Advocate for the Official Liquidator. CORA M: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA ORDER % 04.09.2014 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J (ORAL) CA No.1977/2014 This is an application by the Regional Director seeking condonation of delay in filing the report. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the delay in filing the report is condoned. The report is directed to be taken on record. CA No.1980/2014 This is an application by the Official Liquidator seeking ============================================= CO.PET. 360/2014 1 condonation of delay in filing the report. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the delay in filing the report is condoned. The rep...
Tag this Judgment!Ashraf @ Arfi Vs. State(Govt. of Nct) of Delhi
Court: Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: + 4th September, 2014 CRL.A. 1454/2011 ASHRAF @ ARFI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. M.L. Yadav and Mr. Lokesh Chandra, Advocates versus STATE(GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Ritu Gauba, APP for the State with SI Afaque Ahmed, Police Station Adarsh Nagar. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. The short point for consideration in the present appeal is whether offence u/s 397 IPC is made out or not, in as much as learned counsel for the appellant has not challenged the conviction of the appellant for offence u/s 392/394 IPC.2. The prosecution case emanates from the fact that on 06.12.2008 at about 05.45 p.m at Gidwani Road, behind Moolchand Park, Adarsh Nagar, three boys armed with knives came and met the complainant Dhananjay. One of them inflicted knife injury on his right hand while two other boys snatched away Rs.10,000/- from his pocket and fled away. On 31.12.2008, accus...
Tag this Judgment!Birma Nand Sharma Vs. Lt Governor Govt of Nct and ors
Court: Delhi
$~ 27 & 28 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:04. 09.2014 + W.P. (C) 5587/2014, C.M. Nos. 13832, 13833/2014 & 14156/2014 GOPAL SINGH & ORS ..... Petitioners versus LT. GOVERNOR & ORS ..... Respondents W.P. (CRL) 1397/2014, C.M. Nos.10697-10698/2014 BIRMA NAND SHARMA ..... Petitioner versus LT GOVERNOR GOVT OF NCT & ORS .. Respondents Appearance: Mr. Amit Sibal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Manish Kaushik, Mr. Namit Suri and Mr. Gaurav Tanwar, Advocates for petitioners in all matters. Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anupam Varma, Mr. Nikhil Sharma and Mr. Ameen Jauhar, Advocates for BYPL in W.P.(C)5587/2014. Mr. Saqib with Mr. M.P.Singh, Advocates for R-5 in W.P. (C) 5587/2014. Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anupam Varma, Mr. Nikhil Sharma and Mr. Ameen Jauhar, Advocates for BYPL in W.P.(Crl.)1397/2014. Mr. Anupam Varma, Mr. Nikhil Sharma and Mr. Ameen Jauhar, Advocates for NDPL (TPDDL) W.P.(Crl.)1397/14 & W.P. (C)5587/14 Page 1 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S....
Tag this Judgment!Seema Jhamb and ors Vs. Icici Lombard General Insurance Cio Ltd.
Court: Delhi
$~A-33& 34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:04. 09.2014 + MAC.APP. 508/2009 SEEMA JHAMB & ORS ..... Appellant Through Mr.Navneet Goyal, Advocate versus ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE CIO LTD` ..... Respondent Through Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate for R-1/ ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Mr.Pradeep Gaur, Advocate for R-4/Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd. + MAC.APP. 195/2010 ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr.Pradeep Gaur, Advocate versus SEEMA JHAMB & ORS ..... Respondent Through Mr.Navneet Goyal, Advocate for R-1 to R-3 Mr.Pankaj Seth, Advocate for ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company/R-4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. MAC Appeal. No.508/2009 is filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of the amount awarded pursuant to a claim petition filed by them by the Tribunal. MAC App. No.195/2010 is filed by the Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. claiming that the vehicle insured by them, namely, the truck is not in any ...
Tag this Judgment!Nnadi K. Iheanyi Vs. Narcotics Control Bureau
Court: Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.A. 1416 of 2010 Reserved on: August 6, 2014 Decision on: September 4, 2014 NNADI K. IHEANYI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rahul Tyagi and Mr. V.V.P.Singh, Advocates. versus NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU ... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajesh Manchanda and Mr. Rajat Manchanda, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUDGMENT0409.2014 1. The Appellant challenges the judgment dated 29th September 2010 passed by the Special Judge - NDPS in SC No.N-58/08 convicting the Appellant for the offence under Section 21(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for being found in possession of 292 gms. of heroin as well as the judgment on sentence dated 6th October 2010 whereby he was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment (RI) for ten years along with a fine of Rs. 1,00,000 and in default, to undergo simple imprisonment (SI) for six months. The case of the prosecution 2. The case of the Respondent, Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) is that ...
Tag this Judgment!D.T.C. Vs. Prem Singh and ors.
Court: Delhi
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:04. 09.2014 C.M. No.5914/2014 in W.P.(C) 4703/2003 D.T.C. ..... Petitioner versus PREM SINGH & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner For the Respondents : Ms Saroj Bidawat. : Mr Shyam Moorjani and Mr Shantanu Bhardwaj for R-2. AND + C.M. No.10789/2013 in W.P.(C) 18152/2006 MOOLCHAND KHAIRATI RAM HOSPITAL & AYURVEDIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE ..... Petitioner versus GOVT OF NCT & ANR ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Raj Birbal, Sr. Advocate with Ms Raavi Birbal with Mr Abhishek Bhardwaj. For the Respondents : Mr Shyam Moorjani and Mr Shantanu Bhardwaj for R-2. CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, J C.M. No.10789/2013 in W.P.(C) 18152/2006 1. This application has been filed by respondent no.2 (workman), inter alia, praying that the above captioned writ petition be dismissed as the petitioner has failed and neglected to pay t...
Tag this Judgment!